Hubstaff vs TimeCamp
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Hubstaff is a time tracking and workforce management platform for distributed teams, combining multi-device time tracking with productivity monitoring, project profitability insights, and automated global payments. GPS tracking supports field teams, while optional activity rates and screenshots give visibility into remote work.
TimeCamp is a time tracking platform used by 18,000+ teams that combines automatic and manual tracking with an AI Time Tracking Agent that monitors app and website usage and intelligently assigns logged time to the correct projects. It also covers timesheet approvals, project profitability analysis, client invoicing, and attendance/overtime tracking.
- Per-seat pricing starts affordably at under $5/month
- Automated global payments reduce manual freelancer payouts
- GPS tracking suits field service and distributed teams
- SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance available for regulated teams
- AI Agent reduces manual project-tagging effort
- Generous free plan with unlimited users/projects
- Affordable entry-level paid tiers starting under $4/user
- Serves 18,000+ teams across 102 countries with strong reviews
- Screenshot and activity monitoring may raise privacy concerns for some teams
- Higher-tier compliance features require the Enterprise plan
- Two-seat minimum applies on paid plans
- Full automatic categorization accuracy depends on activity naming conventions
- Advanced features like custom fields require the top Ultimate tier
- Desktop app permissions (screen/activity monitoring) may concern privacy-sensitive teams
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Hubstaff
View all →
Employee time clock and scheduling software with GPS tracking for hourly workforce teams.
Alternatives to TimeCamp
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataHubstaff excels for field‑service, compliance‑heavy teams needing GPS and global payroll, while TimeCamp offers a cheaper, AI‑driven solution with unlimited free users.
Key differences
- •Hubstaff provides GPS tracking and automated global payments; TimeCamp does not.
- •TimeCamp includes an AI agent that auto‑assigns time to projects, reducing manual tagging.
- •Hubstaff offers SOC 2 Type II/HIPAA compliance options; TimeCamp has no listed compliance certifications.
- •TimeCamp’s free tier supports unlimited users and projects; Hubstaff’s paid plans require a two‑seat minimum.
- •Hubstaff integrates with Salesforce and GitHub in addition to standard project tools; TimeCamp focuses on Asana, Trello, Jira, QuickBooks.
Pricing & value
TimeCamp’s paid plans start under $4/user vs Hubstaff under $5/user; TimeCamp also offers unlimited free users.
Ease of use / learning curve
Both are cloud SaaS with similar onboarding; no specific data to favor one.
Features & depth
Hubstaff adds GPS tracking, automated global payroll, and compliance modules absent in TimeCamp.
Integrations & ecosystem
Hubstaff lists five key integrations (including Salesforce, GitHub) versus TimeCamp’s four.
Scalability
TimeCamp’s free tier allows unlimited users; Hubstaff requires a two‑seat minimum on paid plans.
Support & security
Hubstaff offers priority Enterprise support and SOC 2 Type II/HIPAA compliance; TimeCamp only lists email/help center.
Choose Hubstaff if…
Field‑service or regulated teams needing GPS, payroll automation, and compliance.
Choose TimeCamp if…
Teams prioritizing AI auto‑tagging, low cost, and unlimited free users.
Common questions
Which tool supports GPS tracking for remote field workers?
Hubstaff includes GPS tracking; TimeCamp does not mention GPS functionality.
Is there a free plan that allows unlimited users?
TimeCamp offers a free tier with unlimited users and projects; Hubstaff’s free tier is limited and paid plans need at least two seats.
Do either of the platforms provide compliance certifications like SOC 2 or HIPAA?
Hubstaff offers SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance on its Enterprise plan; TimeCamp does not list such certifications.

