CDN77 vs Qovery
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
CDN77 provides a worldwide content delivery network that charges a simple flat rate per terabyte, removing the complexity of tiered pricing and hidden overage fees. Its extensive network of edge POPs spans all major continents, ensuring low‑latency delivery of static assets, APIs, and dynamic content. In addition to standard CDN capabilities, CDN77 offers dedicated video streaming tooling, including HLS/DASH packaging, live‑stream support, and real‑time analytics. The platform also includes SSL/TLS encryption, HTTP/2, and advanced caching rules to secure and accelerate any web property.
Qovery is a deployment platform that provisions infrastructure into your own AWS, GCP, or Azure account, turning Git pushes into live services automatically. It abstracts Kubernetes, Docker, and CI pipelines so developers can focus on code, not ops. The service offers a free tier for small projects and paid plans for teams, providing features like auto-scaling, secret management, and zero-downtime releases while keeping full ownership of the underlying cloud resources.
- Flat-rate per TB pricing
- Extensive global edge network
- Built‑in video streaming support
- Free SSL/TLS and HTTP/2
- Zero-config deployment to your own cloud account.
- Built-in CI/CD eliminates separate pipeline tools.
- Supports AWS, GCP, and Azure with multi-cloud flexibility.
- Free tier sufficient for small projects and prototypes.
- No free tier available
- Pricing may be high for low traffic sites
- Limited custom edge compute (no serverless functions)
- Limited to cloud providers supported by Qovery (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Advanced scaling policies require paid plan.
- User interface can be overwhelming for beginners.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to CDN77
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataQovery is a developer‑focused CI/CD and Kubernetes platform with a free tier for small workloads, while CDN77 is a paid global CDN optimized for static/streaming delivery.
Key differences
- •Qovery provides zero‑config CI/CD and auto‑scaling Kubernetes clusters; CDN77 only delivers content, no compute or CI/CD.
- •Qovery offers a free tier (unlimited projects, 2 GB RAM, 1 vCPU); CDN77 has no free tier and charges flat‑rate per TB.
- •CDN77 guarantees higher uptime SLA (99.99% vs 99.9%) and a larger edge network of 200 POPs.
- •Qovery supports multi‑cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) with dedicated clusters; CDN77 is a single CDN service covering many regions.
Pricing & value
Qovery offers a freemium tier; CDN77 requires paid subscription with flat‑rate per TB.
Uptime & reliability
CDN77 SLA is 99.99%; Qovery SLA is 99.9%.
Performance
CDN77 uses >200 global edge POPs for low latency delivery; Qovery runs in user‑owned cloud clusters.
Developer experience
Qovery provides built‑in CI/CD, Git sync, auto‑scaling, and Kubernetes IaC; CDN77 focuses only on content delivery.
Regions & compliance
CDN77 lists specific regions worldwide; Qovery limited to regions offered by AWS/GCP/Azure.
Support
Neither product’s support details are specified in the provided facts.
Lock‑in
Qovery ties you to supported cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure); CDN77 is a standalone service but no lock‑in details given.
Choose CDN77 if…
Sites or media services requiring high‑performance global delivery and video streaming.
Choose Qovery if…
Developers needing integrated CI/CD, Kubernetes, and a free tier for prototypes.
Common questions
Is there any free tier to try the service?
Qovery offers a free tier with unlimited projects (2 GB RAM, 1 vCPU); CDN77 has no free tier.
Which service provides higher availability?
CDN77 guarantees 99.99% uptime; Qovery guarantees 99.9% uptime.
Can I use these services for CI/CD pipelines?
Qovery includes built‑in CI/CD and auto‑scaling; CDN77 does not provide CI/CD capabilities.