FindAlternative
Back to IFTTT

IFTTT vs Make

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
IFTTT
IFTTTAutomate everyday tasks by connecting your apps, devices, and services
Make
MakeAutomate any workflow without code
Overview
Description

IFTTT (If This Then That) is a no-code automation platform that lets people connect apps, smart home devices, and online services through simple trigger-and-action workflows called Applets. Users pick a trigger event from one service and an action in another, and IFTTT runs the automation automatically in the background. The platform supports over 1,000 services spanning smart home, social media, productivity, and AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, plus webhooks and filter code for more advanced logic. It is built for consumers and small businesses who want to automate repetitive tasks across their favorite apps and devices without writing any code.

Make is a cloud‑based no‑code platform that lets you connect apps, services, and devices into powerful automated workflows. Its visual editor lets users drag‑and‑drop modules, set triggers, and define actions without writing code. The platform supports thousands of integrations, real‑time execution, and advanced features like conditional logic and data mapping, making it suitable for both simple tasks and complex business processes.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Automation Tools
Low-Code / No-Code
Best for
Consumers and small businesses automating everyday app and device workflows
—
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
—
open source
No
—
api available
Yes
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Huge library of pre-built Applets covering popular apps and smart home devices
  • No coding required to set up most automations
  • Webhooks and filter code give power users more advanced control
  • Mobile apps make triggers like location and notifications easy to use
—
Cons
  • Free plan limits users to a small number of active Applets
  • Some popular services and multi-action Applets require a paid Pro or Pro+ plan
  • Automation delays can occur on the free tier compared to faster-execution paid tiers
—
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to IFTTT

View all →
Make
Make

Automate any workflow without code

Compare
Zapier
Zapier

Connect your apps and automate workflows without code

Compare
n8n
n8n

Automate workflows with a fair-code licensed tool

Compare
Pabbly Connect
Pabbly Connect

Workflow automation platform connecting 2,000+ apps with a one-time payment option.

Compare

Alternatives to Make

View all →
Zapier
Zapier

Connect your apps and automate workflows without code

Compare
IFTTT
IFTTT

Automate everyday tasks by connecting your apps, devices, and services

Compare
n8n
n8n

Automate workflows with a fair-code licensed tool

Compare
Activepieces
Activepieces

Open-source no-code automation platform for building workflows

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

IFTTT is best for simple, single‑step automations with many ready‑made applets; Make excels at complex, multi‑step workflows with deeper data handling.

Key differences

  • •IFTTT offers a huge library of pre‑built applets for quick start; Make requires you to build scenarios from scratch.
  • •Make’s visual editor supports unlimited multi‑step automations, filters, routers and iterators; IFTTT limits to single‑action applets on the free tier.
  • •Make includes built‑in analytics, logs and error handling for monitoring; IFTTT provides no such monitoring features in the facts.
  • •IFTTT integrates AI services like ChatGPT and Claude as triggers/actions; Make’s AI integration is not mentioned.
  • •Free IFTTT limits active applets; Make’s free tier claims unlimited automations, though exact limits aren’t specified.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are freemium, but Make advertises unlimited automations on the free tier, while IFTTT limits active applets.

Make

Ease of use / learning curve

IFTTT provides pre‑built applets and simple mobile widgets, requiring no design effort; Make needs users to construct scenarios.

IFTTT

Features & depth

Make offers multi‑step flows, conditional routers, iterators, data transformation, and analytics; IFTTT is limited to single‑action applets.

Make

Integrations & ecosystem

Both claim connections to over 1,000 services; no data shows one having more.

Tie

Collaboration

Neither product description mentions collaboration features.

Tie

Scalability

Make’s unlimited multi‑step scenarios and API support suggest higher scalability than IFTTT’s applet limits.

Make

Support

No support information is provided for either product.

Tie

Choose IFTTT if…

Casual users or small teams needing quick, ready‑made automations with minimal setup.

Choose Make if…

Power users or businesses that need complex, multi‑step workflows and detailed monitoring.

Common questions

Can I run multi‑step automations on the free plan?

Make advertises unlimited multi‑step automations on its free tier; IFTTT’s free plan is limited to single‑action applets.

Which tool offers better monitoring of automation runs?

Make includes built‑in analytics, logs, and error handling; IFTTT provides no monitoring features in the provided facts.

Do both platforms support custom HTTP APIs?

Make explicitly supports any HTTP API; IFTTT mentions webhooks for custom triggers but does not detail full HTTP API support.