Loom vs ScreenRec
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Loom lets you record your screen, webcam, or both in a single click, then instantly generate a shareable link. It’s designed to replace long emails and meetings with concise visual explanations. The platform includes viewer analytics, team libraries, and integrations with popular work tools, making it easy for remote teams, educators, and salespeople to create on‑demand tutorials, demos, and feedback loops.
ScreenRec is a lightweight screen recording and screenshot tool that lets users capture their screen, webcam, and audio, then instantly generate a shareable link without uploading to a third-party host. It also includes a voice dictation feature that converts spoken audio into text, aimed at speeding up explanations and quick tutorials.
- Fast video creation
- Easy sharing via link
- Built‑in analytics
- Integrates with many workplace tools
- Genuinely useful free tier with unlimited recording length and no watermark
- Instant link sharing removes the need for a separate video host
- Voice dictation is a distinctive feature not common in competing tools
- Available across Windows, Mac, and Linux
- Limited editing features compared to dedicated video editors
- Free tier caps monthly recording minutes
- Desktop app can be heavy on resources
- Free tier is capped at 720p resolution
- Higher-tier team plan pricing is steep for smaller users needing more seats
- No dedicated mobile app for recording on phones or tablets
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Loom
View all →
Alternatives to ScreenRec
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataLoom offers richer collaboration features and analytics for teams, while ScreenRec provides unlimited free recording and unique voice‑dictation but fewer integrations.
Key differences
- •Loom includes built‑in analytics and team libraries; ScreenRec only offers basic view counts.
- •ScreenRec’s free tier has unlimited recording length, but caps resolution at 720p; Loom’s free tier limits monthly minutes.
- •Loom integrates with Slack, Gmail, Notion, and Microsoft Teams; ScreenRec has no listed integrations.
- •ScreenRec adds voice‑dictation and screenshot annotation; Loom focuses on video editing and sharing.
- •Loom provides a cloud SaaS platform; ScreenRec is a desktop‑only app.
Pricing & value
ScreenRec’s free tier offers unlimited recording length; Loom’s free tier caps monthly minutes.
Ease of use / learning curve
ScreenRec is a simple desktop app with instant link sharing; Loom adds cloud UI and editing steps.
Features & depth
Loom provides analytics, team libraries, and multi‑tool integrations; ScreenRec lacks these advanced features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Loom lists integrations with Slack, Gmail, Notion, Microsoft Teams; ScreenRec lists none.
Collaboration
Loom’s team libraries, permission controls, and analytics support coordinated team use; ScreenRec is more individual‑focused.
Scalability
Loom’s cloud SaaS model scales across users and departments; ScreenRec is limited to desktop installations.
Support
Loom offers live chat and help center; ScreenRec only provides email and paid priority support.
Choose Loom if…
Teams needing analytics, shared libraries, and integrations with workplace tools.
Choose ScreenRec if…
Individuals or small groups wanting unlimited free recordings and voice dictation on desktop.
Common questions
Which tool allows unlimited recording length for free?
ScreenRec’s free tier offers unlimited recording length; Loom’s free tier caps monthly minutes.
Do either of the tools integrate with Slack or Microsoft Teams?
Loom integrates with Slack, Gmail, Notion, and Microsoft Teams; ScreenRec lists no integrations.
Is there built‑in analytics to see who watched a video?
Loom provides viewer analytics (who watched, duration, re‑watched parts); ScreenRec only tracks basic view count and watch duration.