FindAlternative
Back to Cap

Cap vs Focalboard

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cap
CapBeautiful, shareable screen recordings
Focalboard
FocalboardOpen-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion
Overview
Description

Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom, allowing users to create beautiful and shareable screen recordings. It provides a simple and intuitive way to record and share knowledge, ideas, and feedback.

Focalboard is a project management and organization tool that allows users to create boards, lists, and cards to track their work. It's designed to be flexible and customizable, with features like drag-and-drop card movement and customizable workflows. Focalboard is built on top of the Mattermost platform, which means it integrates seamlessly with Mattermost's team messaging and collaboration features.

Pricing
Freemium

Free for personal use (Studio Mode, 4K/60fps export, 5-minute shareable links). Paid: Desktop License $29/year (single-user commercial licence, unlimited local recording), Cap Pro $12/user/month (unlimited cloud storage & bandwidth, AI titles/summaries/transcription, team workspaces), and Enterprise with custom pricing (SAML SSO, SLAs, managed self-hosting).

Free
Category
Screen Recorders
Project Management
Best for
Remote teams and individuals
Development teams and organizations
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
20,379
26,296+29%
api available
No
Yes
support options
Discord, GitHub Issues
Community support, Email support
primary language
TypeScript
TypeScript
key integrations
Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Open-source with a free tier
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • High-quality video and audio recordings
  • Customizable recording settings
  • Highly customizable and flexible
  • Integrates well with Mattermost team messaging and collaboration platform
  • Self-hosted, so you have full control over your data
  • Open-source, so you can customize and extend the platform
Cons
  • Editing is aimed at screen recordings rather than general-purpose video production
  • Desktop apps are available for macOS and Windows only — there is no native Linux client
  • Team workspaces, custom domains and analytics are tied to Cap's cloud or to a self-hosted instance you run yourself
  • Can be overwhelming for small teams or simple projects
  • Requires technical expertise to set up and customize
  • Limited mobile app support
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
1
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cap

View all →
ShareX
ShareX

Capture, upload, and share your screen with ease

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
Docmost
Docmost

Open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software

Compare
Recordly
Recordly

Create polished demo videos without editing skills

Compare

Alternatives to Focalboard

View all →
Trello
Trello

Simple, visual kanban boards for organizing anything.

Compare
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare
Monday.com
Monday.com

Visual work OS for teams and workflows.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Focalboard is a free, self‑hosted, open‑source project‑management board for development teams, while Cap is a freemium screen‑recording tool focused on video creation and sharing.

Key differences

  • Primary purpose: task/kanban management (Focalboard) vs screen recording and video sharing (Cap).
  • Deployment model: self‑hosted server (Focalboard) vs desktop app with optional cloud/self‑hosted storage (Cap).
  • Integration focus: Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab (Focalboard) vs no native integrations, only video sharing links (Cap).
  • Pricing structure: completely free (Focalboard) vs tiered freemium with paid licenses for advanced features (Cap).
  • Support channels: community/email (Focalboard) vs Discord/GitHub Issues only (Cap).
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Focalboard is fully free; Cap requires paid licenses for commercial use and advanced features.

Focalboard

Ease of use / learning curve

Cap offers an intuitive UI for recording; Focalboard can be overwhelming and needs technical setup.

Cap

Features & depth

Focalboard provides full project‑management boards, customizable workflows, and integrations; Cap is limited to screen‑recording features.

Focalboard

Integrations & ecosystem

Focalboard integrates with Mattermost, GitHub, GitLab; Cap has no listed integrations.

Focalboard

Collaboration

Focalboard supports @mentions, comments, and Mattermost integration for team collaboration; Cap’s collaboration is limited to video comments/reactions.

Focalboard

Scalability

Self‑hosted Focalboard can scale with your infrastructure; Cap’s cloud features are limited by paid tiers.

Focalboard

Support

Focalboard offers community and email support; Cap only provides Discord and GitHub Issues.

Focalboard

Security & privacy

Focalboard is self‑hosted, giving full data control; Cap stores recordings in cloud unless you self‑host.

Focalboard

Choose Cap if…

Remote workers or teams needing easy screen‑recording and video sharing.

Choose Focalboard if…

Development teams needing self‑hosted, customizable task boards.

Common questions

Can I use either tool for free?

Focalboard is completely free; Cap is free for personal use but commercial features require paid licenses.

Do I need technical expertise to get started?

Focalboard requires self‑hosting setup and technical knowledge; Cap runs as a desktop app with no server setup.

Which product integrates with my existing development tools?

Focalboard integrates with Mattermost, GitHub, and GitLab; Cap has no native integrations.