Everhour vs TimeCamp
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Everhour is a time tracking and project budgeting tool built to sit inside the project management app teams already use rather than replace it. Timers can be started directly from tasks in Asana, ClickUp, Linear, GitHub, Jira, Monday, Basecamp, Notion, or Trello, with time synced back automatically, and native web, mobile, and desktop apps cover the rest. On top of tracking, Everhour handles project budgets with automated alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% thresholds, converts tracked time into client invoices with configurable billing rates, and generates profitability and utilization reports. It also includes time-off management with automated PTO accrual, making it suited to agencies, consultancies, and professional services firms that need to track billable hours without switching tools.
TimeCamp is a time tracking platform used by 18,000+ teams that combines automatic and manual tracking with an AI Time Tracking Agent that monitors app and website usage and intelligently assigns logged time to the correct projects. It also covers timesheet approvals, project profitability analysis, client invoicing, and attendance/overtime tracking.
- Deep integration into existing PM tools instead of requiring a separate app
- Clear budget alert thresholds help catch overruns early
- Per-seat billing based on actual trackers, not total PM tool users
- Strong reporting for agencies billing clients by the hour
- AI Agent reduces manual project-tagging effort
- Generous free plan with unlimited users/projects
- Affordable entry-level paid tiers starting under $4/user
- Serves 18,000+ teams across 102 countries with strong reviews
- Full feature set requires the paid Team plan beyond a single free user
- Best value depends on already using one of its supported PM integrations
- Invoicing is time-based only, not a full accounting or billing suite
- Full automatic categorization accuracy depends on activity naming conventions
- Advanced features like custom fields require the top Ultimate tier
- Desktop app permissions (screen/activity monitoring) may concern privacy-sensitive teams
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Everhour
View all →Automated time-tracking and focus tool to help you understand and improve your daily habits.
Alternatives to TimeCamp
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataTimeCamp offers a generous free tier with AI‑driven automatic tracking, while Everhour excels at deep native integrations and per‑seat billing for teams already using supported PM tools.
Key differences
- •AI‑based automatic time categorization (TimeCamp) vs. timer embedded directly in PM tasks (Everhour)
- •Free plan: unlimited users/projects (TimeCamp) vs. single free user only (Everhour)
- •Budget alerts and utilization reporting built‑in (Everhour) vs. project profitability analysis tied to costs/budgets (TimeCamp)
- •Invoicing scope: TimeCamp creates full client invoices; Everhour only converts tracked time to invoices
- •Integration breadth: Everhour supports more PM tools (Linear, GitHub, Monday, Basecamp, Notion) whereas TimeCamp lists fewer (Asana, Trello, Jira, QuickBooks)
Pricing & value
TimeCamp’s free tier supports unlimited users/projects; Everhour’s free tier limited to one user.
Ease of use / learning curve
Everhour embeds timers inside existing PM tasks, avoiding a separate app; TimeCamp requires installing and configuring an AI agent.
Features & depth
Both provide invoicing and profitability reporting, but TimeCamp adds attendance/overtime tracking; Everhour adds budget alerts and utilization dashboards.
Integrations & ecosystem
Everhour integrates with six PM tools plus Monday, Basecamp, Notion; TimeCamp lists only Asana, Trello, Jira, QuickBooks.
Collaboration
TimeCamp’s unlimited‑user free plan enables whole teams to adopt instantly; Everhour charges per active tracker.
Scalability
TimeCamp’s cloud SaaS and unlimited user capacity scale easily; Everhour’s per‑seat model can become costly at large team sizes.
Support & security
Both offer email/help‑center support; privacy concerns noted for TimeCamp’s screen‑monitoring agent, but no security details for Everhour.
Choose Everhour if…
Agencies already using supported PM tools that want embedded timers and per‑seat billing.
Choose TimeCamp if…
Teams needing automatic AI tagging and a zero‑cost unlimited user plan.
Common questions
Can I use the free version for a team of 10?
Yes, TimeCamp’s free plan supports unlimited users; Everhour’s free tier is limited to one user.
Do either tools require a separate desktop app?
TimeCamp uses a desktop AI agent for activity monitoring; Everhour offers a browser extension and native apps but no mandatory desktop monitor.
Which solution provides budget‑overrun alerts?
Everhour sends automated alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% of project budget thresholds; TimeCamp does not specify such alerts.

