Harvest vs Paymo
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Harvest is a time tracking platform built for professional services teams who need to log billable hours and turn them directly into client invoices. A simple timer, timesheet, and calendar-based tracking make it easy for teams to capture time, while automated invoice generation pulls tracked hours and expenses straight into a client-ready bill. Beyond tracking, Harvest provides project profitability and team utilization reporting so agency owners and managers can see which clients and projects are actually profitable. It integrates with accounting tools like QuickBooks and Xero and payment processors like Stripe, and is used by advertising agencies, architecture firms, law practices, and consultancies.
Paymo is a work management tool aimed at freelancers, agencies, and small businesses that need to track billable time and turn it directly into invoices without switching tools. It combines task views (Kanban, calendar, spreadsheet), Gantt charts and team scheduling, with built-in invoicing, estimates, and online payment collection.
- Simple, fast time entry that teams actually adopt
- Invoicing flows directly from tracked time without re-entering data
- Strong profitability and utilization reporting for services firms
- Free plan available for solo users on a small scale
- Combines time tracking, project management, and invoicing in one subscription
- Desktop apps for Windows, macOS, and Linux (less common among competitors)
- Affordable entry pricing for freelancers and small teams
- Built-in online payment collection through invoices
- Free plan is limited to 1 seat and 2 projects
- Advanced reporting and SSO require the pricier Enterprise tier
- Not a full project management tool, mainly focused on time and billing
- Free plan is limited to 1 user and 2 projects
- Higher-end scheduling and Gantt features require the top Pro tier
- Introductory pricing reverts to higher regular rates after 3 months
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Harvest
View all →Alternatives to Paymo
View all →Time tracking and invoicing software that turns tracked hours into client invoices and profitability reports.

Open‑source task manager that blends time tracking, kanban and agile planning for freelancers and small teams.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataHarvest excels at simple time‑tracking and invoicing with strong profitability reporting for professional services, while Paymo adds full task‑management and Gantt scheduling for freelancers and small teams.
Key differences
- •Harvest focuses on time‑tracking and billing with robust profit and utilization reports; Paymo combines time‑tracking with full project‑management tools (Kanban, Gantt, task boards).
- •Harvest’s free tier supports solo users with 1 seat and 2 projects; Paymo’s free tier has the same limits but adds desktop apps for Windows, macOS, Linux.
- •Harvest integrates with accounting platforms like QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe; Paymo’s integrations are not listed beyond API availability.
- •Paymo offers built‑in online payment processing on invoices; Harvest relies on external payment integrations (Stripe, etc.).
- •Harvest’s reporting is geared toward margin by client/project; Paymo provides broader profitability analytics plus resource‑planning Gantt charts.
Pricing & value
Both offer freemium plans limited to 1 user and 2 projects; paid tiers differ but no price details provided.
Ease of use / learning curve
Harvest’s simple timer, timesheet, and calendar UI is described as fast and widely adopted; Paymo adds complex Gantt/task views.
Features & depth
Paymo includes task management, Kanban, Gantt, file proofing, client portals, and built‑in payment processing, beyond Harvest’s time‑billing focus.
Integrations & ecosystem
Harvest lists over 40 integrations (QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe, Asana, Slack); Paymo only mentions an API, no specific integrations.
Collaboration
Paymo provides shared client portals, file proofing, and team scheduling; Harvest’s collaboration is limited to time approval workflows.
Scalability
Harvest offers enterprise tier with SSO and advanced reporting for larger firms; Paymo’s higher‑end features require the top Pro tier but no enterprise tier mentioned.
Support
Harvest specifies email and Help Center support; Paymo’s support options are not detailed.
Choose Harvest if…
Professional services firms needing robust time‑tracking, invoicing, and profitability reporting with many accounting integrations.
Choose Paymo if…
Freelancers or small teams that want an all‑in‑one tool with task management, Gantt scheduling, and built‑in payment collection.
Common questions
Can I start for free and later upgrade?
Both Harvest and Paymo offer a freemium plan limited to 1 user and 2 projects; paid upgrades add more seats and features.
Which tool integrates with my accounting software?
Harvest lists integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe and over 40 other apps; Paymo only mentions an API, no specific accounting connectors.
Do they support online invoice payments?
Paymo includes built‑in online payment processing; Harvest relies on external integrations such as Stripe for payment collection.
