FindAlternative
Back to Hubstaff

Hubstaff vs TimeCamp

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Hubstaff
HubstaffTime tracking and workforce analytics platform built for remote and hybrid teams.
TimeCamp
TimeCampAI-powered time tracking that automatically assigns tracked time to the right projects.
Overview
Description

Hubstaff is a time tracking and workforce management platform for distributed teams, combining multi-device time tracking with productivity monitoring, project profitability insights, and automated global payments. GPS tracking supports field teams, while optional activity rates and screenshots give visibility into remote work.

TimeCamp is a time tracking platform used by 18,000+ teams that combines automatic and manual tracking with an AI Time Tracking Agent that monitors app and website usage and intelligently assigns logged time to the correct projects. It also covers timesheet approvals, project profitability analysis, client invoicing, and attendance/overtime tracking.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Time Tracking
Time Tracking
Best for
Remote, hybrid, and field-based teams and agencies
Teams wanting automatic, AI-assisted project time categorization at a low price point
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
14-day free trial, help center, priority support on Enterprise
Email, Help Center
key integrations
Jira, Slack, Asana, GitHub, Salesforce
Asana, Trello, Jira, QuickBooks
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Per-seat pricing starts affordably at under $5/month
  • Automated global payments reduce manual freelancer payouts
  • GPS tracking suits field service and distributed teams
  • SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance available for regulated teams
  • AI Agent reduces manual project-tagging effort
  • Generous free plan with unlimited users/projects
  • Affordable entry-level paid tiers starting under $4/user
  • Serves 18,000+ teams across 102 countries with strong reviews
Cons
  • Screenshot and activity monitoring may raise privacy concerns for some teams
  • Higher-tier compliance features require the Enterprise plan
  • Two-seat minimum applies on paid plans
  • Full automatic categorization accuracy depends on activity naming conventions
  • Advanced features like custom fields require the top Ultimate tier
  • Desktop app permissions (screen/activity monitoring) may concern privacy-sensitive teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Hubstaff

View all →
Buddy Punch
Buddy Punch

Employee time clock and scheduling software with GPS tracking for hourly workforce teams.

Compare
Time Doctor
Time Doctor

AI-powered time tracking and workforce analytics for distributed teams

Compare
TimeCamp
TimeCamp

AI-powered time tracking that automatically assigns tracked time to the right projects.

Compare
Desklog
Desklog

Automatic background time tracking with timesheets, productivity analytics, and project billing.

Compare

Alternatives to TimeCamp

View all →
Time Doctor
Time Doctor

AI-powered time tracking and workforce analytics for distributed teams

Compare
Timely
Timely

AI-powered automatic time tracking that builds your timesheet for you.

Compare
Desklog
Desklog

Automatic background time tracking with timesheets, productivity analytics, and project billing.

Compare
Clockify
Clockify

Free time tracker and timesheet app used by millions of teams worldwide.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Hubstaff excels for field‑service, compliance‑heavy teams needing GPS and global payroll, while TimeCamp offers a cheaper, AI‑driven solution with unlimited free users.

Key differences

  • •Hubstaff provides GPS tracking and automated global payments; TimeCamp does not.
  • •TimeCamp includes an AI agent that auto‑assigns time to projects, reducing manual tagging.
  • •Hubstaff offers SOC 2 Type II/HIPAA compliance options; TimeCamp has no listed compliance certifications.
  • •TimeCamp’s free tier supports unlimited users and projects; Hubstaff’s paid plans require a two‑seat minimum.
  • •Hubstaff integrates with Salesforce and GitHub in addition to standard project tools; TimeCamp focuses on Asana, Trello, Jira, QuickBooks.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

TimeCamp’s paid plans start under $4/user vs Hubstaff under $5/user; TimeCamp also offers unlimited free users.

TimeCamp

Ease of use / learning curve

Both are cloud SaaS with similar onboarding; no specific data to favor one.

Tie

Features & depth

Hubstaff adds GPS tracking, automated global payroll, and compliance modules absent in TimeCamp.

Hubstaff

Integrations & ecosystem

Hubstaff lists five key integrations (including Salesforce, GitHub) versus TimeCamp’s four.

Hubstaff

Scalability

TimeCamp’s free tier allows unlimited users; Hubstaff requires a two‑seat minimum on paid plans.

TimeCamp

Support & security

Hubstaff offers priority Enterprise support and SOC 2 Type II/HIPAA compliance; TimeCamp only lists email/help center.

Hubstaff

Choose Hubstaff if…

Field‑service or regulated teams needing GPS, payroll automation, and compliance.

Choose TimeCamp if…

Teams prioritizing AI auto‑tagging, low cost, and unlimited free users.

Common questions

Which tool supports GPS tracking for remote field workers?

Hubstaff includes GPS tracking; TimeCamp does not mention GPS functionality.

Is there a free plan that allows unlimited users?

TimeCamp offers a free tier with unlimited users and projects; Hubstaff’s free tier is limited and paid plans need at least two seats.

Do either of the platforms provide compliance certifications like SOC 2 or HIPAA?

Hubstaff offers SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance on its Enterprise plan; TimeCamp does not list such certifications.