nTask vs worklenz
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
nTask is a project and task management platform aimed at teams that need planning, meeting management, and risk tracking in a single tool. It combines Kanban boards and Gantt charts with less common features like formal risk matrices and issue tracking, alongside timesheets and team chat.
Worklenz is a free, open-source project management platform for teams and agencies, bringing projects, tasks, resource planning, and client collaboration into one workspace. Tasks can be viewed as a list, a Kanban board, or a Gantt chart, and time is logged directly against them. Alongside delivery it tracks budgets, costs, and team utilization, so project health and profitability stay visible. Worklenz can be self-hosted under AGPL-3.0 or used as a managed cloud service that has a free plan.
- Includes risk management and issue tracking not found in many competitors
- Low entry price on paid tiers ($3-$8/user/month)
- Free plan covers small teams up to 5 members
- Meeting management is built in, not a separate add-on
- Free and open-source under AGPL-3.0, with a self-hostable Community edition
- Covers projects, tasks, resources, and budgets in one workspace
- Multiple task views including list, Kanban board, and Gantt
- Time logged directly on tasks feeds utilization and profitability reporting
- Free tier is capped at 5 team members
- Interface and feature depth can feel less polished than larger competitors
- Enterprise pricing is not published
- Free cloud plan is capped at three active projects
- Self-hosting means running and maintaining your own Docker, Postgres, and storage stack
- Mobile access is through the web app; there are no native iOS or Android apps
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to nTask
View all →Alternatives to worklenz
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataWorklenz offers open‑source, self‑hosted project management with built‑in budgeting and resource planning, while nTask provides a cloud SaaS focused on task, risk, and meeting management with extensive Zapier integrations.
Key differences
- •Worklenz is self‑hosted and open‑source; nTask is cloud‑only and proprietary
- •Worklenz includes native budgeting, cost tracking and resource scheduling; nTask adds risk, issue and meeting management
- •nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no listed third‑party integrations
- •Free tier limits: Worklenz caps three active projects, nTask caps five team members
- •Deployment and maintenance: Worklenz requires Docker/Postgres setup, nTask requires no infrastructure
Pricing & value
Both have freemium plans; Worklenz free cloud limits projects, nTask free limits users—value depends on need
Ease of use / learning curve
nTask is cloud SaaS with no self‑hosting, generally easier for non‑technical teams
Features & depth
Worklenz includes budgeting, cost tracking, resource planning; nTask lacks these but adds risk/issue tracking
Integrations & ecosystem
nTask offers 1,000+ Zapier integrations; Worklenz lists no integrations
Collaboration
Both provide comments, file sharing, real‑time updates; nTask adds built‑in chat
Scalability
Worklenz can be self‑hosted and scaled via own infrastructure; nTask limited to provider’s SaaS limits
Support & security
Worklenz offers email and live chat plus open‑source community; nTask provides no listed support channels
Choose nTask if…
Small to mid‑size teams wanting cloud simplicity, risk/issue tracking, and extensive Zapier integrations.
Choose worklenz if…
Teams needing on‑premise control, budgeting, and resource planning, and able to manage Docker/Postgres infrastructure.
Common questions
Can I self‑host the tool?
Yes, Worklenz offers a self‑hosted Community edition; nTask is cloud‑only.
Does either product include budgeting or cost tracking?
Worklenz provides financial insights, budget and cost tracking; nTask does not list budgeting features.
What integrations are available out of the box?
nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Worklenz has no specified integrations.
