FindAlternative
Back to namviek

namviek vs Tasks.md

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
namviek
namviekOpen‑source task manager built for tiny teams
Visit
Tasks.md
Tasks.mdMinimal self‑hosted task board using plain Markdown files
Visit
Overview
Description

Namviek is a lightweight, open‑source task management tool designed for small teams that need a simple yet powerful way to track work. It runs on a modern stack (ExpressJS, MongoDB, Next.js 13) and can be self‑hosted on any cloud or on‑premise server. The platform offers essential features like Kanban boards, real‑time updates, and flexible workflows while keeping costs low. Because it’s open source, teams can customize it to fit their exact processes without paying subscription fees.

Tasks.md is a lightweight, self‑hosted task management board that stores each card as an individual Markdown file on your server. This file‑based approach makes editing, backing up, and version‑controlling tasks simple with any text editor or Git workflow. Delivered as a Docker container, it runs locally or on a private network and is accessed through a clean browser UI. It offers lanes, cards, tags, and filters for individuals and small teams who prefer a no‑frills board without third‑party data exposure.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Project Management
Task & To-Do
Best for
Tiny teams and startups
Individuals and small teams
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
2,543+18%
2,159
api available
No
Yes
support options
Community forum, Email
Email
key integrations
Slack, GitHub, Notion
—
primary language
TypeScript
JavaScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free and open source
  • Self‑hosted gives full data control
  • Simple UI focused on core task management
  • Extensible via API and custom code
  • Zero cost, fully free
  • Data stored as plain Markdown files
  • Easy Docker deployment
  • No external data sharing
Cons
  • Limited native mobile apps
  • No built‑in advanced reporting
  • Community support only, no dedicated SLA
  • Limited advanced features compared to SaaS kanban tools
  • No built‑in mobile app, relies on browser access
  • Requires self‑hosting knowledge for setup and maintenance
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to namviek

View all →
Kanboard
Kanboard

Free, self‑hosted Kanban board for small teams and individuals

Compare
Wekan
Wekan

Open-source kanban board for small teams and freelancers

Compare
Focalboard
Focalboard

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion

Compare
Leantime
Leantime

Open-source project management for small teams and freelancers

Compare

Alternatives to Tasks.md

View all →
obsidian-tasks
obsidian-tasks

Powerful task management directly inside your Obsidian notes

Compare
Personal Management System
Personal Management System

Organize your day, goals, and tasks in one simple web app

Compare
namviek
namviek

Open‑source task manager built for tiny teams

Compare
planka
planka

Open-source Kanban board with real‑time sync and markdown cards

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Namviek offers a self‑hosted, fully free open‑source solution with unlimited Kanban boards, while Tasks.md provides a cloud‑based markdown‑centric tool with API access; the trade‑off is control vs. convenience.

Key differences

  • •Deployment model: Namviek is self‑hosted; Tasks.md runs as SaaS.
  • •Data format: Namviek stores tasks in its own DB; Tasks.md stores tasks as plain markdown files.
  • •API availability: Namviek’s REST API is mentioned but listed as unavailable; Tasks.md explicitly offers an API.
  • •Integration focus: Namviek lists Slack, GitHub, Notion; Tasks.md has minimal integrations at launch.
  • •Support channels: Namviek relies on community forum and email; Tasks.md offers email support only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free, but Namviek’s self‑hosted model avoids any SaaS costs, giving pure zero‑cost ownership.

namviek

Ease of use / learning curve

Tasks.md uses plain markdown and keyboard shortcuts, resulting in a lower learning curve than Namviek’s Kanban UI.

Tasks.md

Features & depth

Namviek provides unlimited Kanban boards, custom workflows, role‑based permissions; Tasks.md lacks advanced task‑management features.

namviek

Integrations & ecosystem

Namviek lists Slack, GitHub, Notion integrations; Tasks.md reports minimal integrations at launch.

namviek

Collaboration

Both offer real‑time sync across users, ensuring instant collaboration.

Tie

Scalability

Self‑hosted Namviek can scale with the team's own infrastructure; Tasks.md is limited to the SaaS provider’s capacity.

namviek

Support

Tasks.md provides direct email support; Namviek relies on community forum plus email, no dedicated SLA.

Tasks.md

Security & privacy

Namviek’s self‑hosting gives full data control; Tasks.md stores data in the cloud with no stated privacy guarantees.

namviek

Migration / lock‑in

Tasks.md stores tasks as markdown files, making export and migration trivial; Namviek uses a DB with no export format mentioned.

Tasks.md

Choose namviek if…

Teams needing full data control, custom workflows, and self‑hosting.

Choose Tasks.md if…

Individuals or small teams preferring markdown simplicity and API access without managing servers.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either tool?

Both are free; Namviek is self‑hosted open source, Tasks.md is a free cloud SaaS.

Can I integrate the tool with Slack or GitHub?

Namviek lists Slack, GitHub, and Notion integrations; Tasks.md currently has minimal integrations.

What support will I get if I encounter an issue?

Namviek offers community forum and email; Tasks.md provides email support only, no SLA.