FindAlternative
Back to Okta

Okta vs Ping Identity

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Okta
OktaEnterprise identity and access management platform
Visit
Ping Identity
Ping IdentityEnterprise identity platform combining SSO, MFA, and adaptive authentication.
Visit
Overview
Description

Okta is an enterprise identity and access management platform providing single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and lifecycle management for workforce and customer identities. It helps organizations to securely manage access to applications, data, and resources across multiple devices and locations.

Ping Identity provides an enterprise identity and access management platform covering workforce, customer, and B2B use cases. It combines single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and directory services with adaptive, risk-based authentication that adjusts login requirements based on contextual and behavioral signals.

Pricing
—
Contact for Pricing
Category
Identity & SSO
Identity & SSO
Best for
Enterprise and large business
Enterprise IT and security teams managing workforce, customer, or B2B identity
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Phone Support
Email, Support Portal, Phone (Enterprise)
key integrations
AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Salesforce, Microsoft 365
Active Directory, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta migration tools
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Provides a comprehensive identity and access management platform
  • Offers robust security and compliance features
  • Supports integration with various applications and services
  • Scalable and flexible to meet the needs of large enterprises
  • Strong adaptive and risk-based authentication capabilities
  • Covers workforce, customer, and B2B identity in one platform
  • Mature standards support (SAML, OIDC, OAuth, WS-Fed)
  • Enterprise-grade scalability for large user bases
Cons
  • Can be complex to implement and manage
  • May require significant customization and configuration
  • Pricing can be high for large-scale deployments
  • No public pricing makes budgeting difficult without a sales call
  • Platform breadth can mean longer implementation projects
  • Best suited to enterprise buyers rather than small teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Okta

View all →
keycloak
keycloak

Open-source identity and access management for modern applications

Compare
OneLogin
OneLogin

Cloud-based single sign-on and identity management for workforce and customer apps.

Compare
FusionAuth
FusionAuth

Developer-friendly identity and access management platform

Compare
Ping Identity
Ping Identity

Enterprise identity platform combining SSO, MFA, and adaptive authentication.

Compare

Alternatives to Ping Identity

View all →
OneLogin
OneLogin

Cloud-based single sign-on and identity management for workforce and customer apps.

Compare
Okta
Okta

Enterprise identity and access management platform

Compare
miniOrange
miniOrange

Identity and access management suite covering SSO, MFA, PAM, and identity governance.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both are enterprise‑grade identity platforms, but Ping Identity leans toward advanced adaptive risk and CIAM features, while Okta offers a broader integration ecosystem and more extensive support options.

Key differences

  • •Adaptive, AI‑driven risk and zero‑knowledge biometric authentication are explicit in Ping but not in Okta.
  • •Okta lists a wider cloud‑service integration set (Azure, Google Cloud, Microsoft 365) versus Ping’s more limited list.
  • •Support channels differ: Ping provides enterprise phone support; Okta adds 24/7 phone, live‑chat, and email.
  • •Ping emphasizes separate experiences for workforce, customer (CIAM), and B2B; Okta groups them under a single IAM suite.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both list pricing as unknown or contact‑sales only, so no direct price comparison can be made.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Neither product provides specific usability metrics; both are enterprise platforms that may require training.

Tie

Features & depth

Ping includes adaptive authentication, AI fraud prevention, verifiable credentials, and zero‑knowledge biometrics, which Okta does not mention.

Ping Identity

Integrations & ecosystem

Okta lists integrations with Azure, Google Cloud, and Microsoft 365 in addition to AWS and Salesforce, a broader set than Ping's listed integrations.

Okta

Support

Okta offers 24/7 phone support, live chat, and email; Ping offers email, portal, and enterprise phone support only.

Okta

Scalability

Both are described as enterprise‑grade and capable of handling large user bases.

Tie

Security & privacy

Ping highlights AI‑driven fraud detection, adaptive risk, and zero‑knowledge biometric options; Okta mentions compliance but no specific advanced privacy tech.

Ping Identity

Choose Okta if…

Enterprises prioritizing a wide cloud integration catalog and 24/7 support, willing to manage complexity.

Choose Ping Identity if…

Enterprises needing adaptive risk‑based auth, CIAM/B2B separation, and advanced privacy features.

Common questions

How do the two platforms differ on adaptive or risk‑based authentication?

Ping Identity explicitly offers AI‑driven adaptive authentication and step‑up risk controls; Okta does not list adaptive risk features.

Which solution provides more out‑of‑the‑box cloud service integrations?

Okta lists integrations with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Salesforce, and Microsoft 365, a broader set than Ping's listed integrations.

What support options are available for each product?

Ping provides email, support portal, and enterprise phone support; Okta adds 24/7 phone support and live‑chat in addition to email.