Koyeb vs Qovery
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Koyeb is a serverless platform that enables users to deploy containers globally with autoscaling. It provides a scalable and secure way to deploy applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
Qovery is a deployment platform that provisions infrastructure into your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, turning Git pushes into live services automatically. It abstracts Kubernetes, Docker, and CI pipelines so developers can focus on code, not ops. The service offers a free tier for small projects and paid plans for teams, providing features like auto-scaling, secret management, and zero-downtime releases while keeping full ownership of the underlying cloud resources.
- Scalable and secure infrastructure
- Automated deployment and scaling
- Support for a wide range of container runtimes
- Real-time monitoring and logging
- Zero-config deployment to your own cloud account.
- Built-in CI/CD eliminates separate pipeline tools.
- Supports AWS, GCP, and Azure with multi-cloud flexibility.
- Free tier sufficient for small projects and prototypes.
- Limited control over underlying infrastructure
- Dependence on Koyeb's proprietary platform
- Potential for vendor lock-in
- Limited to cloud providers supported by Qovery (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Advanced scaling policies require paid plan.
- User interface can be overwhelming for beginners.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Koyeb
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataKoyeb offers a fully managed serverless platform with higher uptime and performance but tighter vendor lock‑in, while Qovery gives zero‑config CI/CD on your own cloud account with more control but slightly lower uptime.
Key differences
- •Infrastructure control: Koyeb runs on its proprietary platform; Qovery provisions clusters in your own AWS/GCP/Azure account.
- •Uptime SLA: Koyeb 99.99% vs Qovery 99.9%.
- •Free‑tier limits: Qovery caps at 2 GB RAM & 1 vCPU per environment; Koyeb’s free‑tier resources are not specified.
- •Built‑in CI/CD: Qovery includes automatic pipelines and Git sync; Koyeb integrates with CI/CD tools but requires setup.
- •Vendor lock‑in: Koyeb’s platform is proprietary; Qovery lets you retain ownership of the underlying cloud resources.
Pricing & value
Both offer freemium plans; Qovery’s free tier limits resources, Koyeb’s free‑tier resource limits are not specified.
Uptime & reliability
Koyeb guarantees 99.99% SLA, Qovery guarantees 99.9%.
Performance
Koyeb advertises high‑performance, low‑latency infrastructure; Qovery provides no specific performance claims.
Developer experience
Qovery offers zero‑config CI/CD, Git sync, and auto‑scaling out‑of‑the‑box, easing developer workflows.
Regions & compliance
Both list US, EU, APAC regions via major cloud providers.
Lock‑in
Koyeb runs on its own platform (higher lock‑in); Qovery uses your own cloud account, reducing lock‑in.
Choose Koyeb if…
Enterprises needing a fully managed, globally‑scaled serverless platform with the highest uptime.
Choose Qovery if…
Teams that want to keep workloads in their own cloud, need built‑in CI/CD, and prefer lower lock‑in.
Common questions
What uptime guarantee does each service provide?
Koyeb offers a 99.99% SLA; Qovery offers a 99.9% SLA.
How does vendor lock‑in differ between the two?
Koyeb runs on its proprietary platform, creating higher lock‑in; Qovery deploys to your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, reducing lock‑in.
What are the limits of the free tiers?
Qovery’s free tier allows unlimited projects but caps each environment at 2 GB RAM and 1 vCPU; Koyeb’s free tier existence is confirmed but resource limits are not specified.