FindAlternative
Back to nTask

nTask vs Quire

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
nTask
nTaskAll-in-one task and project management platform with Gantt, risk, and issue tracking.
Quire
QuireNested task lists, Kanban, and Gantt views for teams that need structure without heavy overhead.
Overview
Description

nTask is a project and task management platform aimed at teams that need planning, meeting management, and risk tracking in a single tool. It combines Kanban boards and Gantt charts with less common features like formal risk matrices and issue tracking, alongside timesheets and team chat.

Quire is a task and project management platform built around nested task lists that let teams break big goals down into manageable sub-tasks without losing the big picture. Alongside the signature infinite nested list, it offers Kanban boards, a dynamic timeline/Gantt view, and a calendar view, so the same task data can be viewed the way that best fits the moment. Quire adds collaborative documents, custom fields, smart folders, and interactive reports for tracking progress across projects, and it is used by teams ranging from small businesses to large organizations. It has been recognized as a Google Workspace Editor's Choice app and rated highly on G2 and Capterra for combining flexibility with a clean, uncluttered interface.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Project Management
Task & To-Do
Best for
Small to mid-size teams needing task, meeting, and risk management in one tool
Teams and organizations of all sizes needing structured, nested task management
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
No
Yes
key integrations
1,000+ apps via Zapier
Google Calendar, Google Drive, Slack
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Includes risk management and issue tracking not found in many competitors
  • Low entry price on paid tiers ($3-$8/user/month)
  • Free plan covers small teams up to 5 members
  • Meeting management is built in, not a separate add-on
  • Free plan is genuinely usable for small teams
  • Nested task structure suits complex, multi-layered projects
  • Multiple views (Kanban, Gantt, calendar) from one data set
  • Clean interface compared to heavier project management tools
Cons
  • Free tier is capped at 5 team members
  • Interface and feature depth can feel less polished than larger competitors
  • Enterprise pricing is not published
  • Some of the most useful views (timeline, calendar) require a paid plan
  • Free plan caps projects and tasks fairly low for growing teams
  • Per-member pricing can add up for larger organizations
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to nTask

View all →
Zenkit
Zenkit

All-in-one work and project management platform with Kanban, Gantt, chat, and 100+ report views.

Compare
worklenz
worklenz

All‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies

Compare
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.com

AI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability

Compare

Alternatives to Quire

View all →
Zenkit
Zenkit

All-in-one work and project management platform with Kanban, Gantt, chat, and 100+ report views.

Compare
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare
nTask
nTask

All-in-one task and project management platform with Gantt, risk, and issue tracking.

Compare
Vikunja
Vikunja

Open-source task manager with List, Kanban, Gantt, and Table views, self-hosted or cloud.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Quire offers richer native views and nested task structures, while nTask adds risk/issue tracking and broader Zapier integrations; choose based on whether deep task hierarchy or extended governance features matter more.

Key differences

  • •Quire provides infinitely nested sub‑tasks and multiple native views (Kanban, Gantt, calendar, timeline) from one data set; nTask does not support nested tasks.
  • •nTask includes dedicated risk management, issue tracking, and meeting management modules; Quire lacks these features.
  • •Quire’s API is available for custom extensions, whereas nTask does not offer an API.
  • •nTask connects to 1,000+ apps via Zapier; Quire’s listed integrations are limited to Google Calendar, Drive, and Slack.
  • •Free plan limits: Quire’s free tier caps projects/tasks but is usable for small teams; nTask’s free tier caps team size at 5 members.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are freemium, but Quire’s free plan is usable for small teams without a member cap, while nTask caps at 5 users.

Quire

Ease of use / learning curve

Quire’s clean interface and unified views are noted as less heavy than larger tools; nTask’s interface is described as less polished.

Quire

Features & depth

nTask adds risk, issue, and meeting management modules not present in Quire.

nTask

Integrations & ecosystem

nTask offers Zapier access to 1,000+ apps; Quire lists only three native integrations.

nTask

Collaboration

Quire includes collaborative documents, comments, and real‑time sync with Google Calendar; nTask’s collaboration is limited to chat/comments.

Quire

Scalability

nTask’s paid plans have lower per‑user pricing and no per‑member cap, while Quire’s per‑member cost can add up for large orgs.

nTask

Support & API

Quire provides an API for custom integration; nTask does not offer an API.

Quire

Choose nTask if…

Teams that require risk/issue tracking, meeting tools, and extensive Zapier integrations.

Choose Quire if…

Teams needing deep task hierarchy, multiple native views, and API access.

Common questions

Can I use either tool for free with unlimited users?

Quire’s free plan has no user cap but limits projects/tasks; nTask’s free plan caps at 5 members.

Do both products integrate with my existing Google Workspace?

Quire integrates directly with Google Calendar and Drive; nTask relies on Zapier for Google integrations.

Is there an API for building custom integrations?

Quire offers an API; nTask does not provide an API.