FigJam vs Mural
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
FigJam is Figma's collaborative online whiteboard, used for brainstorming, sticky-note workshops, flowcharts, and diagramming alongside Figma's design files in the same workspace. It allows teams to collaborate in real-time, making it easier to generate and organize ideas.
Mural provides an online canvas where teams can brainstorm, map ideas, and run workshops together in real time. Its intuitive drag‑and‑drop interface supports sticky notes, diagrams, templates, and multimedia content. Designed for remote and hybrid work, Mural integrates with popular productivity suites, enabling seamless facilitation of strategy sessions, design sprints, and agile ceremonies across any device.
- Real-time collaboration and feedback
- Seamless integration with Figma design files
- Customizable templates and tools
- Web-based interface for easy access
- Intuitive drag‑and‑drop interface
- Robust library of workshop templates
- Strong integrations with enterprise tools
- Real‑time collaboration with facilitation controls
- Limited offline functionality
- Dependent on Figma account for full features
- Limited export options
- Steep learning curve for some users
- Free tier limits number of active boards
- Performance can lag on very large canvases
- No on‑premises deployment option
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to FigJam
View all →
Alternatives to Mural
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMural offers a free tier and broader enterprise integrations, while FigJam shines with native Figma integration but lacks clear pricing.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: Mural has a freemium tier; FigJam pricing is not specified.
- •Core integration: FigJam integrates directly with Figma; Mural focuses on Slack, Teams, Jira, Confluence.
- •Facilitation features: Mural includes cursor tracking, voting, and facilitator controls; FigJam does not mention these.
- •Export options: FigJam exports only image or PDF; Mural exports PDF, PNG, and CSV.
- •Deployment limits: Both are SaaS only; Mural explicitly lacks on‑premises option, FigJam does not mention it.
Pricing & value
Mural provides a freemium tier; FigJam's pricing is unknown, making Mural the clearer value choice.
Ease of use / learning curve
Mural is described as having an intuitive drag‑and‑drop interface; FigJam notes a steep learning curve for some users.
Features & depth
Mural offers facilitation mode, cursor tracking, voting, timers, and multiple export formats; FigJam focuses mainly on whiteboarding and Figma integration.
Integrations & ecosystem
Both provide Slack and Google Drive; FigJam adds Figma, Mural adds Teams, Jira, Confluence. Neither dominates overall.
Collaboration
FigJam emphasizes real‑time collaboration with customizable permissions and seamless Figma file co‑editing.
Scalability
Mural targets remote teams and enterprise facilitators, indicating design for larger, distributed groups.
Support
Mural offers email, live chat, and a knowledge base; FigJam lists only email and live chat.
Choose FigJam if…
Design teams already using Figma who need tight design‑file collaboration.
Choose Mural if…
Remote or enterprise teams needing free entry, robust facilitation tools, and many third‑party integrations.
Common questions
Which tool is cheaper to start with?
Mural offers a freemium tier; FigJam’s pricing is not disclosed, so Mural is the cheaper initial option.
Can I integrate directly with my existing design files?
FigJam integrates natively with Figma files; Mural does not list a Figma integration.
What export formats are available?
FigJam exports images or PDFs; Mural exports PDFs, PNGs, and CSVs, providing more options.