cloudreve vs Teleport
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cloudreve is an open‑source, self‑hosted file management platform that lets you create your own private cloud. It provides a web interface for uploading, organizing, and sharing files securely without relying on third‑party services. Designed for individuals and small teams, Cloudreve supports multiple storage back‑ends, user authentication, and fine‑grained permission controls, making it a flexible alternative to commercial cloud providers.
Teleport is a software solution that provides secure access to infrastructure, allowing users to easily manage and protect their resources. It offers a simple and secure way to access and manage infrastructure, eliminating the need for VPNs, SSH, and other complex security measures.
Teleport Community Edition is free and open source (AGPL-3.0, with the API module under Apache 2.0). Teleport Enterprise is a paid commercial offering, available self-hosted or as Teleport Enterprise Cloud with usage-based pricing (billed on active users and protected resources) and a free trial.
- Free and open‑source
- Self‑hosted gives full data control
- Supports many storage back‑ends
- Rich permission and sharing options
- Provides secure access to servers, Kubernetes, databases, and web apps without VPNs, bastion hosts, or long-lived credentials
- Offers a simple and intuitive interface for managing access to resources
- Enforces compliance with security regulations and standards
- Supports zero-trust security model for maximum security
- Requires own server or VPS to run
- Limited official documentation compared to commercial products
- No built‑in mobile apps, only web access
- May require additional setup and configuration
- Limited customization options for access controls and permissions
- May not be suitable for very small organizations or individuals
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to cloudreve
View all →
Alternatives to Teleport
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCloudreve is a free, self‑hosted file‑sharing platform ideal for individuals or small teams, while Teleport is a security‑focused access‑control suite for enterprises; the default safe pick is Teleport for larger, security‑sensitive environments, but Cloudreve wins on cost and simplicity for small‑scale file storage.
Key differences
- •Purpose: Cloudreve manages files; Teleport secures access to servers, Kubernetes, databases, and web apps.
- •Target audience: Cloudreve for individuals/small teams; Teleport for enterprise/large teams.
- •Security model: Teleport provides zero‑trust, short‑lived certificates, MFA, and audit logs; Cloudreve offers password‑protected links only.
- •Deployment complexity: Cloudreve requires a simple web server; Teleport needs more extensive setup (identity providers, RBAC).
- •Integration scope: Teleport integrates with Kubernetes, Docker, AWS and identity providers; Cloudreve has limited integrations (storage back‑ends, REST API, WebDAV).
Pricing & value
Cloudreve is completely free and open‑source; Teleport’s enterprise features require paid licensing.
Ease of use / learning curve
Cloudreve offers a drag‑and‑drop web UI; Teleport requires configuring tunnels, RBAC, and identity providers.
Features & depth
Teleport provides zero‑trust access, MFA, session recording, and multi‑resource support; Cloudreve focuses on file storage only.
Integrations & ecosystem
Teleport lists native integrations with Kubernetes, Docker, AWS and identity providers; Cloudreve lists only storage back‑ends.
Collaboration
Cloudreve includes per‑user/folder permissions and shareable links; Teleport is not a collaboration tool.
Scalability
Teleport is built for large teams and enterprise infrastructure; Cloudreve is aimed at individuals/small teams.
Support
Teleport offers Slack, community forum, and documentation; Cloudreve relies mainly on GitHub Issues and a forum.
Security & privacy
Teleport provides MFA, short‑lived certificates, audit logs, and zero‑trust; Cloudreve only offers password‑protected links.
Migration / lock‑in
Cloudreve stores data on user‑chosen back‑ends (local disk, S3, FTP); Teleport ties to its own access control layer.
Choose cloudreve if…
Individuals or small teams needing free, self‑hosted file sharing with simple web UI.
Choose Teleport if…
Enterprises or large teams requiring secure, zero‑trust access to servers, containers, and databases.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either product?
Cloudreve is completely free; Teleport Community Edition is free, but Enterprise features require paid licensing.
Can Cloudreve replace a VPN for remote server access?
No; Cloudreve only manages file storage, while Teleport provides secure remote access without VPNs.
What storage options does Cloudreve support?
It supports local disk, S3‑compatible services, and FTP as back‑ends, plus a RESTful API and WebDAV.