FindAlternative
Back to Sourcetree

Sourcetree vs Tower

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Sourcetree
SourcetreeA free Git and Mercurial client that gives developers a visual way to manage repositories, branches, and commits.
Visit
Tower
TowerThe powerful Git client for Mac and Windows
Visit
Overview
Description

Sourcetree is a free desktop Git client for Mac and Windows from Atlassian, built to simplify Git and Mercurial version control through a visual interface instead of the command line. It visualizes branches and commits, lets developers stage or discard changes by file, hunk, or line, and includes a remote repository manager for finding and cloning repos. Beyond core commit workflows, Sourcetree supports Git-flow branching, Git Large File Storage (LFS), submodule management, and an interactive rebase tool for cleaning up commit history. It integrates with Bitbucket for account-based repository access and ships in actively updated Mac (4.2.19) and Windows (3.4.31) builds, backed by Atlassian documentation and support.

Tower is a graphical Git client for macOS and Windows designed to make version control workflows faster and less error-prone for both developers and designers. It provides visual tools for staging, branching, rebasing, and resolving conflicts on top of standard Git.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Version Control
Version Control
Best for
Developers and teams who want a visual Git/Mercurial client instead of the command line
Developers and designers who want a polished visual interface for Git
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
No
No
api available
No
No
support options
Documentation and Atlassian support/blog
—
key integrations
Bitbucket
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Git LFS
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free with no paid tier
  • Handles both Git and Mercurial repos
  • Visual branching makes complex history easier to follow
  • Actively maintained by Atlassian with regular version updates
  • Polished, approachable interface that lowers the barrier to advanced Git operations
  • Visual conflict resolution reduces mistakes during merges and rebases
  • Free for students, educators, and educational institutions
  • 30-day money-back guarantee and free trial on the Pro tier
Cons
  • No official Linux build
  • Some advanced Git operations still require dropping to command line
  • Interface can feel dense for complete beginners to Git
  • Subscription pricing when the core functionality is available free via the Git CLI or other clients
  • Mac and Windows only, no native Linux support
  • Team management features require the higher-priced Pro or Enterprise tiers
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Sourcetree

View all →
Tower
Tower

The powerful Git client for Mac and Windows

Compare
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Sublime Merge
Sublime Merge

A fast, cross-platform Git client from the makers of Sublime Text.

Compare
GitKraken
GitKraken

Cross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph

Compare

Alternatives to Tower

View all →
Fork
Fork

A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows.

Compare
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Sourcetree
Sourcetree

A free Git and Mercurial client that gives developers a visual way to manage repositories, branches, and commits.

Compare
GitKraken
GitKraken

Cross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Tower offers a polished, subscription‑based Git client with advanced visual tools, while Sourcetree is a free, feature‑rich client that also supports Mercurial.

Key differences

  • •Tower includes AI‑generated commit messages; Sourcetree does not
  • •Tower’s free tier is limited to students/educators; Sourcetree is completely free
  • •Sourcetree supports both Git and Mercurial; Tower supports Git only
  • •Tower provides built‑in Git‑Flow automation and stacked‑branch workflow; Sourcetree offers basic Git‑Flow only
  • •Tower’s native integrations cover GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket; Sourcetree lists only Bitbucket
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Sourcetree is free; Tower requires a subscription for full features.

Sourcetree

Ease of use / learning curve

Tower’s visual Conflict Wizard and drag‑drop rebase lower the barrier for beginners.

Tower

Features & depth

Tower adds AI commit messages, stacked branches, and richer conflict resolution beyond Sourcetree.

Tower

Integrations & ecosystem

Tower integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Git LFS; Sourcetree lists only Bitbucket.

Tower

Collaboration

Tower’s Pro/Enterprise tiers include team management features; Sourcetree has no dedicated collaboration tier.

Tower

Scalability

Tower’s stacked‑branch and enterprise options support larger, multi‑team workflows.

Tower

Support

Sourcetree benefits from Atlassian documentation and support; Tower only offers a money‑back guarantee and trial.

Sourcetree

Choose Sourcetree if…

Individuals or small teams wanting a free, capable client that also handles Mercurial repositories.

Choose Tower if…

Teams needing advanced visual Git workflows, AI assistance, and enterprise‑grade collaboration tools.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either tool?

Tower requires a paid subscription for full features (free for students/educators); Sourcetree is completely free.

Can I use these clients on Linux?

Both provide no native Linux builds; they are limited to macOS and Windows.

Do both tools support Git‑Flow and large file storage?

Yes, both support Git‑Flow and Git LFS; Tower also adds AI commit messages and stacked‑branch management.