nTask vs Teamwork.com
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
nTask is a project and task management platform aimed at teams that need planning, meeting management, and risk tracking in a single tool. It combines Kanban boards and Gantt charts with less common features like formal risk matrices and issue tracking, alongside timesheets and team chat.
Teamwork.com integrates project management, resource planning, and financial tracking into one platform aimed squarely at agencies, consultancies, and other client-services teams. It covers client intake forms, task creation, team collaboration, and client approval workflows, alongside capacity planning, workload balancing, and utilization tracking for resourcing. Financial controls include budget tracking, time logging, cost management, profitability reporting, and billing rate setup, while AI features can auto-create projects from briefs, assign resources intelligently, and forecast profitability. The platform offers 150+ integrations including Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Xero, and Microsoft Outlook, plus web, iOS, and Android apps.
- Includes risk management and issue tracking not found in many competitors
- Low entry price on paid tiers ($3-$8/user/month)
- Free plan covers small teams up to 5 members
- Meeting management is built in, not a separate add-on
- Combines project delivery with financial and resourcing controls in one tool
- Purpose-built for agencies and professional services rather than generic teams
- AI features aim to reduce manual project setup and resourcing work
- Strong integration list covering CRM, accounting, and communication tools
- Free tier is capped at 5 team members
- Interface and feature depth can feel less polished than larger competitors
- Enterprise pricing is not published
- Pricing is not disclosed on the homepage and requires visiting the pricing page
- Feature depth aimed at client-services firms may be more than generic teams need
- Financial and profitability tooling adds a learning curve versus simpler PM tools
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to nTask
View all →Alternatives to Teamwork.com
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataTeamwork.com is a premium, agency‑focused platform that bundles project delivery with financial and resource profitability tools, while nTask offers a freemium, general‑purpose task and project suite with risk/issue features and broader Zapier integration.
Key differences
- •Teamwork targets agencies/professional services with built‑in budgeting, billing, and AI‑driven resource scheduling; nTask is a generic task‑centric tool with risk, issue, and meeting management.
- •Teamwork’s pricing is subscription‑only and not disclosed upfront; nTask provides a free tier for up to 5 users and low‑cost paid plans.
- •Teamwork lists 150+ native integrations (Slack, Salesforce, QuickBooks, Xero, etc.); nTask relies on Zapier for 1,000+ apps but has no native connectors.
- •Teamwork includes AI‑powered smart scheduling and automated project creation from briefs; nTask offers Gantt, Kanban, and risk matrices but no AI automation.
- •Teamwork combines financial tracking (budget, cost, billing rates) with project work; nTask focuses on task, time, and risk tracking without built‑in invoicing.
Pricing & value
nTask offers a free plan for up to 5 users and $3‑$8 per user/month; Teamwork requires paid subscription with undisclosed pricing.
Ease of use / learning curve
nTask’s simpler task‑centric UI is likely easier for generic teams; Teamwork adds financial modules that increase learning complexity.
Features & depth
Teamwork provides agency‑specific budgeting, AI scheduling, and profitability tools not present in nTask.
Integrations & ecosystem
Teamwork lists 150+ native integrations with key business apps; nTask relies on Zapier for 1,000+ but has no native connectors.
Collaboration
Both support comments/chat; Teamwork adds client‑facing proofs, nTask adds meeting agendas and real‑time chat.
Scalability
Teamwork’s resource planning and capacity tools suit larger agency portfolios; nTask’s free tier caps at 5 users.
Support & security
Neither fact sheet mentions support levels or security certifications; cannot determine a winner.
Choose nTask if…
Small to mid‑size teams wanting a low‑cost, task‑focused tool with risk/issue tracking and Zapier integration.
Choose Teamwork.com if…
Agencies or professional‑services firms needing budgeting, billing, and AI‑driven resource planning.
Common questions
Is there a free version I can try?
nTask offers a free plan for up to 5 members; Teamwork only provides paid subscriptions, pricing not shown on the homepage.
Can the tool handle client invoicing and profitability tracking?
Teamwork includes budget tracking, cost management, and billing rate setup for client invoicing; nTask does not provide financial or invoicing features.
What integrations are available out of the box?
Teamwork has 150+ native integrations (e.g., Slack, Salesforce, QuickBooks, Xero); nTask accesses apps via Zapier but has no native integrations.

