Cryptee vs Filen
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cryptee is an end-to-end encrypted platform for storing notes, documents, and photos, built by an Estonian company for users who want an alternative to mainstream cloud storage that does not have access to their data. All content is encrypted on the user's device using AES-256 before it ever leaves for Cryptee's servers, and the service supports Markdown-based documents, tables, code formatting, and offline access alongside encrypted photo storage with hashtag-based organization. The platform includes a distinctive privacy feature called ghost folders, which hide the existence of certain folders entirely so users can plausibly deny having them if coerced into unlocking their account. Cryptee runs entirely in the browser and is accessible on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, and Chrome OS, with no analytics, cookies, trackers, or ads, and offers anonymous signup for users who don't want to provide any personal information.
Filen is a German cloud storage provider built around AES 256-bit client-side encryption and a zero-knowledge architecture, meaning the company itself cannot read stored files. Alongside standard file sync and storage, it offers a network drive that mounts cloud storage as a local drive, encrypted notes with markdown support, and end-to-end encrypted chat. Filen's applications are open source, and the service supports WebDAV and S3 protocols along with a headless CLI for developers and automation. It is positioned as a security-focused alternative for individuals and small teams who want full encryption without losing everyday usability.
- True end-to-end encryption of notes, documents, and photos
- Ghost folders provide a rare plausible-deniability privacy feature
- Works cross-platform through the browser with no native app installs required
- Free tier available with no personal information required to sign up
- Strong zero-knowledge, client-side encryption on all plans including free
- Open source client applications increase transparency
- Low starting price for paid storage tiers
- Includes encrypted notes and chat beyond plain file storage
- Free tier storage is limited to 100 MB, quite small for photo storage
- Being a small independent company, it lacks the ecosystem integrations of larger cloud storage providers
- Browser-based access may feel less integrated than native desktop sync clients
- Pricing is per-tier rather than fully flexible/custom storage amounts on lower plans
- Smaller company means less mature third-party integration ecosystem
- Encrypted architecture means no server-side file previews for some file types
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Cryptee
View all →Alternatives to Filen
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataFilen offers broader feature set and open‑source clients with flexible sync, while Cryptee focuses on ultra‑private, browser‑only notes and photo storage with plausible‑deniability.
Key differences
- •Filen provides native apps and open‑source clients; Cryptee is browser‑only with no native apps
- •Filen supports encrypted chat, notes, and WebDAV/S3 integrations; Cryptee offers ghost folders and hashtag‑based photo organization
- •Filen’s free tier includes unlimited storage (pricing per tier); Cryptee’s free tier is limited to 100 MB
- •Open‑source transparency: Filen is open source; Cryptee is closed source
- •Collaboration: Filen includes real‑time note collaboration and chat; Cryptee has no built‑in team collaboration features
Pricing & value
Filen’s freemium model offers paid tiers with lower per‑GB cost; Cryptee free tier caps at 100 MB.
Ease of use / learning curve
Cryptee runs entirely in the browser, requiring no native client installation.
Features & depth
Filen includes encrypted chat, multiple sync modes, and WebDAV/S3 support beyond basic storage.
Integrations & ecosystem
Filen offers API, WebDAV, and S3‑compatible integrations; Cryptee has no API.
Collaboration
Filen provides real‑time encrypted notes and team chat; Cryptee lacks collaboration tools.
Security & privacy
Both use AES‑256 client‑side encryption; Cryptee adds ghost folders, Filen adds open‑source transparency.
Support
Filen lists 24/7 email support; Cryptee provides no specified support options.
Choose Cryptee if…
Individuals or journalists needing ultra‑private, anonymous, browser‑only storage with plausible‑deniability for small data volumes.
Choose Filen if…
Security‑focused teams needing sync, chat, and integration options with open‑source clients.
Common questions
Can I integrate either service with existing backup tools?
Filen offers WebDAV and S3‑compatible APIs for integration; Cryptee provides no API.
Is there a free tier that allows meaningful photo storage?
Cryptee’s free tier is limited to 100 MB, insufficient for photos; Filen’s free tier offers more storage (exact amount not specified).
What collaboration features are available?
Filen includes encrypted real‑time notes and team chat; Cryptee has no built‑in collaboration.
