Cyberduck vs Duplicati
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cyberduck is an open‑source file transfer client that lets you browse and manage files on FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and a wide range of cloud services. It offers a simple graphical interface for uploading, downloading, and synchronizing data across servers and cloud storage. Available for macOS and Windows, Cyberduck supports bookmarks, transfer queues, and encryption, making it a reliable tool for developers, system administrators, and power users who need a versatile, cross‑platform solution.
Duplicati is a free, open-source backup client that securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with standard protocols like FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
- Free and open‑source
- Supports a wide range of protocols
- Simple, intuitive UI
- Cross‑platform for macOS and Windows
- Free and open-source
- Supports a wide range of cloud storage services and remote file servers
- Encrypts backups to ensure data security and confidentiality
- Compresses backups to reduce storage space requirements
- No native Linux package (requires manual install)
- Limited automation compared to command‑line tools
- No built‑in file versioning
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Limited user interface and user experience
- May require technical expertise for configuration and troubleshooting
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Cyberduck
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataDuplicati is a dedicated backup tool with strong encryption, compression, and automation, while Cyberduck is a general‑purpose file‑transfer client with a simpler UI but no backup‑specific features.
Key differences
- •Duplicati performs incremental, encrypted backups with compression; Cyberduck only transfers files without backup logic.
- •Duplicati offers command‑line automation and scheduling; Cyberduck relies on a graphical UI and lacks built‑in scheduling.
- •Cyberduck provides a native drag‑and‑drop UI for macOS/Windows; Duplicati’s UI is limited and has a steeper learning curve.
- •Duplicati integrates directly with many cloud storage services for backup storage; Cyberduck focuses on file‑transfer protocols and bookmarking.
- •Support: Duplicati only community docs; Cyberduck adds email support and a community forum.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Cyberduck has a simple graphical UI; Duplicati’s limited UI and steep learning curve require more expertise.
Features & depth
Duplicati provides encryption, compression, incremental backups, scheduling, and retention policies; Cyberduck lacks backup‑specific features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Duplicati lists integrations with OneDrive, S3, Google Drive, Box, Mega, hubiC; Cyberduck lists fewer cloud services and focuses on transfer protocols.
Support
Cyberduck offers email support and a community forum; Duplicati only provides community support and documentation.
Security & privacy
Duplicati encrypts backups at rest; Cyberduck only offers client‑side encryption for transfers, not for stored backups.
Choose Cyberduck if…
Users who want a simple drag‑and‑drop client for occasional file transfers.
Choose Duplicati if…
IT admins needing automated, encrypted backups across many cloud targets.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Duplicati and Cyberduck are free and open‑source.
Can I schedule automatic backups?
Yes with Duplicati (supports schedules and retention); Cyberduck has no built‑in scheduling.
Which tool offers stronger built‑in encryption?
Duplicati encrypts backup data at rest; Cyberduck only encrypts transfers, not stored files.