FindAlternative
Back to Alchemy

Alchemy vs Envio

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Alchemy
AlchemyBlockchain developer platform providing node APIs, data APIs, and tooling across 50+ chains.
Visit
Envio
EnvioUltra-fast multi-chain blockchain indexer for building queryable on-chain APIs
Visit
Overview
Description

Alchemy is a web3 infrastructure platform that gives developers reliable node RPC access, data APIs, and smart wallet tooling for building blockchain applications. It supports Ethereum and 50+ other networks including Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and Solana, and is used by companies like Visa, Circle, Stripe, and OpenSea.

Envio is a blockchain data indexing platform centered on HyperIndex, a multi-chain indexer that turns smart contract events into production-ready GraphQL APIs. It also offers HyperSync, a high-speed data retrieval API, and HyperRPC, a read-only JSON-RPC endpoint optimized for data-intensive workloads, across EVM chains, Solana, and Fuel.

Pricing
Freemium
Contact for Pricing
Category
Blockchain Dev
Blockchain Dev
Best for
Web3 developers and fintech companies building blockchain applications
Web3 developers, protocol teams, and data researchers who need fast, reliable on-chain data indexing
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Docs, standard support (free tier), premium and dedicated support on paid tiers
—
key integrations
Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Solana, and 50+ other chains
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Generous free tier (30M compute units/month) usable for real testing and small apps
  • Broad multi-chain coverage across 50+ networks from one API
  • Used in production by major fintechs like Visa, Circle, and Stripe
  • Usage-based pricing scales cost with actual API consumption
  • Significantly faster event processing than legacy indexing approaches in vendor benchmarks
  • Broad multi-chain support including EVM, Solana, and Fuel
  • Open source with self-hosting available to avoid vendor lock-in
  • Built-in reorg handling reduces indexer maintenance burden
Cons
  • Compute-unit-based billing can be confusing to estimate costs upfront
  • Advanced features like custom rollup infrastructure are aimed at larger teams, not hobbyists
  • Enterprise-grade throughput and SLAs require custom/contact-sales pricing
  • Newer platform compared to established indexing incumbents
  • Paid usage-based tiers scale with volume and require checking current rate cards
  • HyperPipe data pipeline feature is still in alpha
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Alchemy

View all →
Infura
Infura

Blockchain node infrastructure and APIs for building Web3 applications.

Compare
thirdweb
thirdweb

A Web3 development platform for building blockchain apps, wallets, and AI-agent payments.

Compare
Helius
Helius

High-performance RPC and data infrastructure for building on Solana

Compare
Envio
Envio

Ultra-fast multi-chain blockchain indexer for building queryable on-chain APIs

Compare

Alternatives to Envio

View all →
Alchemy
Alchemy

Blockchain developer platform providing node APIs, data APIs, and tooling across 50+ chains.

Compare
Helius
Helius

High-performance RPC and data infrastructure for building on Solana

Compare
Infura
Infura

Blockchain node infrastructure and APIs for building Web3 applications.

Compare
Blockchair
Blockchair

Powerful multi-chain blockchain explorer and analytics platform

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Alchemy offers a generous free tier and broad multi‑chain node/API services with enterprise SLAs, while Envio focuses on ultra‑fast, open‑source indexing with self‑hosting options.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model: Alchemy has a freemium tier with compute‑unit limits; Envio requires contact‑for‑pricing and no free tier.
  • •Core focus: Alchemy provides node RPC, portfolio data, and rollup infrastructure; Envio specializes in high‑speed indexing and query APIs.
  • •Open source & lock‑in: Envio is open source and can be self‑hosted; Alchemy is closed‑source SaaS only.
  • •Supported chains: Alchemy covers 50+ networks; Envio indexes 27+ chains but emphasizes EVM, Solana, Fuel.
  • •Performance claim: Envio advertises faster event processing and HyperSync queries; Alchemy guarantees 99.99% uptime but no specific speed benchmark.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Alchemy offers a freemium tier (30M compute units/month) whereas Envio provides no free tier and requires contact‑for‑pricing.

Alchemy

Ease of use / learning curve

Alchemy’s standard docs and managed SaaS require no self‑hosting; Envio needs TypeScript handlers and optional self‑hosting setup.

Alchemy

Features & depth

Both provide multi‑chain data; Alchemy adds node RPC, gas sponsorship, rollup infra; Envio adds ultra‑fast indexing and reorg handling.

Tie

Integrations & ecosystem

Alchemy lists integration with 50+ chains and is used by Visa, Circle, Stripe; Envio supports 27+ chains.

Alchemy

Collaboration

Envio’s git‑based deployment and open‑source code enable team collaboration and custom extensions.

Envio

Scalability

Alchemy guarantees 99.99% uptime and enterprise‑grade throughput; Envio’s scalability depends on self‑hosted resources.

Alchemy

Support

Alchemy offers tiered support (free docs, premium, dedicated); Envio only lists standard cloud support, no tiers.

Alchemy

Choose Alchemy if…

Enterprises or fintechs needing reliable node access, broad chain coverage, and SLA guarantees.

Choose Envio if…

Teams prioritizing fast, open‑source indexing, self‑hosting, and low vendor lock‑in.

Common questions

Is there a free tier to try the service?

Yes, Alchemy provides a freemium tier (30M compute units/month); Envio does not offer a free tier.

Can I self‑host the solution to avoid vendor lock‑in?

Envio is open source and can be self‑hosted; Alchemy is a closed‑source SaaS only.

Which platform supports the widest range of blockchains?

Alchemy supports 50+ networks; Envio indexes over 27 chains.