FindAlternative
Back to UrBackup

UrBackup vs Zerobyte

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
UrBackup
UrBackupOpen-source client-server backup software with image and file-level restores
Zerobyte
ZerobyteAutomated backup solution for self-hosters
Overview
Description

UrBackup is a free, open-source backup solution that combines full disk image backups with file-level backups, run from a central server across a network of client machines. Backups happen while systems remain in active use, and continuous folder monitoring lets it capture fast, near-real-time incremental changes rather than relying solely on scheduled full scans. Restores can be performed through a web interface, the client application, or directly from Windows Explorer, and a bootable USB image supports full bare-metal recovery. The project reports over 21,000 active server instances and is licensed under AGPLv3+, making it usable for both personal and commercial deployments without licensing fees, with cross-client deduplication to reduce storage consumption on the backup server.

zerobyte is a backup automation tool designed for self-hosters, built on top of restic. It simplifies the process of backing up data, ensuring that important files and information are safely stored and easily recoverable in case of data loss or system failure. With zerobyte, users can automate their backup processes, reducing the risk of data loss and minimizing downtime.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Backup & Sync
Cloud Backup
Best for
IT admins and self-hosters backing up networks of Windows, Mac, and Linux machines
Self-hosters and system administrators
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
No
Yes
github stars
—
6,750
support options
—
Discord, GitHub Issues
key integrations
—
Restic, AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage
primary language
—
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free and open source under AGPLv3+, including for commercial use
  • Combines image and file-level backup in one tool
  • Cross-client deduplication reduces storage costs significantly
  • Active project with over 21,000 reported server instances
  • Easy to use and configure
  • Highly customizable backup schedules and retention policies
  • Supports various cloud storage services
  • Open source and free to use
Cons
  • No official cloud-hosted version, so users must self-host and maintain the server
  • Interface and setup are more technical than most consumer backup tools
  • Official documentation and support rely heavily on community forums rather than dedicated commercial support
  • Limited support for certain storage services
  • May require technical expertise for advanced configuration
  • Limited user interface and user experience
  • Dependent on restic for backup functionality
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to UrBackup

View all →
restic
restic

Fast, secure, efficient backup program

Compare
Zerobyte
Zerobyte

Automated backup solution for self-hosters

Compare
AOMEI Backupper Professional
AOMEI Backupper Professional

Comprehensive backup, clone and sync solution for Windows PCs and servers.

Compare

Alternatives to Zerobyte

View all →
restic
restic

Fast, secure, efficient backup program

Compare
GoodSync
GoodSync

Secure and reliable file synchronization and backup software for all devices.

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreve

Self‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams

Compare
SyncBack
SyncBack

Reliable backup, synchronization, and restoration software for Windows.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

UrBackup offers comprehensive image and file‑level backup with bare‑metal restore but requires more technical setup, while Zerobyte provides a simpler, cloud‑oriented, encrypted backup built on Restic.

Key differences

  • •UrBackup includes full disk imaging and bare‑metal restore; Zerobyte does not.
  • •Zerobyte encrypts backups and natively supports cloud storage (AWS S3, Google Cloud); UrBackup lacks built‑in encryption and cloud targets.
  • •UrBackup offers a web UI for scheduling and monitoring; Zerobyte has a limited UI and relies on configuration files.
  • •Zerobyte provides an API and Discord/GitHub support; UrBackup has no API and relies on community forums.
  • •UrBackup performs cross‑client deduplication; Zerobyte’s deduplication depends on Restic’s capabilities.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost for self‑hosted deployments.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Zerobyte is described as easy to configure, whereas UrBackup’s interface and setup are more technical.

Zerobyte

Features & depth

UrBackup provides full disk imaging, bare‑metal restore, and continuous folder monitoring, which Zerobyte lacks.

UrBackup

Integrations & ecosystem

Zerobyte integrates with multiple cloud services and Restic; UrBackup has no listed cloud integrations.

Zerobyte

Support

Zerobyte offers Discord and GitHub Issues; UrBackup relies mainly on community forums with no dedicated support channel.

Zerobyte

Security & privacy

Zerobyte provides data encryption; UrBackup’s encryption is not specified.

Zerobyte

Scalability

UrBackup’s cross‑client deduplication reduces storage as client count grows; Zerobyte’s scalability depends on external cloud storage.

UrBackup

Choose UrBackup if…

IT admins needing image backups, bare‑metal restore, and deduplication for on‑prem servers.

Choose Zerobyte if…

Self‑hosters wanting simple, encrypted cloud backups with Restic and easy scheduling.

Common questions

Can I back up to cloud storage with UrBackup?

Not specified; UrBackup does not list built‑in cloud integrations.

Does Zerobyte support full system (image) backups?

No; Zerobyte focuses on file‑level backups via Restic and does not provide disk imaging.

Which tool offers encryption for backup data?

Zerobyte includes data encryption; UrBackup’s encryption capabilities are not specified.