Float vs Teamwork.com
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Float is a resource management platform that gives teams a live view of staff availability, project assignments, and delivery status, so managers can plan capacity and reassign work without guesswork. It combines scheduling with time tracking, letting teams compare planned estimates against actual hours worked on each project. Beyond scheduling, Float provides project cost estimation, margin and budget dashboards, and AI-assisted staffing suggestions to help fill open project slots with the right people. It's used by agencies, consultancies, and studios that need to see delivery performance across many concurrent projects at once, and is trusted by 4,500+ firms with B Corp certification.
Teamwork.com integrates project management, resource planning, and financial tracking into one platform aimed squarely at agencies, consultancies, and other client-services teams. It covers client intake forms, task creation, team collaboration, and client approval workflows, alongside capacity planning, workload balancing, and utilization tracking for resourcing. Financial controls include budget tracking, time logging, cost management, profitability reporting, and billing rate setup, while AI features can auto-create projects from briefs, assign resources intelligently, and forecast profitability. The platform offers 150+ integrations including Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Xero, and Microsoft Outlook, plus web, iOS, and Android apps.
- Purpose-built for capacity planning rather than a general project management add-on
- Estimates-vs-actuals reporting gives clear visibility into project profitability
- 30-day free trial with no credit card required
- B Corp certified and well-established with 4,500+ customer firms
- Combines project delivery with financial and resourcing controls in one tool
- Purpose-built for agencies and professional services rather than generic teams
- AI features aim to reduce manual project setup and resourcing work
- Strong integration list covering CRM, accounting, and communication tools
- Per-person pricing can get expensive for larger teams needing the Pro tier
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation
- Focused on scheduling and capacity rather than task-level project management like Asana or Linear
- Pricing is not disclosed on the homepage and requires visiting the pricing page
- Feature depth aimed at client-services firms may be more than generic teams need
- Financial and profitability tooling adds a learning curve versus simpler PM tools
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Float
View all →
AI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability
Visual team calendar and timeline tool for planning projects and balancing workloads.
Alternatives to Teamwork.com
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataFloat excels at pure capacity‑planning with AI staffing and profitability dashboards, while Teamwork bundles broader project, billing, and client‑facing features.
Key differences
- •Float focuses on real‑time staff availability, estimates‑vs‑actuals and AI staffing recommendations; Teamwork adds client intake forms, AI scheduling, and integrated invoicing.
- •Float’s pricing is per‑person with a free 30‑day trial; Teamwork does not disclose pricing publicly and requires a sales conversation.
- •Float’s integrations are listed via Zapier and generic HR/financial tools; Teamwork offers 150+ native integrations including Slack, Salesforce, QuickBooks and Xero.
- •Float is purpose‑built for capacity planning rather than task‑level project management; Teamwork combines full project management, budgeting and client‑feedback features in one suite.
Pricing & value
Float offers a 30‑day free trial and per‑person pricing; Teamwork’s pricing isn’t disclosed, making cost comparison harder.
Ease of use / learning curve
Float’s narrower focus on scheduling reduces complexity versus Teamwork’s broader feature set.
Features & depth
Teamwork provides client intake, AI scheduling, budgeting, invoicing and proofing, beyond Float’s capacity‑planning core.
Integrations & ecosystem
Teamwork lists 150+ native integrations (Slack, Salesforce, QuickBooks, Xero); Float relies on Zapier and generic tools.
Collaboration
Teamwork includes shared client feedback/proofs and automated project creation; Float lacks explicit collaboration features.
Scalability
Both are cloud SaaS, support enterprise tiers, and have no open‑source constraints.
Support
Float specifies email and priority SLA support for enterprise; Teamwork’s support details are not provided.
Choose Float if…
Agencies needing pure capacity planning, real‑time staffing visibility, and clear profitability dashboards with transparent pricing.
Choose Teamwork.com if…
Agencies or professional services firms that want an all‑in‑one solution for project setup, client intake, billing and extensive integrations.
Common questions
Is there a free trial or transparent pricing?
Float offers a 30‑day free trial with no credit card; Teamwork does not disclose pricing on the homepage.
Which tool supports client‑facing feedback and invoicing?
Teamwork includes proofing, client intake forms, and built‑in billing rate and invoicing features; Float does not.
Do both tools integrate with my existing accounting software?
Teamwork has native QuickBooks and Xero integrations; Float connects via Zapier to financial tools but no direct native link.