FindAlternative
Back to Cyberduck

Cyberduck vs FileZilla

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cyberduck
CyberduckLibre file transfer client for cloud and server storage
Visit
FileZilla
FileZillaThe free and reliable cross-platform FTP, SFTP, and FTPS solution.
Visit
Overview
Description

Cyberduck is an open‑source file transfer client that lets you browse and manage files on FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and a wide range of cloud services. It offers a simple graphical interface for uploading, downloading, and synchronizing data across servers and cloud storage. Available for macOS and Windows, Cyberduck supports bookmarks, transfer queues, and encryption, making it a reliable tool for developers, system administrators, and power users who need a versatile, cross‑platform solution.

FileZilla is a widely-used, open-source file transfer solution consisting of both a feature-rich client and a robust server. It enables users to securely and efficiently transfer files between their local computer and remote servers over the internet. Designed for speed and ease of use, FileZilla supports resume and transfer of large files, site management with a comprehensive manager, and network configuration wizards to simplify complex FTP setups.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
File Managers
P2P File Sharing
Best for
Developers and system administrators
Web developers, system admins, and IT professionals
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Community Forum
Community forums, documentation
key integrations
Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Microsoft Azure
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • Supports a wide range of protocols
  • Simple, intuitive UI
  • Cross‑platform for macOS and Windows
  • Completely free and open-source software with no hidden costs
  • Supports multiple secure protocols including SFTP and FTPS
  • Intuitive and user-friendly interface with tabbed browsing
  • Cross-platform compatibility across Windows, Mac, and Linux
Cons
  • No native Linux package (requires manual install)
  • Limited automation compared to command‑line tools
  • No built‑in file versioning
  • Bundled promotional software in the official installer requires careful unchecking
  • Lacks advanced text editing capabilities compared to dedicated IDE plugins
  • User interface can feel dated compared to modern cloud-sync apps
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cyberduck

View all →
croc
croc

Secure, fast file transfers from the command line

Compare
WinSCP
WinSCP

Free SFTP, FTP, and SCP client for Windows.

Compare
Transmit
Transmit

A fast, dual-pane Mac file transfer app for FTP, SFTP, and every major cloud storage service.

Compare
Duplicati
Duplicati

Free backup software to store encrypted backups online

Compare

Alternatives to FileZilla

View all →
WinSCP
WinSCP

Free SFTP, FTP, and SCP client for Windows.

Compare
Cyberduck
Cyberduck

Libre file transfer client for cloud and server storage

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both clients are free, but FileZilla is the safer default for pure FTP/SFTP work and Linux users, while Cyberduck adds broader cloud protocol support at the cost of no native Linux package.

Key differences

  • •FileZilla runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux; Cyberduck only provides native installers for Windows and macOS.
  • •Cyberduck supports many cloud storage protocols (Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Azure, WebDAV) that FileZilla does not.
  • •Cyberduck includes client‑side encryption and bandwidth throttling; FileZilla lacks these advanced transfer controls.
  • •FileZilla’s installer bundles promotional software that must be unchecked; Cyberduck’s installer is clean.
  • •Cyberduck offers email support in addition to community forums; FileZilla relies solely on community forums.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open‑source with no hidden costs.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Both have intuitive GUIs; FileZilla’s UI feels dated, Cyberduck’s UI is described as simple.

Tie

Features & depth

Cyberduck adds client‑side encryption, bandwidth throttling, and pause/resume; FileZilla lacks these.

Cyberduck

Integrations & ecosystem

Cyberduck lists integrations with S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Azure; FileZilla lists none.

Cyberduck

Support

Cyberduck provides email support plus community forum; FileZilla only community forums.

Cyberduck

Security & privacy

Both support SFTP/FTPS; Cyberduck additionally offers client‑side encryption for transfers.

Cyberduck

Platform coverage

FileZilla runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux; Cyberduck lacks a native Linux package.

FileZilla

Choose Cyberduck if…

Developers/admins who need cloud storage protocols, encryption, and Windows/macOS support.

Choose FileZilla if…

IT pros needing reliable FTP/SFTP on Linux, Windows, or macOS without cloud storage.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either client?

Both FileZilla and Cyberduck are free and open‑source.

Can I run the client on Linux?

FileZilla offers native Linux binaries; Cyberduck does not have a native Linux package.

Do they support cloud storage services like Amazon S3?

Cyberduck supports Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Azure, etc.; FileZilla supports only FTP, FTPS, and SFTP.