FindAlternative
Back to cloudreve

cloudreve vs Zerobyte

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreveSelf‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams
Visit
Zerobyte
ZerobyteAutomated backup solution for self-hosters
Visit
Overview
Description

Cloudreve is an open‑source, self‑hosted file management platform that lets you create your own private cloud. It provides a web interface for uploading, organizing, and sharing files securely without relying on third‑party services. Designed for individuals and small teams, Cloudreve supports multiple storage back‑ends, user authentication, and fine‑grained permission controls, making it a flexible alternative to commercial cloud providers.

zerobyte is a backup automation tool designed for self-hosters, built on top of restic. It simplifies the process of backing up data, ensuring that important files and information are safely stored and easily recoverable in case of data loss or system failure. With zerobyte, users can automate their backup processes, reducing the risk of data loss and minimizing downtime.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Cloud Storage
Cloud Backup
Best for
Individuals and small teams
Self-hosters and system administrators
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
28,422+321%
6,750
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
GitHub Issues, Community Forum
Discord, GitHub Issues
primary language
Go
TypeScript
key integrations
—
Restic, AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • Self‑hosted gives full data control
  • Supports many storage back‑ends
  • Rich permission and sharing options
  • Easy to use and configure
  • Highly customizable backup schedules and retention policies
  • Supports various cloud storage services
  • Open source and free to use
Cons
  • Requires own server or VPS to run
  • Limited official documentation compared to commercial products
  • No built‑in mobile apps, only web access
  • Limited support for certain storage services
  • May require technical expertise for advanced configuration
  • Limited user interface and user experience
  • Dependent on restic for backup functionality
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to cloudreve

View all →
filebrowser
filebrowser

Self‑hosted web file manager for individuals and small teams

Compare
CasaOS
CasaOS

Simple home server OS built on Docker

Compare
Zerobyte
Zerobyte

Automated backup solution for self-hosters

Compare
Firecracker
Firecracker

Secure and fast microVMs for serverless computing

Compare

Alternatives to Zerobyte

View all →
restic
restic

Fast, secure, efficient backup program

Compare
GoodSync
GoodSync

Secure and reliable file synchronization and backup software for all devices.

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreve

Self‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams

Compare
SyncBack
SyncBack

Reliable backup, synchronization, and restoration software for Windows.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Cloudreve is a free, self‑hosted file sharing platform with rich UI and permission features, while Zerobyte is a free, self‑hosted backup automation tool focused on data protection; choose Cloudreve for collaborative file access, Zerobyte for scheduled backups.

Key differences

  • •Primary purpose: Cloudreve manages and shares files; Zerobyte automates backups and restores.
  • •User interface: Cloudreve offers a responsive web dashboard; Zerobyte has a limited UI and relies on scripts/CLI.
  • •Storage back‑ends: Cloudreve supports local disk, S3‑compatible, FTP; Zerobyte backs up to cloud services via Restic.
  • •Data protection: Zerobyte includes built‑in encryption and retention policies; Cloudreve does not encrypt data at rest.
  • •Support channels: Cloudreve uses GitHub Issues and a community forum; Zerobyte adds Discord support.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Cloudreve provides a drag‑and‑drop web UI, making file management intuitive for non‑technical users.

cloudreve

Features & depth

Cloudreve includes per‑user/folder permissions, shareable links, thumbnails, and WebDAV; Zerobyte focuses solely on backup automation.

cloudreve

Integrations & ecosystem

Zerobyte integrates directly with Restic, AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage for backup; Cloudreve relies on generic storage back‑ends.

Zerobyte

Collaboration

Cloudreve enables sharing, password‑protected links, and folder permissions, supporting team collaboration.

cloudreve

Scalability

Both are self‑hosted and scale with the underlying infrastructure you provide.

Tie

Support

Zerobyte offers Discord plus GitHub Issues, giving a real‑time community channel; Cloudreve only has GitHub Issues and a forum.

Zerobyte

Security & privacy

Zerobyte provides built‑in encryption for backups; Cloudreve does not specify encryption, only password‑protected links.

Zerobyte

Choose cloudreve if…

Teams needing shared file access, previews, and permission control on self‑hosted storage.

Choose Zerobyte if…

Admins needing automated, encrypted backups with custom schedules and retention.

Common questions

Can I use Cloudreve to back up my data automatically?

Not specified; Cloudreve focuses on file sharing, not automated backup scheduling.

Does Zerobyte provide a web UI for managing backups?

No; Zerobyte has a limited UI and relies on scripts/CLI for configuration and monitoring.

Which tool offers built‑in encryption for stored data?

Zerobyte includes data encryption for backups; Cloudreve does not specify encryption.