FindAlternative
Back to nTask

nTask vs worklenz

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
nTask
nTaskAll-in-one task and project management platform with Gantt, risk, and issue tracking.
worklenz
worklenzAll‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies
Overview
Description

nTask is a project and task management platform aimed at teams that need planning, meeting management, and risk tracking in a single tool. It combines Kanban boards and Gantt charts with less common features like formal risk matrices and issue tracking, alongside timesheets and team chat.

Worklenz is a free, open-source project management platform for teams and agencies, bringing projects, tasks, resource planning, and client collaboration into one workspace. Tasks can be viewed as a list, a Kanban board, or a Gantt chart, and time is logged directly against them. Alongside delivery it tracks budgets, costs, and team utilization, so project health and profitability stay visible. Worklenz can be self-hosted under AGPL-3.0 or used as a managed cloud service that has a free plan.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Project Management
Project Management
Best for
Small to mid-size teams needing task, meeting, and risk management in one tool
Agencies, professional services firms, and project teams
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Self-hosted
open source
No
Yes
api available
No
Yes
key integrations
1,000+ apps via Zapier
—
github stars
—
3,114
support options
—
Email, Live Chat
primary language
—
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Includes risk management and issue tracking not found in many competitors
  • Low entry price on paid tiers ($3-$8/user/month)
  • Free plan covers small teams up to 5 members
  • Meeting management is built in, not a separate add-on
  • Free and open-source under AGPL-3.0, with a self-hostable Community edition
  • Covers projects, tasks, resources, and budgets in one workspace
  • Multiple task views including list, Kanban board, and Gantt
  • Time logged directly on tasks feeds utilization and profitability reporting
Cons
  • Free tier is capped at 5 team members
  • Interface and feature depth can feel less polished than larger competitors
  • Enterprise pricing is not published
  • Free cloud plan is capped at three active projects
  • Self-hosting means running and maintaining your own Docker, Postgres, and storage stack
  • Mobile access is through the web app; there are no native iOS or Android apps
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to nTask

View all →
Zenkit
Zenkit

All-in-one work and project management platform with Kanban, Gantt, chat, and 100+ report views.

Compare
worklenz
worklenz

All‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies

Compare
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com

AI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability

Compare

Alternatives to worklenz

View all →
Huly
Huly

An open-source, all-in-one project management platform combining issues, chat, and docs.

Compare
Kaneo
Kaneo

Open source project management that works for you, not against you

Compare
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
Leantime
Leantime

Open-source project management for small teams and freelancers

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Worklenz offers open‑source, self‑hosted project management with built‑in budgeting and resource planning, while nTask provides a cloud SaaS focused on task, risk, and meeting management with extensive Zapier integrations.

Key differences

  • •Worklenz is self‑hosted and open‑source; nTask is cloud‑only and proprietary
  • •Worklenz includes native budgeting, cost tracking and resource scheduling; nTask adds risk, issue and meeting management
  • •nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no listed third‑party integrations
  • •Free tier limits: Worklenz caps three active projects, nTask caps five team members
  • •Deployment and maintenance: Worklenz requires Docker/Postgres setup, nTask requires no infrastructure
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both have freemium plans; Worklenz free cloud limits projects, nTask free limits users—value depends on need

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

nTask is cloud SaaS with no self‑hosting, generally easier for non‑technical teams

nTask

Features & depth

Worklenz includes budgeting, cost tracking, resource planning; nTask lacks these but adds risk/issue tracking

worklenz

Integrations & ecosystem

nTask offers 1,000+ Zapier integrations; Worklenz lists no integrations

nTask

Collaboration

Both provide comments, file sharing, real‑time updates; nTask adds built‑in chat

Tie

Scalability

Worklenz can be self‑hosted and scaled via own infrastructure; nTask limited to provider’s SaaS limits

worklenz

Support & security

Worklenz offers email and live chat plus open‑source community; nTask provides no listed support channels

worklenz

Choose nTask if…

Small to mid‑size teams wanting cloud simplicity, risk/issue tracking, and extensive Zapier integrations.

Choose worklenz if…

Teams needing on‑premise control, budgeting, and resource planning, and able to manage Docker/Postgres infrastructure.

Common questions

Can I self‑host the tool?

Yes, Worklenz offers a self‑hosted Community edition; nTask is cloud‑only.

Does either product include budgeting or cost tracking?

Worklenz provides financial insights, budget and cost tracking; nTask does not list budgeting features.

What integrations are available out of the box?

nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no specified integrations.