FindAlternative
Back to GitKraken

GitKraken vs Sourcetree

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
GitKraken
GitKrakenCross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph
Visit
Sourcetree
SourcetreeA free Git and Mercurial client that gives developers a visual way to manage repositories, branches, and commits.
Visit
Overview
Description

GitKraken is a Git client that helps developers manage their repositories with a visual interface. It provides a commit graph, allowing users to easily navigate and understand their code history.

Sourcetree is a free desktop Git client for Mac and Windows from Atlassian, built to simplify Git and Mercurial version control through a visual interface instead of the command line. It visualizes branches and commits, lets developers stage or discard changes by file, hunk, or line, and includes a remote repository manager for finding and cloning repos. Beyond core commit workflows, Sourcetree supports Git-flow branching, Git Large File Storage (LFS), submodule management, and an interactive rebase tool for cleaning up commit history. It integrates with Bitbucket for account-based repository access and ships in actively updated Mac (4.2.19) and Windows (3.4.31) builds, backed by Atlassian documentation and support.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Free
Category
Version Control
Version Control
Best for
Developers and development teams
Developers and teams who want a visual Git/Mercurial client instead of the command line
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
No
No
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Documentation
Documentation and Atlassian support/blog
key integrations
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • User-friendly interface for Git commands and actions.
  • Visual commit graph makes it easy to understand code history.
  • Supports multiple operating systems and popular services.
  • Offers a free trial and subscription plans for individuals and teams.
  • Completely free with no paid tier
  • Handles both Git and Mercurial repos
  • Visual branching makes complex history easier to follow
  • Actively maintained by Atlassian with regular version updates
Cons
  • May have a learning curve for users unfamiliar with Git.
  • Some features may require a subscription.
  • Not suitable for very large or complex repositories.
  • No official Linux build
  • Some advanced Git operations still require dropping to command line
  • Interface can feel dense for complete beginners to Git
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to GitKraken

View all →
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Fork
Fork

A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows.

Compare
Sourcetree
Sourcetree

A free Git and Mercurial client that gives developers a visual way to manage repositories, branches, and commits.

Compare
GitButler
GitButler

A Git client built around virtual branches for managing multiple changes at once.

Compare

Alternatives to Sourcetree

View all →
Tower
Tower

The powerful Git client for Mac and Windows

Compare
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Sublime Merge
Sublime Merge

A fast, cross-platform Git client from the makers of Sublime Text.

Compare
GitKraken
GitKraken

Cross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

GitKraken offers a polished, cross‑platform Git‑only GUI with paid plans and broader service integrations, while Sourcetree is a free, Windows/macOS‑only client that also supports Mercurial.

Key differences

  • •Pricing: GitKraken requires a subscription; Sourcetree is completely free.
  • •Platform support: GitKraken runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux; Sourcetree has no official Linux build.
  • •Repository type: GitKraken handles Git only; Sourcetree handles both Git and Mercurial.
  • •Service integrations: GitKraken lists GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket; Sourcetree lists only Bitbucket in the provided facts.
  • •Built‑in Git‑flow support: Both have it, but GitKraken’s feature list emphasizes it as a core workflow.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Sourcetree is free with no paid tier, whereas GitKraken requires a subscription for full features.

Sourcetree

Ease of use / learning curve

GitKraken markets a user‑friendly interface; Sourcetree’s dense UI can feel overwhelming for beginners.

GitKraken

Features & depth

GitKraken includes visual commit graph, Git‑flow, and multiple repo management; Sourcetree lacks some visual tools like interactive rebase.

GitKraken

Integrations & ecosystem

GitKraken integrates with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket; Sourcetree’s listed integration is only Bitbucket.

GitKraken

Collaboration

GitKraken offers team subscription plans and email support, indicating stronger collaboration tooling.

GitKraken

Scalability

GitKraken notes it is not suitable for very large or complex repositories; Sourcetree has no such limitation mentioned.

Sourcetree

Support

GitKraken provides email support; Sourcetree relies on documentation and Atlassian blog/support.

GitKraken

Choose GitKraken if…

Teams needing cross‑platform Git support, premium UI, and integration with GitHub/GitLab.

Choose Sourcetree if…

Budget‑focused users or teams that need Mercurial support and run on Windows/macOS only.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use these tools?

GitKraken requires a paid subscription (free trial available); Sourcetree is completely free.

Can I run the client on Linux?

GitKraken supports Linux; Sourcetree has no official Linux build.

Do both tools support Mercurial repositories?

Only Sourcetree supports Mercurial; GitKraken supports Git only.