Everhour vs Harvest
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Everhour is a time tracking and project budgeting tool built to sit inside the project management app teams already use rather than replace it. Timers can be started directly from tasks in Asana, ClickUp, Linear, GitHub, Jira, Monday, Basecamp, Notion, or Trello, with time synced back automatically, and native web, mobile, and desktop apps cover the rest. On top of tracking, Everhour handles project budgets with automated alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% thresholds, converts tracked time into client invoices with configurable billing rates, and generates profitability and utilization reports. It also includes time-off management with automated PTO accrual, making it suited to agencies, consultancies, and professional services firms that need to track billable hours without switching tools.
Harvest is a time tracking platform built for professional services teams who need to log billable hours and turn them directly into client invoices. A simple timer, timesheet, and calendar-based tracking make it easy for teams to capture time, while automated invoice generation pulls tracked hours and expenses straight into a client-ready bill. Beyond tracking, Harvest provides project profitability and team utilization reporting so agency owners and managers can see which clients and projects are actually profitable. It integrates with accounting tools like QuickBooks and Xero and payment processors like Stripe, and is used by advertising agencies, architecture firms, law practices, and consultancies.
- Deep integration into existing PM tools instead of requiring a separate app
- Clear budget alert thresholds help catch overruns early
- Per-seat billing based on actual trackers, not total PM tool users
- Strong reporting for agencies billing clients by the hour
- Simple, fast time entry that teams actually adopt
- Invoicing flows directly from tracked time without re-entering data
- Strong profitability and utilization reporting for services firms
- Free plan available for solo users on a small scale
- Full feature set requires the paid Team plan beyond a single free user
- Best value depends on already using one of its supported PM integrations
- Invoicing is time-based only, not a full accounting or billing suite
- Free plan is limited to 1 seat and 2 projects
- Advanced reporting and SSO require the pricier Enterprise tier
- Not a full project management tool, mainly focused on time and billing
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Everhour
View all →
Automated time-tracking and focus tool to help you understand and improve your daily habits.
Alternatives to Harvest
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataHarvest is the safer default if you need a standalone time‑tracking and invoicing solution; Everhour shines only when you already use a supported project‑management tool and want embedded tracking.
Key differences
- •Harvest is a self‑contained app; Everhour lives inside PM tools like Asana, Jira, Trello.
- •Harvest includes full invoicing and accounting integrations (QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe); Everhour’s invoicing is time‑only and lacks accounting connectors.
- •Harvest’s free tier supports 1 seat and 2 projects, while Everhour’s free tier is limited to a single user without project limits.
- •Everhour bills per active tracker seat, whereas Harvest’s higher tiers are seat‑based but include SSO and advanced reporting.
- •Harvest offers 40+ integrations across finance and communication apps; Everhour focuses on deep PM‑tool integrations.
Pricing & value
Harvest free plan allows 1 seat and 2 projects, giving immediate value for solo users; Everhour free tier is single‑user only.
Ease of use / learning curve
Harvest’s simple timer, timesheet, and calendar UI is standalone; Everhour requires learning its embedded extensions within each PM tool.
Features & depth
Harvest provides full invoicing, multi‑tier billing rates, budget alerts, profitability and utilization reports; Everhour lacks full accounting features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Harvest lists over 40 integrations including QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe, Slack; Everhour integrates mainly with PM tools.
Scalability
Harvest offers Enterprise tier with SSO and advanced reporting for larger firms; Everhour scales per‑seat but remains tied to supported PM platforms.
Choose Everhour if…
Teams already using Asana, Jira, Trello, etc., wanting embedded tracking with per‑seat billing.
Choose Harvest if…
Professional services firms needing independent time‑tracking, invoicing, and robust profitability reporting.
Common questions
Can I generate client invoices directly from tracked time?
Yes in Harvest (full invoicing suite); Everhour can create invoices but only time‑based, no full accounting.
Do either tools integrate with my accounting software?
Harvest integrates with QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe; Everhour does not list accounting integrations.
What if my team uses multiple project‑management tools?
Harvest works independently of PM tools; Everhour only embeds in the specific PM apps it supports.