FigJam vs Miro
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
FigJam is Figma's collaborative online whiteboard, used for brainstorming, sticky-note workshops, flowcharts, and diagramming alongside Figma's design files in the same workspace. It allows teams to collaborate in real-time, making it easier to generate and organize ideas.
Miro is a cloud‑based visual collaboration platform that lets teams create, share, and iterate on ideas using an infinite canvas. It supports real‑time editing, sticky notes, diagrams, and a rich library of templates to accelerate brainstorming, planning, and design sessions. The platform integrates with popular productivity tools, offers native mobile apps, and provides granular permission controls, making it suitable for remote teams, educators, and enterprises seeking a unified visual workspace.
- Real-time collaboration and feedback
- Seamless integration with Figma design files
- Customizable templates and tools
- Web-based interface for easy access
- Intuitive drag‑and‑drop interface
- Extensive template library
- Strong integrations with popular SaaS tools
- Real‑time collaboration across devices
- Limited offline functionality
- Dependent on Figma account for full features
- Limited export options
- Steep learning curve for some users
- Performance can lag on very large boards
- Advanced features require paid subscription
- Limited offline functionality
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to FigJam
View all →
Alternatives to Miro
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMiro offers a free tier and broader integration ecosystem, while FigJam excels with native Figma integration but lacks clear pricing.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: Miro has a freemium tier; FigJam pricing is unknown.
- •Native design workflow: FigJam integrates directly with Figma files; Miro does not.
- •Template breadth: Miro provides an extensive library for agile and brainstorming; FigJam mentions customizable templates but fewer details.
- •Support channels: Miro adds a Help Center and Community Forum; FigJam only lists email and live chat.
- •Export options: Both export images/PDF, but Miro also supports PNG and iframe embedding.
Pricing & value
Miro offers a freemium plan; FigJam's pricing is listed as unknown.
Ease of use / learning curve
Miro described as intuitive drag‑and‑drop; FigJam notes a steep learning curve for some users.
Features & depth
Miro provides unlimited zoomable canvas, extensive template library, and video chat; FigJam focuses on sticky notes and basic flowcharts.
Integrations & ecosystem
Miro lists integrations with Slack, Teams, Jira, Confluence, Google Drive, Notion; FigJam lists only Figma, Slack, Google Drive.
Collaboration
Both support real‑time editing, permissions, and chat‑like interactions.
Support
Miro adds Help Center and Community Forum in addition to email/live chat; FigJam offers only email and live chat.
Security & privacy
Both are cloud SaaS with no open‑source claims; no specific security details provided.
Choose FigJam if…
Design teams already using Figma who need tight file integration.
Choose Miro if…
Remote or visual teams needing a free entry point and many SaaS integrations.
Common questions
Which tool has a free tier?
Miro offers a freemium plan; FigJam's pricing is not specified.
Can I edit Figma designs directly in the whiteboard?
Yes, FigJam integrates with Figma files; Miro does not provide native Figma integration.
What export formats are available?
FigJam exports images or PDFs; Miro exports PDFs, PNGs, and can embed boards via iframe.