FindAlternative
Back to Cap

Cap vs Loom

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cap
CapBeautiful, shareable screen recordings
Loom
LoomCreate and share video messages instantly for faster communication.
Overview
Description

Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom, allowing users to create beautiful and shareable screen recordings. It provides a simple and intuitive way to record and share knowledge, ideas, and feedback.

Loom lets you record your screen, webcam, or both in a single click, then instantly generate a shareable link. It’s designed to replace long emails and meetings with concise visual explanations. The platform includes viewer analytics, team libraries, and integrations with popular work tools, making it easy for remote teams, educators, and salespeople to create on‑demand tutorials, demos, and feedback loops.

Pricing
Freemium

Free for personal use (Studio Mode, 4K/60fps export, 5-minute shareable links). Paid: Desktop License $29/year (single-user commercial licence, unlimited local recording), Cap Pro $12/user/month (unlimited cloud storage & bandwidth, AI titles/summaries/transcription, team workspaces), and Enterprise with custom pricing (SAML SSO, SLAs, managed self-hosting).

Freemium
Category
Screen Recorders
Screen Recorders
Best for
Remote teams and individuals
Remote teams and educators
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
20,379
—
api available
No
Yes
support options
Discord, GitHub Issues
Email, Live Chat, Help Center
primary language
TypeScript
—
key integrations
—
Slack, Gmail, Notion, Microsoft Teams
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Open-source with a free tier
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • High-quality video and audio recordings
  • Customizable recording settings
  • Fast video creation
  • Easy sharing via link
  • Built‑in analytics
  • Integrates with many workplace tools
Cons
  • Editing is aimed at screen recordings rather than general-purpose video production
  • Desktop apps are available for macOS and Windows only — there is no native Linux client
  • Team workspaces, custom domains and analytics are tied to Cap's cloud or to a self-hosted instance you run yourself
  • Limited editing features compared to dedicated video editors
  • Free tier caps monthly recording minutes
  • Desktop app can be heavy on resources
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cap

View all →
Focalboard
Focalboard

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
OBS Studio
OBS Studio

Free and open source software for video recording and live streaming

Compare
Docmost
Docmost

Open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software

Compare

Alternatives to Loom

View all →
Cap
Cap

Beautiful, shareable screen recordings

Compare
Screenleap
Screenleap

Instant, install-free screen sharing for sales demos, support calls, and online training.

Compare
ScreenPal
ScreenPal

Screen and webcam recording with AI-enhanced editing for teams and educators

Compare
SnapX
SnapX

Capture and share your screen instantly

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Loom offers a cloud‑based, link‑sharing video tool with strong integrations and analytics, while Cap provides an open‑source, high‑quality desktop recorder with more local control but fewer integrations.

Key differences

  • •Loom is SaaS with built‑in cloud storage and analytics; Cap is a desktop‑only app with optional self‑hosted storage.
  • •Cap is open‑source and allows local or S3‑compatible storage; Loom is proprietary and stores videos in its cloud.
  • •Loom integrates with Slack, Gmail, Notion, Microsoft Teams; Cap’s integrations are limited to its own sharing links.
  • •Loom provides an API for automation; Cap does not offer an API.
  • •Support channels differ: Loom offers email, live chat, help center; Cap relies on Discord and GitHub Issues.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both offer freemium tiers; specific limits not detailed, so value cannot be compared beyond free availability.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Loom’s single‑click recording and link sharing is described as fast and easy; Cap requires installing a desktop app.

Loom

Features & depth

Loom includes viewer analytics, team libraries, and a web editor; Cap’s editing is limited to screen‑recording enhancements.

Loom

Integrations & ecosystem

Loom lists integrations with Slack, Gmail, Notion, Microsoft Teams; Cap lists no comparable third‑party integrations.

Loom

Collaboration

Loom provides team libraries, permission controls, and analytics; Cap’s collaboration features are limited to link sharing and comments.

Loom

Scalability

Loom’s cloud SaaS model scales automatically; Cap relies on self‑hosted storage or Cap Cloud, requiring user management.

Loom

Support

Loom offers email, live chat, and a help center; Cap only provides Discord and GitHub Issues.

Loom

Choose Cap if…

Tech‑savvy users or teams wanting open‑source software, local storage control, and high‑quality recordings.

Choose Loom if…

Remote teams needing easy sharing, analytics, and integrations with existing workplace tools.

Common questions

Can I integrate the video tool with Slack or Microsoft Teams?

Yes for Loom (integrates with Slack, Gmail, Notion, Microsoft Teams); Cap does not list such integrations.

Is there an API to automate video workflows?

Loom provides an API; Cap does not offer an API.

Do either tools allow self‑hosting of video files?

Cap supports storing recordings in an S3‑compatible bucket or self‑hosted instance; Loom stores videos in its cloud only.