FindAlternative
Back to croc

croc vs Cyberduck

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
croc
crocSecure, fast file transfers from the command line
Visit
Cyberduck
CyberduckLibre file transfer client for cloud and server storage
Visit
Overview
Description

croc is an open-source command-line tool that lets you quickly and safely transfer files and folders between devices without needing a central server. It uses end‑to‑end encryption and works across Windows, macOS, Linux, and the web, making it ideal for developers and power users who need a reliable way to share data. The tool is self‑hosted, free to use, and integrates with existing workflows via simple commands and scripts. With minimal configuration, croc handles large files, streams data in real time, and provides clear progress feedback, all while keeping your transfers private.

Cyberduck is an open‑source file transfer client that lets you browse and manage files on FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and a wide range of cloud services. It offers a simple graphical interface for uploading, downloading, and synchronizing data across servers and cloud storage. Available for macOS and Windows, Cyberduck supports bookmarks, transfer queues, and encryption, making it a reliable tool for developers, system administrators, and power users who need a versatile, cross‑platform solution.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Large File Transfer
File Managers
Best for
Developers and power users
Developers and system administrators
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Desktop App
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
38,172
—
api available
No
No
support options
Email, GitHub Issues
Email, Community Forum
primary language
Go
—
key integrations
—
Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Microsoft Azure
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • End‑to‑end encryption by default
  • Works on all major OSes
  • Simple single‑command usage
  • Free and open‑source
  • Supports a wide range of protocols
  • Simple, intuitive UI
  • Cross‑platform for macOS and Windows
Cons
  • Requires both parties to have croc installed
  • Relay server may add latency if self‑hosted
  • Limited GUI; primarily command‑line based
  • No native Linux package (requires manual install)
  • Limited automation compared to command‑line tools
  • No built‑in file versioning
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to croc

View all →
copyparty
copyparty

Self‑hosted, peer‑to‑peer file sharing for developers and power users

Compare
rclone
rclone

Sync and manage files across cloud storage from the command line

Compare
LocalSend
LocalSend

Fast, secure file sharing across your local network

Compare
Signiant
Signiant

Fast, secure file transfer software for large media assets.

Compare

Alternatives to Cyberduck

View all →
croc
croc

Secure, fast file transfers from the command line

Compare
WinSCP
WinSCP

Free SFTP, FTP, and SCP client for Windows.

Compare
Transmit
Transmit

A fast, dual-pane Mac file transfer app for FTP, SFTP, and every major cloud storage service.

Compare
Duplicati
Duplicati

Free backup software to store encrypted backups online

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

croc is a free, command‑line tool with built‑in AES‑256 encryption, ideal for developers needing scriptable, secure transfers; Cyberduck offers a graphical UI and broader protocol support but lacks Linux packaging and command‑line automation.

Key differences

  • •croc uses only command‑line interface; Cyberduck provides a native GUI for macOS/Windows.
  • •croc encrypts all traffic with AES‑256 by default; Cyberduck offers optional client‑side encryption.
  • •Cyberduck supports many protocols (FTP, FTPS, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, etc.); croc transfers via its own relay only.
  • •croc can be self‑hosted for private relays; Cyberduck is a desktop app with no self‑hosting option.
  • •Automation: croc integrates easily into scripts/CI pipelines; Cyberduck has limited automation capabilities.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free, but croc’s self‑hosted mode adds no extra cost, while Cyberduck may require manual Linux setup.

croc

Ease of use / learning curve

Cyberduck’s graphical UI with drag‑and‑drop is easier for non‑technical users than croc’s command line.

Cyberduck

Features & depth

Cyberduck supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, FTPS, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, etc.) whereas croc uses only its own relay.

Cyberduck

Integrations & ecosystem

Cyberduck lists key integrations (Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Azure); croc has no listed integrations or API.

Cyberduck

Collaboration

croc’s self‑hosted relay lets organizations control the transfer path, useful for internal collaboration.

croc

Scalability

Self‑hosted relay can be scaled within an organization; Cyberduck is limited to individual desktop instances.

croc

Security & privacy

croc encrypts all data with AES‑256 by default and offers optional password protection; Cyberduck’s encryption is optional.

croc

Choose croc if…

Developers or power users needing scriptable, end‑to‑end encrypted transfers.

Choose Cyberduck if…

Users who prefer a GUI and need multiple protocol support on macOS/Windows.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either tool?

Both are free and open‑source; no licensing fees are mentioned.

Can I run the transfer service on my own infrastructure?

croc can be self‑hosted; Cyberduck is a desktop client only, no self‑hosting option.

Which tool supports more file‑transfer protocols?

Cyberduck supports FTP, FTPS, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, Azure, etc.; croc uses its own relay protocol only.