FindAlternative
Back to Envio

Envio vs Infura

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Envio
EnvioUltra-fast multi-chain blockchain indexer for building queryable on-chain APIs
Visit
Infura
InfuraBlockchain node infrastructure and APIs for building Web3 applications.
Visit
Overview
Description

Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform centered on HyperIndex, a multi-chain indexer that turns smart contract events into production-ready GraphQL APIs. It also offers HyperSync, a high-speed data retrieval API, and HyperRPC, a read-only JSON-RPC endpoint optimized for data-intensive workloads, across EVM chains, Solana, and Fuel.

Infura is a Web3 development platform, now part of MetaMask Developer, that gives developers reliable API access to major blockchain networks without running their own nodes. It provides high-availability RPC endpoints used to build and scale decentralized applications.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Blockchain Dev
Blockchain Dev
Best for
Web3 developers, protocol teams, and data researchers who need fast, reliable on-chain data indexing
Web3 and blockchain developers
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
api available
Yes
Yes
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Significantly faster event processing than legacy indexing approaches in vendor benchmarks
  • Broad multi-chain support including EVM, Solana, and Fuel
  • Open source with self-hosting available to avoid vendor lock-in
  • Built-in reorg handling reduces indexer maintenance burden
  • Generous free tier for early-stage projects and testing
  • Backed by MetaMask, giving strong ecosystem integration
  • Reliable infrastructure used by major DeFi and Web3 projects
  • Removes need to run and maintain your own blockchain nodes
Cons
  • Newer platform compared to established indexing incumbents
  • Paid usage-based tiers scale with volume and require checking current rate cards
  • HyperPipe data pipeline feature is still in alpha
  • Credit-based pricing can be confusing to estimate costs upfront
  • Paid tiers get expensive at production scale
  • Centralized service, which some Web3 purists see as a trade-off for a decentralized ecosystem
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Envio

View all →
Alchemy
Alchemy

Blockchain developer platform providing node APIs, data APIs, and tooling across 50+ chains.

Compare
Helius
Helius

High-performance RPC and data infrastructure for building on Solana

Compare
Infura
Infura

Blockchain node infrastructure and APIs for building Web3 applications.

Compare
Blockchair
Blockchair

Powerful multi-chain blockchain explorer and analytics platform

Compare

Alternatives to Infura

View all →
Alchemy
Alchemy

Blockchain developer platform providing node APIs, data APIs, and tooling across 50+ chains.

Compare
Helius
Helius

High-performance RPC and data infrastructure for building on Solana

Compare
thirdweb
thirdweb

A Web3 development platform for building blockchain apps, wallets, and AI-agent payments.

Compare
Envio
Envio

Ultra-fast multi-chain blockchain indexer for building queryable on-chain APIs

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Envio offers faster, multi‑chain indexing with self‑hosting and open‑source flexibility, while Infura provides a mature, easy‑to‑use node API with a generous free tier but higher cost at scale.

Key differences

  • •Envio indexes events across 27+ chains (EVM, Solana, Fuel) vs Infura only provides node RPC access.
  • •Envio includes built‑in reorg handling and HyperSync query API; Infura offers generic RPC endpoints.
  • •Envio can be self‑hosted (open source); Infura is a fully managed, closed‑source SaaS.
  • •Pricing model: Envio requires contacting sales (usage‑based tiers); Infura uses subscription/credit tiers with a free tier.
  • •Ecosystem integration: Infura is backed by MetaMask and used by major DeFi projects; Envio has no listed ecosystem partners.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Infura offers a free tier and clear subscription credits; Envio requires contacting sales and usage‑based pricing.

Infura

Ease of use / learning curve

Infura provides ready‑to‑use RPC APIs; Envio requires writing TypeScript handlers and managing deployments.

Infura

Features & depth

Envio adds multi‑chain event indexing, HyperSync queries, and automatic reorg rollback; Infura only offers node RPC.

Envio

Integrations & ecosystem

Infura integrates with MetaMask SDK and is used by Uniswap, Coinbase, Compound; Envio has no listed integrations.

Infura

Collaboration

Envio supports git‑based deployments and local testing framework for collaborative indexer development.

Envio

Scalability

Envio benchmarks claim significantly faster event processing across 27+ chains; Infura scales RPC but lacks indexing.

Envio

Support / lock‑in

Infura is a managed service with established support; Envio can be self‑hosted to avoid vendor lock‑in.

Infura

Choose Envio if…

Teams needing fast, multi‑chain event indexing and want self‑hosting or open‑source control.

Choose Infura if…

Projects that just need reliable RPC access, want a free tier, and prefer a proven managed service.

Common questions

Can I avoid vendor lock‑in with Envio?

Yes, Envio is open source and can be self‑hosted, eliminating reliance on a single SaaS provider.

What free usage does Infura provide?

Infura offers a free tier with several million daily request credits.

Which product supports indexing Solana events?

Envio indexes smart contract events on Solana (and EVM, Fuel); Infura does not provide event indexing.