FindAlternative
Back to Qovery

Qovery vs Scalingo

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Qovery
QoveryDeploy apps directly to your own cloud account with zero-config CI/CD
Scalingo
ScalingoEuropean PaaS that deploys apps from Git with managed databases and auto‑scaling.
Overview
Description

Qovery is a deployment platform that provisions infrastructure into your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, turning Git pushes into live services automatically. It abstracts Kubernetes, Docker, and CI pipelines so developers can focus on code, not ops. The service offers a free tier for small projects and paid plans for teams, providing features like auto-scaling, secret management, and zero-downtime releases while keeping full ownership of the underlying cloud resources.

Scalingo is a European platform‑as‑a‑service that lets developers push code straight from their Git repositories and have a fully managed runtime environment provisioned instantly. It handles the underlying infrastructure, networking, and security so teams can focus on building features. The platform includes managed PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB and Redis databases, automatic TLS certificates, and a marketplace of add‑ons for logging, monitoring, and email. With instant scaling of CPU, RAM, and instances, Scalingo is designed for fast‑moving startups and SaaS products that need reliability and GDPR‑compliant hosting.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Best for
Developers and DevOps teams
Developers and SaaS startups
Specifications
free tier
Yes
Yes
uptime sla
99.9%
99.95%
datacenter regions
US, EU, APAC (via AWS, GCP, Azure)
EU (France, Germany)
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Zero-config deployment to your own cloud account.
  • Built-in CI/CD eliminates separate pipeline tools.
  • Supports AWS, GCP, and Azure with multi-cloud flexibility.
  • Free tier sufficient for small projects and prototypes.
  • Easy Git‑based deployment
  • Managed databases reduce ops overhead
  • Automatic scaling without downtime
  • EU data residency for GDPR compliance
Cons
  • Limited to cloud providers supported by Qovery (AWS, GCP, Azure).
  • Advanced scaling policies require paid plan.
  • User interface can be overwhelming for beginners.
  • Higher cost than raw IaaS for large workloads
  • Limited to European regions
  • Less flexibility for custom low‑level server tweaks
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Qovery

View all →
Cloud 66
Cloud 66

DevOps-as-a-service platform that deploys apps to any cloud or server

Compare
Scalingo
Scalingo

European PaaS that deploys apps from Git with managed databases and auto‑scaling.

Compare
Koyeb
Koyeb

Serverless platform for global container deployment

Compare

Alternatives to Scalingo

View all →
Upsun
Upsun

Managed PaaS for per-branch preview environments

Compare
Koyeb
Koyeb

Serverless platform for global container deployment

Compare
CDN77
CDN77

Fast, flat-rate global CDN with built-in video streaming

Compare
Qovery
Qovery

Deploy apps directly to your own cloud account with zero-config CI/CD

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Scalingo offers EU‑centric, fully managed PaaS with auto‑scaling and GDPR compliance, while Qovery gives multi‑cloud Kubernetes control with built‑in CI/CD; choose Scalingo for simplicity and data‑residency, Qovery for cloud flexibility.

Key differences

  • •Data residency: Scalingo runs only in EU data centers (France, Germany); Qovery can deploy to AWS, GCP, Azure worldwide.
  • •Infrastructure control: Scalingo abstracts servers; Qovery creates a dedicated Kubernetes cluster you own.
  • •Scaling mechanism: Scalingo scales CPU/RAM/instances via console/CLI; Qovery scales pod replicas via auto‑scaling policies.
  • •CI/CD integration: Scalingo does not include CI pipelines; Qovery automatically builds Docker images on each push.
  • •Uptime SLA: Scalingo guarantees 99.95%; Qovery guarantees 99.9%.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both offer freemium tiers; no cost details beyond free tier are provided.

Tie

Uptime & reliability

Scalingo SLA 99.95% vs Qovery SLA 99.9%.

Scalingo

Performance

Qovery runs on user‑chosen cloud providers (AWS/GCP/Azure) with dedicated Kubernetes, potentially higher performance.

Qovery

Developer experience

Scalingo deploys via single git push, managed DBs, unified CLI; Qovery adds CI/CD and Kubernetes complexity.

Scalingo

Regions & compliance

Scalingo limited to EU but provides GDPR‑compliant data residency; Qovery spans US/EU/APAC but no specific compliance claim.

Scalingo

Support

Neither product’s support details are specified.

Tie

Lock‑in

Qovery ties you to a cloud provider account; Scalingo locks you to its EU PaaS platform.

Qovery

Choose Qovery if…

Teams wanting control over cloud provider, Kubernetes, and built‑in CI/CD across multiple regions.

Choose Scalingo if…

Startups needing GDPR‑compliant, hands‑off hosting with managed databases and simple git deploy.

Common questions

Can I run my app outside Europe with Scalingo?

No, Scalingo only offers EU regions (France, Germany).

Does Qovery include CI/CD pipelines?

Yes, Qovery automatically builds Docker images and runs CI pipelines on each git push.

Which service has a higher uptime guarantee?

Scalingo guarantees 99.95% uptime, higher than Qovery's 99.9% SLA.