Activepieces vs Make
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Activepieces is an open-source, no-code automation tool that lets you connect apps and create custom workflows without writing code. It provides a visual editor and a library of pre-built actions, making it easy to automate repetitive tasks. Positioned as a self‑hosted alternative to Zapier, Activepieces can run on your own infrastructure or be used via the hosted cloud service, giving you full control over data privacy and scalability.
Make is a cloud‑based no‑code platform that lets you connect apps, services, and devices into powerful automated workflows. Its visual editor lets users drag‑and‑drop modules, set triggers, and define actions without writing code. The platform supports thousands of integrations, real‑time execution, and advanced features like conditional logic and data mapping, making it suitable for both simple tasks and complex business processes.
- Fully open-source and self‑hostable
- No-code visual editor lowers entry barrier
- Extensible with custom code steps
- Free tier includes unlimited workflows
- Smaller connector library than major SaaS competitors
- Self‑hosting requires technical setup
- Limited native mobile app support
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Activepieces
View all →
Alternatives to Make
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMake offers a larger connector library and easier out‑of‑the‑box use, while Activepieces gives open‑source, self‑hosted control and team collaboration features.
Key differences
- •Connector count: Make >1,000 vs Activepieces ~200.
- •Deployment model: Make is SaaS only; Activepieces can be self‑hosted.
- •Team collaboration: Activepieces includes role‑based access control; Make has no stated collaboration features.
- •Extensibility: Both allow custom code, but Activepieces explicitly supports JavaScript/TypeScript steps.
- •Open‑source: Only Activepieces is open‑source.
Pricing & value
Both offer freemium tiers with unlimited workflows; no pricing details beyond that.
Ease of use / learning curve
Make is pure SaaS with drag‑and‑drop editor; Activepieces requires self‑hosting setup.
Features & depth
Make provides 1,000+ native apps, conditional routers, iterators, and built‑in analytics.
Integrations & ecosystem
Make supports over 1,000 apps versus Activepieces' ~200 connectors.
Collaboration
Activepieces offers role‑based access control for team sharing; Make lists no collaboration features.
Security & privacy
Activepieces can run on the buyer’s own server, giving full data control; Make is SaaS only.
Support
Activepieces provides community forum, GitHub, email; Make lists no support options.
Choose Activepieces if…
Teams that require self‑hosted, open‑source automation and granular collaboration controls.
Choose Make if…
Businesses that need many connectors and a ready‑to‑use SaaS solution with minimal setup.
Common questions
Which platform has more native integrations?
Make, with over 1,000 native apps; Activepieces offers about 200.
Can I run the automation on my own infrastructure?
Yes, Activepieces can be self‑hosted; Make is only available as a SaaS service.
Is there a free tier for unlimited workflows?
Both provide a freemium tier that includes unlimited workflows.