FindAlternative
Back to Cap

Cap vs ScreenRec

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cap
CapBeautiful, shareable screen recordings
Visit
ScreenRec
ScreenRecFree screen recorder and screenshot tool with instant shareable links and voice dictation
Visit
Overview
Description

Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom, allowing users to create beautiful and shareable screen recordings. It provides a simple and intuitive way to record and share knowledge, ideas, and feedback.

ScreenRec is a lightweight screen recording and screenshot tool that lets users capture their screen, webcam, and audio, then instantly generate a shareable link without uploading to a third-party host. It also includes a voice dictation feature that converts spoken audio into text, aimed at speeding up explanations and quick tutorials.

Pricing
Freemium

Free for personal use (Studio Mode, 4K/60fps export, 5-minute shareable links). Paid: Desktop License $29/year (single-user commercial licence, unlimited local recording), Cap Pro $12/user/month (unlimited cloud storage & bandwidth, AI titles/summaries/transcription, team workspaces), and Enterprise with custom pricing (SAML SSO, SLAs, managed self-hosting).

Freemium
Category
Screen Recorders
Screen Recorders
Best for
Remote teams and individuals
Individuals and small teams needing quick screen recordings with instant sharing
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
No
github stars
20,379
—
api available
No
No
support options
Discord, GitHub Issues
Email, Priority Support (paid tiers)
primary language
TypeScript
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Open-source with a free tier
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • High-quality video and audio recordings
  • Customizable recording settings
  • Genuinely useful free tier with unlimited recording length and no watermark
  • Instant link sharing removes the need for a separate video host
  • Voice dictation is a distinctive feature not common in competing tools
  • Available across Windows, Mac, and Linux
Cons
  • Editing is aimed at screen recordings rather than general-purpose video production
  • Desktop apps are available for macOS and Windows only — there is no native Linux client
  • Team workspaces, custom domains and analytics are tied to Cap's cloud or to a self-hosted instance you run yourself
  • Free tier is capped at 720p resolution
  • Higher-tier team plan pricing is steep for smaller users needing more seats
  • No dedicated mobile app for recording on phones or tablets
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cap

View all →
Focalboard
Focalboard

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
OBS Studio
OBS Studio

Free and open source software for video recording and live streaming

Compare
Docmost
Docmost

Open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software

Compare

Alternatives to ScreenRec

View all →
Kap
Kap

Open-source Mac screen recorder that exports directly to GIF, MP4, WebM, and APNG.

Compare
ScreenPal
ScreenPal

Screen and webcam recording with AI-enhanced editing for teams and educators

Compare
Cap
Cap

Beautiful, shareable screen recordings

Compare
Loom
Loom

Create and share video messages instantly for faster communication.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

ScreenRec offers a free, unlimited‑recording desktop tool with instant link sharing and voice dictation, while Cap provides open‑source, higher‑quality recording with built‑in editing and cloud/S3 storage but limited to macOS/Windows.

Key differences

  • •ScreenRec includes built‑in voice dictation; Cap does not.
  • •Cap is open‑source and offers a self‑hostable S3‑compatible storage option; ScreenRec is closed source.
  • •Cap provides a full‑featured local editor (Studio Mode) and AI‑generated titles, chapters and transcripts; ScreenRec lacks editing beyond basic pause/resume.
  • •ScreenRec supports Linux; Cap only macOS and Windows desktop clients.
  • •ScreenRec’s free tier has unlimited length but caps resolution at 720p; Cap’s free tier limits recordings to 5 minutes but offers 4K/60 fps export.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

ScreenRec’s freemium tier is unlimited length with no watermark; Cap’s free tier limits recordings to 5 minutes.

ScreenRec

Ease of use / learning curve

ScreenRec’s instant link sharing and simple UI require minimal setup; Cap adds editing steps and AI features.

ScreenRec

Features & depth

Cap includes Studio Mode editing, AI titles/chapters/transcripts and flexible storage; ScreenRec focuses on capture and basic analytics.

Cap

Integrations & ecosystem

Cap can store recordings in S3‑compatible buckets or self‑hosted cloud; ScreenRec offers no API or external storage integration.

Cap

Collaboration

Cap provides team workspaces, comments, reactions, and viewer analytics; ScreenRec only tracks basic view counts.

Cap

Scalability

Cap’s self‑hosted S3 option and cloud workspaces scale for larger teams; ScreenRec’s paid team plan is noted as steep.

Cap

Support

ScreenRec offers email support and priority paid support; Cap relies on Discord and GitHub Issues only.

ScreenRec

Choose Cap if…

Remote teams that need high‑quality 4K/60 fps recordings, AI‑generated metadata, editing, and flexible cloud or self‑hosted storage.

Choose ScreenRec if…

Individuals or small teams needing unlimited free recordings, Linux support, and instant sharing without advanced editing.

Common questions

Can I record in 4K for free?

ScreenRec’s free tier caps at 720p; Cap’s free tier allows 4K/60 fps export but limits recordings to 5 minutes.

Is there a Linux desktop client?

ScreenRec provides a Linux desktop app; Cap only offers macOS and Windows clients.

Do either tool offer an API for automation?

Both products list “Api Available: No” in their specifications.