FindAlternative
Back to Cap

Cap vs Kap

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cap
CapBeautiful, shareable screen recordings
Kap
KapOpen-source Mac screen recorder that exports directly to GIF, MP4, WebM, and APNG.
Overview
Description

Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom, allowing users to create beautiful and shareable screen recordings. It provides a simple and intuitive way to record and share knowledge, ideas, and feedback.

Kap is an open-source screen recorder for macOS, built with web technology, that captures the screen and exports directly to GIF, MP4, WebM, or APNG with optional audio in one workflow. Built-in editing covers trimming recordings and highlighting mouse clicks, useful for tutorial-style captures, and its source code is publicly available on GitHub for inspection or contribution. A plugin system extends Kap with integrations such as Giphy uploads, Vercel deployment, and Streamable hosting, and the vendor lists engineering-heavy companies including Vercel, GitHub, and CircleCI among its users. It is completely free with no paid tier, aimed at developers and designers who want a fast, minimal way to record and share short screen captures, particularly as GIFs.

Pricing
Freemium

Free for personal use (Studio Mode, 4K/60fps export, 5-minute shareable links). Paid: Desktop License $29/year (single-user commercial licence, unlimited local recording), Cap Pro $12/user/month (unlimited cloud storage & bandwidth, AI titles/summaries/transcription, team workspaces), and Enterprise with custom pricing (SAML SSO, SLAs, managed self-hosting).

Free
Category
Screen Recorders
Screen Recorders
Best for
Remote teams and individuals
Developers and designers on Mac who need quick, free screen recordings and GIFs
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
20,379
—
api available
No
No
support options
Discord, GitHub Issues
—
primary language
TypeScript
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Open-source with a free tier
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • High-quality video and audio recordings
  • Customizable recording settings
  • Completely free and open-source, with no paid tier or feature paywall.
  • Direct GIF export is convenient for quick bug reports or tutorial snippets shared in chat or docs.
  • Plugin ecosystem lets users extend functionality, like one-click Giphy or Streamable upload, without leaving the app.
  • Lightweight and fast to launch compared to heavier professional screen recording suites.
Cons
  • Editing is aimed at screen recordings rather than general-purpose video production
  • Desktop apps are available for macOS and Windows only — there is no native Linux client
  • Team workspaces, custom domains and analytics are tied to Cap's cloud or to a self-hosted instance you run yourself
  • macOS only, so Windows and Linux users cannot use it.
  • Lacks advanced editing features such as annotations, transitions, or callouts found in paid tools.
  • No built-in cloud hosting or sharing link generation beyond what plugins provide.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cap

View all →
Focalboard
Focalboard

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
OBS Studio
OBS Studio

Free and open source software for video recording and live streaming

Compare
Docmost
Docmost

Open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software

Compare

Alternatives to Kap

View all →
Cap
Cap

Beautiful, shareable screen recordings

Compare
SnapX
SnapX

Capture and share your screen instantly

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
ScreenRec
ScreenRec

Free screen recorder and screenshot tool with instant shareable links and voice dictation

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Kap is a free, open‑source Mac‑only screen recorder focused on quick GIF/short video exports, while Cap offers a cross‑platform freemium suite with cloud sharing, higher‑quality video, and collaboration features.

Key differences

  • •Platform support: Kap runs only on macOS; Cap runs on macOS and Windows.
  • •Export quality & length: Cap provides 4K/60 fps and up to 5‑minute shareable links; Kap exports to GIF, MP4, WebM, APNG with no mention of 4K.
  • •Collaboration & sharing: Cap includes share links, passwords, analytics, comments, and cloud/S3 storage; Kap relies on plugins for any sharing.
  • •Pricing model: Kap is completely free and open‑source; Cap has a freemium tier with paid desktop license for additional features.
  • •Extensibility: Kap has a plugin system for uploads (e.g., Giphy); Cap’s ecosystem is limited to its built‑in cloud and self‑hosted options.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Kap is fully free with no paid tiers; Cap offers a free tier but charges for desktop licenses and advanced features.

Kap

Ease of use / learning curve

Cap provides an intuitive UI with instant mode uploads and built‑in editor, whereas Kap is minimal and may require plugins for sharing.

Cap

Features & depth

Cap includes high‑resolution recording, audio, camera capture, AI‑generated titles, and analytics; Kap focuses on basic screen capture and GIF export.

Cap

Integrations & ecosystem

Kap’s plugin system lets users add Giphy, Streamable, Vercel, etc.; Cap has limited integrations and no plugin architecture.

Kap

Collaboration

Cap offers shareable links, password protection, comments, reactions, and team workspaces; Kap lacks built‑in collaboration tools.

Cap

Scalability / deployment

Cap can store recordings in its cloud or user‑provided S3 bucket, supporting larger teams; Kap is a local desktop app only.

Cap

Support

Cap lists Discord and GitHub Issues support; Kap provides no specified support channels.

Cap

Choose Cap if…

Cross‑platform teams or individuals needing high‑quality recordings, sharing, and collaboration features.

Choose Kap if…

Mac‑only developers/designers needing quick, free GIF/video snippets without collaboration.

Common questions

Can I use the tool on Windows?

Kap is macOS‑only; Cap runs on macOS and Windows.

Is there any cost for advanced features?

Kap is completely free; Cap requires a paid desktop license for features beyond the free tier.

Does either product provide built‑in cloud sharing?

Cap includes built‑in cloud storage, shareable links, and S3 integration; Kap relies on plugins for any sharing.