FindAlternative
Back to Cap

Cap vs Gyazo

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cap
CapBeautiful, shareable screen recordings
Visit
Gyazo
GyazoInstant screenshot and short screen-recording tool with automatic cloud sharing.
Visit
Overview
Description

Cap is an open-source alternative to Loom, allowing users to create beautiful and shareable screen recordings. It provides a simple and intuitive way to record and share knowledge, ideas, and feedback.

Gyazo captures screenshots and short screen recordings and instantly uploads them to the cloud, generating a shareable link within seconds. It includes OCR-based search, tagging, and collections to help users find old captures quickly, plus apps and browser extensions across desktop, mobile, and web.

Pricing
Freemium

Free for personal use (Studio Mode, 4K/60fps export, 5-minute shareable links). Paid: Desktop License $29/year (single-user commercial licence, unlimited local recording), Cap Pro $12/user/month (unlimited cloud storage & bandwidth, AI titles/summaries/transcription, team workspaces), and Enterprise with custom pricing (SAML SSO, SLAs, managed self-hosting).

Freemium
Category
Screen Recorders
Screen Capture
Best for
Remote teams and individuals
Individuals and teams who need fast, searchable screenshot and short screen-recording sharing
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
No
github stars
20,379
—
api available
No
No
support options
Discord, GitHub Issues
Gyazo Help Center
primary language
TypeScript
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Open-source with a free tier
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • High-quality video and audio recordings
  • Customizable recording settings
  • Extremely fast capture-to-shareable-link workflow
  • OCR search makes old screenshots genuinely findable later
  • Available across nearly every platform: desktop, mobile, and browser
  • Large established user base (23 million+ users) suggests reliability
Cons
  • Editing is aimed at screen recordings rather than general-purpose video production
  • Desktop apps are available for macOS and Windows only — there is no native Linux client
  • Team workspaces, custom domains and analytics are tied to Cap's cloud or to a self-hosted instance you run yourself
  • Free tier lacks OCR search and longer video capture
  • Captures are cloud-hosted by default, a consideration for sensitive content
  • Teams plan requires a 5-user minimum even for very small teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cap

View all →
Focalboard
Focalboard

Open-source, self-hosted alternative to Trello, Asana, and Notion

Compare
Screenity
Screenity

Free and private screen recorder

Compare
OBS Studio
OBS Studio

Free and open source software for video recording and live streaming

Compare
Docmost
Docmost

Open-source collaborative wiki and documentation software

Compare

Alternatives to Gyazo

View all →
Screenleap
Screenleap

Instant, install-free screen sharing for sales demos, support calls, and online training.

Compare
ScreenRec
ScreenRec

Free screen recorder and screenshot tool with instant shareable links and voice dictation

Compare
ShareX
ShareX

Capture, upload, and share your screen with ease

Compare
Cap
Cap

Beautiful, shareable screen recordings

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Cap offers open‑source, high‑quality screen recording with local editing and optional self‑hosted storage, while Gyazo excels at ultra‑fast screenshot/video capture with OCR search but relies on cloud storage.

Key differences

  • •Cap is open‑source with a free tier and self‑hostable storage; Gyazo is closed‑source and stores everything in Google Cloud.
  • •Cap provides built‑in video editing, AI titles, chapters and team workspaces; Gyazo focuses on instant capture and OCR‑search without editing tools.
  • •Gyazo supports many platforms (Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, browser extensions); Cap only offers desktop apps for macOS and Windows.
  • •Gyazo’s free tier lacks OCR and longer video capture; Cap’s free tier includes 4K/60fps recording and 5‑minute shareable links.
  • •Support channels differ: Cap uses Discord and GitHub Issues; Gyazo provides a Help Center only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Cap offers a free tier with 4K/60fps and self‑hosted storage; Gyazo’s free tier lacks OCR and longer video capture.

Cap

Ease of use / learning curve

Gyazo’s hotkey capture-to‑link workflow is extremely fast and requires minimal setup.

Gyazo

Features & depth

Cap includes local editing, AI‑generated titles/chapters, team workspaces, and flexible storage options.

Cap

Integrations & ecosystem

Gyazo provides apps for mobile, desktop, and browser extensions; Cap is limited to macOS/Windows desktop.

Gyazo

Collaboration

Cap offers team workspaces, comments, reactions, analytics, and custom domains; Gyazo has basic sharing permissions only.

Cap

Scalability

Gyazo’s cloud infrastructure handles unlimited storage automatically; Cap requires self‑hosting or cloud bucket management for large scale.

Gyazo

Support

Cap provides community support via Discord and GitHub Issues; Gyazo only offers a Help Center.

Cap

Choose Cap if…

Teams needing editable, high‑quality recordings with self‑hosted storage and open‑source flexibility.

Choose Gyazo if…

Individuals or small groups prioritizing instant capture, OCR search, and multi‑platform availability.

Common questions

Can I store recordings on my own server with Cap?

Yes, Cap allows storage in your own S3‑compatible bucket, locally, or fully self‑hosted.

Does Gyazo offer OCR search on the free plan?

No, OCR search is only available on Gyazo’s paid (Pro) tier.

Is there a Linux client for either tool?

Cap does not have a native Linux client; Gyazo also does not list a Linux desktop app.