FindAlternative
Back to GoatCounter

GoatCounter vs Umami

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
GoatCounter
GoatCounterOpen-source, privacy-aware web analytics that's free for personal and small business sites.
Umami
UmamiSimple, easy-to-use analytics
Overview
Description

GoatCounter is an open-source web analytics platform positioned as a privacy-conscious alternative to Google Analytics and Matomo. It identifies unique visits without cookies or unique tracking identifiers and does not persistently store personal data, which the project says avoids the need for a GDPR consent notice. The tracking script adds roughly 3.5KB to a page and can be installed via a JavaScript tag, an image-based tracker, backend middleware, or log file import. The hosted service at goatcounter.com is free for reasonable use on personal sites and small-to-medium businesses, funded by GitHub Sponsors donations, while the fully open-source codebase is available for anyone who wants to self-host it for complete control over their data. It reports standard metrics like browser, location, screen size, referrers, and campaigns in a simple, no-frills dashboard.

Umami is a simple, easy-to-use analytics solution that helps you track website data without compromising user privacy. It's a self-hosted, open-source alternative to Google Analytics.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Web Analytics
Web Analytics
Best for
Website owners, developers, and open-source projects wanting simple, privacy-respecting analytics
Small businesses and individuals
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
GitHub, documentation
Community support, Documentation
key integrations
JavaScript tag, backend middleware, server log import
Next.js, Gatsby, React
github stars
—
37,721
primary language
—
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Genuinely free for reasonable personal and small business use
  • Fully open source with a self-hosting option for total data control
  • Minimal, lightweight tracking script
  • No cookie consent banner needed
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Respects user privacy
  • Customizable and flexible
  • Cost-effective
Cons
  • Dashboard and reporting are much more basic than commercial analytics tools
  • Self-hosting requires technical setup and server maintenance
  • Larger sites are expected to self-host rather than use the free hosted tier
  • Limited scalability
  • Requires technical expertise
  • Limited support for advanced analytics
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to GoatCounter

View all →
Pirsch Analytics
Pirsch Analytics

Privacy-focused, cookie-free web analytics that skips consent banners entirely.

Compare
Simple Analytics
Simple Analytics

Privacy-friendly web analytics that sees the traffic Google Analytics misses.

Compare
Umami
Umami

Simple, easy-to-use analytics

Compare
Rybbit
Rybbit

Open source, privacy-friendly web analytics with session replay

Compare

Alternatives to Umami

View all →
Google Analytics
Google Analytics

Free web and app analytics from Google.

Compare
Plausible Analytics
Plausible Analytics

Lightweight, privacy-friendly web analytics.

Compare
PostHog
PostHog

Self-hosted product analytics

Compare
Matomo
Matomo

Open-source web analytics that puts your data back in your hands

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both GoatCounter and Umami are free, open‑source, privacy‑focused analytics, but GoatCounter offers a hosted option and a lighter script, while Umami provides richer real‑time dashboards and more customization at the cost of self‑hosting complexity.

Key differences

  • •GoatCounter has a free hosted SaaS tier; Umami is only self‑hosted.
  • •Umami’s UI is more customizable with real‑time dashboards; GoatCounter’s reporting is basic.
  • •GoatCounter’s script is ~3.5 KB and cookie‑free; Umami also avoids cookies but script size isn’t specified.
  • •Umami lists many integrations (Next.js, Gatsby, React) and storage options; GoatCounter lists generic JavaScript/tag integrations only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free, but GoatCounter adds a hosted service for small sites, giving extra value without self‑hosting.

GoatCounter

Ease of use / learning curve

GoatCounter offers a hosted option and simple tag setup; Umami requires full self‑hosting and technical expertise.

GoatCounter

Features & depth

Umami provides real‑time data, custom events/goals, and customizable dashboards; GoatCounter’s reports are basic.

Umami

Integrations & ecosystem

Umami lists specific framework integrations (Next.js, Gatsby, React) and multiple storage back‑ends; GoatCounter lists only generic tag and log import.

Umami

Support

GoatCounter offers GitHub and documentation; Umami relies on community support only.

GoatCounter

Scalability

GoatCounter expects larger sites to self‑host, implying better scalability path; Umami notes limited scalability.

GoatCounter

Security & privacy

Both are open‑source, cookie‑free, and privacy‑aware; no differences specified.

Tie

Choose GoatCounter if…

Small‑to‑medium sites that want a quick, hosted solution with minimal setup.

Choose Umami if…

Tech‑savvy teams needing customizable dashboards and framework‑specific integrations.

Common questions

Can I use either tool without hosting it myself?

GoatCounter offers a free hosted tier; Umami does not provide hosted service, only self‑hosted.

Which provides more detailed, real‑time analytics?

Umami includes real‑time data, custom events, and customizable dashboards; GoatCounter’s reporting is basic.

Do both avoid cookies for privacy?

Yes, both claim cookie‑free tracking and focus on privacy.