FindAlternative
Back to Teamwork.com

Teamwork.com vs Wrake

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Teamwork.com
Teamwork.comAI-powered project and resource management built for client-services profitability
Wrake
WrakeCollaborative work management platform for teams of any size
Overview
Description

Teamwork.com integrates project management, resource planning, and financial tracking into one platform aimed squarely at agencies, consultancies, and other client-services teams. It covers client intake forms, task creation, team collaboration, and client approval workflows, alongside capacity planning, workload balancing, and utilization tracking for resourcing. Financial controls include budget tracking, time logging, cost management, profitability reporting, and billing rate setup, while AI features can auto-create projects from briefs, assign resources intelligently, and forecast profitability. The platform offers 150+ integrations including Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Xero, and Microsoft Outlook, plus web, iOS, and Android apps.

Wrike is an enterprise‑grade work management solution that lets teams plan, track, and collaborate on projects in real time. Its visual dashboards, customizable workflows, and built‑in reporting give managers 360° visibility into progress and bottlenecks. The platform integrates with popular productivity tools, supports agile methodologies, and offers AI‑assisted task prioritization to help teams stay aligned and deliver faster.

Pricing
Freemium
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Project Management
Project Management
Best for
Agencies and professional services teams billing clients for project work
Enterprises and growing teams
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
key integrations
Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Xero, Microsoft Outlook
Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, Jira, Google Drive, Dropbox
api available
—
Yes
support options
—
Email, Live Chat, Phone, Knowledge Base
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Combines project delivery with financial and resourcing controls in one tool
  • Purpose-built for agencies and professional services rather than generic teams
  • AI features aim to reduce manual project setup and resourcing work
  • Strong integration list covering CRM, accounting, and communication tools
  • Highly customizable workflows
  • Robust reporting and analytics
  • Extensive third‑party integrations
  • Strong support for agile methodologies
Cons
  • Pricing is not disclosed on the homepage and requires visiting the pricing page
  • Feature depth aimed at client-services firms may be more than generic teams need
  • Financial and profitability tooling adds a learning curve versus simpler PM tools
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced features
  • Free tier limited in storage and automation
  • Interface can feel cluttered with many modules
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Teamwork.com

View all →
worklenz
worklenz

All‑in‑one open‑source project management for teams and agencies

Compare
Hive
Hive

AI-powered work management platform combining projects, chat, CRM, and automation.

Compare
Wrake
Wrake

Collaborative work management platform for teams of any size

Compare
Float
Float

Resource scheduling and capacity planning software that shows who's working on what and what's next.

Compare

Alternatives to Wrake

View all →
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare
Asana
Asana

Work management for teams to plan and track projects.

Compare
Hive
Hive

AI-powered work management platform combining projects, chat, CRM, and automation.

Compare
Zenkit
Zenkit

All-in-one work and project management platform with Kanban, Gantt, chat, and 100+ report views.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Teamwork.com is a paid, agency‑focused solution with built‑in profitability and resource tools, while Wrake offers a freemium, highly customizable platform for broader teams.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model: Teamwork is subscription‑only (price not disclosed publicly); Wrake has a free tier with paid upgrades.
  • •Target audience: Teamwork is purpose‑built for agencies/professional services; Wrake targets enterprises and generic growing teams.
  • •Financial features: Teamwork includes budgeting, cost tracking, and client billing; Wrake lacks dedicated profitability tools.
  • •Workflow customization: Wrake provides drag‑and‑drop workflow builder and AI task prioritization; Teamwork’s workflows are more fixed around client intake.
  • •Integration breadth: Both have strong lists, but Wrake mentions >400 SaaS apps and API access, whereas Teamwork lists ~150 specific integrations.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Wrake offers a freemium tier; Teamwork requires paid subscription with undisclosed pricing.

Wrake

Ease of use / learning curve

Teamwork’s agency‑specific UI is less modular, likely easier for its niche; Wrake’s deep customization adds complexity.

Teamwork.com

Features & depth

Teamwork includes budgeting, cost management, and client billing, which Wrake does not provide.

Teamwork.com

Integrations & ecosystem

Wrake cites integration with >400 apps and an open API; Teamwork lists ~150 specific integrations.

Wrake

Collaboration

Both provide task assignment, comments, and document collaboration features.

Tie

Scalability

Wrake targets enterprises and growing teams, suggesting broader scalability than Teamwork’s agency focus.

Wrake

Support

Wrake lists multiple support channels (email, live chat, phone, knowledge base); Teamwork’s support details not provided.

Wrake

Choose Teamwork.com if…

Agencies or professional services needing built‑in budgeting, billing, and resource profitability.

Choose Wrake if…

Enterprises or growing teams wanting free entry, extensive custom workflows, and broader integration options.

Common questions

Does either tool include client invoicing and budgeting?

Teamwork includes budget tracking, cost management, and billing rate setup; Wrake does not mention invoicing features.

Can I start using the product for free?

Wrake offers a freemium tier; Teamwork requires a paid subscription with pricing not shown on the homepage.

Which platform has more third‑party integrations?

Wrake lists integration with over 400 SaaS applications and provides an API; Teamwork lists about 150 specific integrations.