FindAlternative
Back to Fork

Fork vs Sourcetree

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Fork
ForkA fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows.
Sourcetree
SourcetreeA free Git and Mercurial client that gives developers a visual way to manage repositories, branches, and commits.
Overview
Description

Fork is a desktop Git client for macOS and Windows built by a small independent team. It gives visual interfaces to everyday Git operations like committing, branching, and merging, aimed at developers who want a faster alternative to the command line without losing control. Beyond the basics, Fork includes an interactive rebase editor, a visual merge conflict resolver, image diffing, file history and blame views, and support for Git-flow, Git LFS, submodules, and GPG-signed commits. It's a paid, one-time license with a free trial to test the full feature set.

Sourcetree is a free desktop Git client for Mac and Windows from Atlassian, built to simplify Git and Mercurial version control through a visual interface instead of the command line. It visualizes branches and commits, lets developers stage or discard changes by file, hunk, or line, and includes a remote repository manager for finding and cloning repos. Beyond core commit workflows, Sourcetree supports Git-flow branching, Git Large File Storage (LFS), submodule management, and an interactive rebase tool for cleaning up commit history. It integrates with Bitbucket for account-based repository access and ships in actively updated Mac (4.2.19) and Windows (3.4.31) builds, backed by Atlassian documentation and support.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Free
Category
Version Control
Version Control
Best for
Developers who want a visual Git client for Mac or Windows
Developers and teams who want a visual Git/Mercurial client instead of the command line
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
No
No
api available
No
No
support options
—
Documentation and Atlassian support/blog
key integrations
—
Bitbucket
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Clean, fast interface for everyday Git tasks
  • Strong merge conflict and rebase tooling
  • One-time purchase, no subscription
  • Available for both Mac and Windows
  • Completely free with no paid tier
  • Handles both Git and Mercurial repos
  • Visual branching makes complex history easier to follow
  • Actively maintained by Atlassian with regular version updates
Cons
  • Not free after the trial period
  • No native Linux version
  • Some advanced Git workflows still require the command line
  • No official Linux build
  • Some advanced Git operations still require dropping to command line
  • Interface can feel dense for complete beginners to Git
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Fork

View all →
GitKraken
GitKraken

Cross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph

Compare
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Tower
Tower

The powerful Git client for Mac and Windows

Compare
Sublime Merge
Sublime Merge

A fast, cross-platform Git client from the makers of Sublime Text.

Compare

Alternatives to Sourcetree

View all →
Tower
Tower

The powerful Git client for Mac and Windows

Compare
GitHub Desktop
GitHub Desktop

A free graphical Git client for managing GitHub repositories without the command line.

Compare
Sublime Merge
Sublime Merge

A fast, cross-platform Git client from the makers of Sublime Text.

Compare
GitKraken
GitKraken

Cross-platform Git GUI client with a visual commit graph

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Fork offers a polished, one‑time‑purchase Git client for Mac/Windows with strong rebase and conflict tools, while Sourcetree is a free, cross‑platform Git/Mercurial client with broader repository support but a denser UI.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model: Fork is paid (one‑time), Sourcetree is free.
  • •Platform support: Both lack Linux, but Fork targets only Git; Sourcetree also handles Mercurial.
  • •Built‑in workflow tools: Both have interactive rebase and Git‑flow, but Fork adds GPG signing and GitHub notifications.
  • •Integration focus: Fork integrates with GitHub; Sourcetree integrates with Bitbucket and Atlassian ecosystem.
  • •User experience: Fork is marketed as clean and fast; Sourcetree’s UI is described as dense for beginners.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Sourcetree is free, whereas Fork requires a one‑time purchase after trial.

Sourcetree

Ease of use / learning curve

Fork is described as a clean, fast interface; Sourcetree’s UI can feel dense for beginners.

Fork

Features & depth

Both provide interactive rebase, Git‑flow, LFS, and conflict resolution; Fork adds GPG signing and GitHub notifications.

Tie

Integrations & ecosystem

Sourcetree includes Bitbucket and Atlassian support; Fork only mentions GitHub notifications.

Sourcetree

Collaboration

Sourcetree’s Atlassian support and Mercurial handling aid team collaboration; Fork focuses on individual Git workflows.

Sourcetree

Support

Sourcetree offers documentation and Atlassian support; Fork provides no listed support options.

Sourcetree

Security & privacy

Fork supports GPG signing of commits; Sourcetree’s security features are not specified.

Fork

Choose Fork if…

Individual developers on Mac/Windows who prefer a polished UI, GitHub integration, and are willing to pay once.

Choose Sourcetree if…

Teams or users needing a free tool, Mercurial support, or tighter Atlassian ecosystem integration.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use these tools?

Fork requires a one‑time purchase after a trial; Sourcetree is completely free.

Can I use these clients on Linux?

Neither product offers an official Linux build.

Do both tools support Git‑flow and interactive rebase?

Yes, both Fork and Sourcetree include Git‑flow support and an interactive rebase tool.