FindAlternative
Back to cloudreve

cloudreve vs ShareFile

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreveSelf‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams
ShareFile
ShareFileSecure file sharing and document collaboration platform for business.
Overview
Description

Cloudreve is an open‑source, self‑hosted file management platform that lets you create your own private cloud. It provides a web interface for uploading, organizing, and sharing files securely without relying on third‑party services. Designed for individuals and small teams, Cloudreve supports multiple storage back‑ends, user authentication, and fine‑grained permission controls, making it a flexible alternative to commercial cloud providers.

ShareFile is a comprehensive content collaboration and file-sharing solution designed to meet the rigorous security and compliance needs of modern enterprises. It allows users to safely exchange confidential documents, collect electronic signatures, and streamline client feedback workflows. The platform combines robust encryption protocols with granular access controls, ensuring that sensitive information remains protected across desktop, mobile, and web interfaces. Businesses use ShareFile to replace insecure file transfer methods and improve productivity during client onboarding and document review cycles.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Cloud Storage
Team File Sharing
Best for
Individuals and small teams
Enterprises and regulated professionals
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
28,422
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
GitHub Issues, Community Forum
24/7 Phone, Email, and Chat Support
primary language
Go
key integrations
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Outlook
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • Self‑hosted gives full data control
  • Supports many storage back‑ends
  • Rich permission and sharing options
  • High-level security and HIPAA compliance features
  • Customizable branding for client-facing portals
  • Reliable handling of extremely large files
  • Robust mobile and desktop application ecosystem
Cons
  • Requires own server or VPS to run
  • Limited official documentation compared to commercial products
  • No built‑in mobile apps, only web access
  • Interface can feel complex for occasional users
  • Pricing is relatively high compared to basic consumer storage
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced administrative controls
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to cloudreve

View all →
filebrowser
filebrowser

Self‑hosted web file manager for individuals and small teams

Compare
CasaOS
CasaOS

Simple home server OS built on Docker

Compare
Zerobyte
Zerobyte

Automated backup solution for self-hosters

Compare
Firecracker
Firecracker

Secure and fast microVMs for serverless computing

Compare

Alternatives to ShareFile

View all →
SugarSync
SugarSync

Secure cloud file sharing, folder syncing, and online backup for any device.

Compare
Box
Box

Cloud content management for the enterprise.

Compare
OnlyOffice
OnlyOffice

Secure online office suite fully compatible with MS Office formats

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreve

Self‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams

Compare