BestCrypt Container Encryption vs Cryptomator
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
BestCrypt Container Encryption, made by Finnish security vendor Jetico, creates encrypted virtual containers that behave like normal drives or folders for storing sensitive files. It is built to protect data placed in cloud-sync folders such as Dropbox: because the container is encrypted before it syncs, the underlying cloud provider and anyone who compromises the cloud account only ever sees encrypted bytes. The product works across Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android, and includes a portable BCTraveller tool for accessing encrypted containers on machines without BestCrypt installed. Jetico has built encryption and secure-wiping software for over 30 years and markets BestCrypt alongside its BestCrypt Volume Encryption and data-wiping product lines for endpoint data protection.
Cryptomator is free, open-source software that creates password-protected encrypted 'vaults' on your device, encrypting both file contents and filenames with AES-256 before anything reaches a cloud provider. It works transparently with virtually any cloud storage service, including Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and iCloud, mounting the vault as a virtual drive so encrypted files behave like a normal folder. Because encryption happens entirely on the local device, the cloud provider only ever stores unreadable ciphertext. The desktop client is free and donation-supported, mobile apps carry a small one-time purchase, and Cryptomator Hub offers GDPR-compliant, centrally managed vault access for small teams.
- Encrypts data before it reaches cloud sync folders
- Long-established vendor with decades of encryption experience
- Cross-platform support including Android
- Portable access option without installing the full app
- Open-source and independently audited
- Works with any cloud storage provider
- Free desktop client
- Simple password-based vault model
- Pricing is not published and requires visiting the store or requesting a quote
- Interface is more utilitarian than consumer-focused encryption tools
- Best suited to users already comfortable managing encrypted containers
- Mobile apps require a paid purchase
- No built-in cloud storage of its own
- Team features (Hub) are a separate paid product
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to BestCrypt Container Encryption
View all →
Open-source encryption tool that hides file contents, names, and folder structure before cloud sync.
Open-source client-side encryption that locks individual files before they sync to any cloud drive.
Alternatives to Cryptomator
View all →
Open-source encryption tool that hides file contents, names, and folder structure before cloud sync.
Cross-platform encrypted containers from Jetico for protecting files on disk and in cloud storage.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBestCrypt offers enterprise‑grade, cross‑platform encrypted containers with a long vendor history but undisclosed pricing, while Cryptomator provides free, open‑source vaults that work with any cloud service but requires paid mobile apps and separate team features.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: BestCrypt requires a quote; Cryptomator is freemium with optional paid mobile/Hub.
- •Source code: BestCrypt is closed‑source; Cryptomator is open‑source and independently audited.
- •Platform support: Both are cross‑platform, but BestCrypt adds Android portable tool; Cryptomator mobile apps are paid.
- •Container features: BestCrypt offers deniable encryption and external‑drive support; Cryptomator encrypts filenames and contents but lacks deniability.
- •Target audience: BestCrypt suits businesses comfortable managing containers; Cryptomator fits individuals/small teams seeking free, simple encryption.
Pricing & value
Cryptomator is freemium with free desktop client; BestCrypt requires contacting for pricing, no public cost info.
Ease of use / learning curve
Cryptomator uses simple vault model; BestCrypt’s container management is more utilitarian and may need expertise.
Features & depth
BestCrypt includes deniable encryption, portable BCTraveller, external‑drive support; Cryptomator lacks these advanced features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Cryptomator works transparently with any cloud provider; BestCrypt only mentions syncing with Dropbox and similar services.
Collaboration
Cryptomator Hub offers team‑focused, GDPR‑compliant management; BestCrypt has no built‑in team or collaboration features.
Scalability
Cryptomator’s Hub is designed for teams; BestCrypt is aimed at individual or business users without explicit scaling features.
Support
BestCrypt provides email support and a free trial; Cryptomator offers community forum plus email, but no dedicated support tier mentioned.
Security & privacy
Both encrypt data before cloud sync; BestCrypt offers deniable encryption; Cryptomator encrypts filenames and is open‑source audited.
Migration / lock‑in
Cryptomator’s open‑source vaults are portable across platforms; BestCrypt’s proprietary containers may lock users into Jetico tools.
Choose BestCrypt Container Encryption if…
Enterprises or power users needing advanced container features, deniable encryption, and vendor support, and willing to pay for a quote.
Choose Cryptomator if…
Individuals or small teams wanting free, open‑source encryption that works with any cloud service, accepting paid mobile apps if needed.
Common questions
What are the costs for each solution?
BestCrypt requires contacting Jetico for pricing; Cryptomator offers a free desktop client with optional paid mobile apps and a paid Hub for teams.
Is the software open‑source and auditable?
BestCrypt is closed‑source; Cryptomator is fully open‑source with independent audits available.
Can I use the encryption with any cloud provider?
Cryptomator works with any cloud service; BestCrypt mentions Dropbox sync but does not claim universal cloud compatibility.