FindAlternative
Back to OneLogin

OneLogin vs Ping Identity

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
OneLogin
OneLoginCloud-based single sign-on and identity management for workforce and customer apps.
Visit
Ping Identity
Ping IdentityEnterprise identity platform combining SSO, MFA, and adaptive authentication.
Visit
Overview
Description

OneLogin is a cloud identity and access management platform that gives employees one secure login to reach all their corporate applications through a unified SSO portal. It supports SAML, OIDC and other federation standards, syncs with Active Directory and LDAP directories, and layers on multi-factor authentication and adaptive risk-based policies to protect access without adding friction for end users.

Ping Identity provides an enterprise identity and access management platform covering workforce, customer, and B2B use cases. It combines single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and directory services with adaptive, risk-based authentication that adjusts login requirements based on contextual and behavioral signals.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Category
Identity & SSO
Identity & SSO
Best for
IT and security teams at mid-size to large enterprises managing workforce app access
Enterprise IT and security teams managing workforce, customer, or B2B identity
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Support Portal, Phone (Enterprise)
Email, Support Portal, Phone (Enterprise)
key integrations
Active Directory, LDAP, Google Workspace, Workday, Slack
Active Directory, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta migration tools
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Broad catalog of pre-built app integrations for fast SSO rollout
  • Mobile MFA app (Protect) is straightforward for end users
  • Strong directory synchronization with AD and common HR systems
  • Established vendor with long track record in workforce IAM
  • Strong adaptive and risk-based authentication capabilities
  • Covers workforce, customer, and B2B identity in one platform
  • Mature standards support (SAML, OIDC, OAuth, WS-Fed)
  • Enterprise-grade scalability for large user bases
Cons
  • Pricing is no longer published, requiring a sales conversation for even small teams
  • Admin console can feel dated compared to newer identity platforms
  • Advanced governance features are more limited than dedicated IGA tools like SailPoint
  • No public pricing makes budgeting difficult without a sales call
  • Platform breadth can mean longer implementation projects
  • Best suited to enterprise buyers rather than small teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to OneLogin

View all →
Ping Identity
Ping Identity

Enterprise identity platform combining SSO, MFA, and adaptive authentication.

Compare
keycloak
keycloak

Open-source identity and access management for modern applications

Compare
logto
logto

Modern authentication and authorization infrastructure for developers

Compare
Okta
Okta

Enterprise identity and access management platform

Compare

Alternatives to Ping Identity

View all →
OneLogin
OneLogin

Cloud-based single sign-on and identity management for workforce and customer apps.

Compare
Okta
Okta

Enterprise identity and access management platform

Compare
miniOrange
miniOrange

Identity and access management suite covering SSO, MFA, PAM, and identity governance.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both offer cloud SSO and MFA for enterprises, but OneLogin focuses on workforce IAM with strong directory sync, while Ping Identity adds broader adaptive, risk‑based authentication and supports customer/ B2B use cases.

Key differences

  • •OneLogin emphasizes workforce directory synchronization (AD, LDAP, Google Workspace, Workday) whereas Ping adds AI‑driven risk detection and zero‑knowledge biometric options.
  • •Ping supports separate identity experiences for workforce, customer (CIAM) and B2B, while OneLogin is primarily workforce‑focused.
  • •Ping’s adaptive authentication is described as more advanced (contextual, behavioral, AI‑driven) compared with OneLogin’s basic adaptive rules.
  • •OneLogin’s pre‑built app catalog is highlighted as broad; Ping’s key integrations list is shorter but includes migration tools for Okta.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both require contacting sales; no public pricing, so value cannot be directly compared.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

OneLogin’s admin console is noted as dated, but its MFA app is described as straightforward for end users.

OneLogin

Features & depth

Ping offers AI‑driven fraud prevention, zero‑knowledge biometrics, and broader CIAM/B2B capabilities beyond OneLogin’s workforce focus.

Ping Identity

Integrations & ecosystem

OneLogin lists a broader set of pre‑built integrations (AD, LDAP, Google Workspace, Workday, Slack) than Ping’s shorter list.

OneLogin

Scalability

Ping is described as enterprise‑grade for large user bases; OneLogin targets mid‑size to large enterprises but no explicit scalability claim.

Ping Identity

Support

Both provide email, support portal, and enterprise phone support.

Tie

Security & privacy

Ping includes AI risk detection, verifiable credentials, and zero‑knowledge biometrics, which are not mentioned for OneLogin.

Ping Identity

Choose OneLogin if…

Enterprises needing quick workforce SSO rollout with strong AD/HR sync and simple MFA.

Choose Ping Identity if…

Large organizations requiring advanced adaptive authentication, risk‑based controls, and CIAM/B2B identity.

Common questions

Is there any public pricing information to compare cost?

Both products list pricing as “Contact for Pricing,” so cost details must be obtained from sales.

Which platform supports customer‑facing (CIAM) scenarios?

Ping Identity explicitly supports separate customer (CIAM) and B2B identity experiences; OneLogin does not mention CIAM.

Do both solutions integrate with existing Active Directory?

Yes. Both list Active Directory as a key integration for directory synchronization.