BestCrypt Container Encryption vs CryFS
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
BestCrypt Container Encryption, made by Finnish security vendor Jetico, creates encrypted virtual containers that behave like normal drives or folders for storing sensitive files. It is built to protect data placed in cloud-sync folders such as Dropbox: because the container is encrypted before it syncs, the underlying cloud provider and anyone who compromises the cloud account only ever sees encrypted bytes. The product works across Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android, and includes a portable BCTraveller tool for accessing encrypted containers on machines without BestCrypt installed. Jetico has built encryption and secure-wiping software for over 30 years and markets BestCrypt alongside its BestCrypt Volume Encryption and data-wiping product lines for endpoint data protection.
CryFS is a free, open-source cryptographic filesystem that encrypts files locally before they are synced to cloud storage providers like Dropbox, Google Drive, iCloud, or OneDrive. Unlike tools that only encrypt file contents, CryFS also hides file sizes, file names, and the directory structure itself, so a compromised cloud provider cannot infer what is stored.
- Encrypts data before it reaches cloud sync folders
- Long-established vendor with decades of encryption experience
- Cross-platform support including Android
- Portable access option without installing the full app
- Completely free and open source
- Hides metadata (names, sizes, structure), not just content
- Works with any cloud storage provider's sync client
- Actively maintained on GitHub
- Pricing is not published and requires visiting the store or requesting a quote
- Interface is more utilitarian than consumer-focused encryption tools
- Best suited to users already comfortable managing encrypted containers
- Requires comfort with command-line tools and FUSE/Dokany setup
- Windows and newer macOS support has historically lagged behind Linux
- No official GUI, so it's less approachable for non-technical users
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to BestCrypt Container Encryption
View all →Open-source encryption tool that hides file contents, names, and folder structure before cloud sync.

Open-source client-side encryption that locks individual files before they sync to any cloud drive.
Alternatives to CryFS
View all →
Open-source client-side encryption that locks individual files before they sync to any cloud drive.
Cross-platform encrypted containers from Jetico for protecting files on disk and in cloud storage.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataCryFS is a free, open‑source tool that encrypts file contents and metadata for any cloud sync service, but requires command‑line/FUSE setup; BestCrypt offers commercial, cross‑platform encrypted containers with a GUI‑style interface and support, but at undisclosed cost.
Key differences
- •CryFS is free and open source; BestCrypt requires a paid license (price not disclosed).
- •CryFS hides filenames, sizes, and directory structure; BestCrypt focuses on encrypted containers without explicit metadata hiding.
- •CryFS relies on command‑line/FUSE setup and lacks a GUI; BestCrypt provides a more user‑friendly interface and portable BCTraveller tool.
- •BestCrypt supports Android and offers portable container access; CryFS only mentions Linux/macOS (Windows support lagging).
- •BestCrypt includes vendor support (email, free trial); CryFS has community maintenance only.
Pricing & value
CryFS is free and open source; BestCrypt requires contacting vendor for pricing.
Ease of use / learning curve
BestCrypt provides a GUI and portable tool; CryFS needs command‑line/FUSE setup and no official GUI.
Features & depth
Both encrypt data before cloud sync; CryFS also hides metadata, BestCrypt offers deniable encryption and Android support.
Integrations & ecosystem
CryFS works with any cloud sync client (Dropbox, Google Drive, iCloud, OneDrive) via filesystem mount.
Collaboration
CryFS’s filesystem approach lets any synced folder be shared; BestCrypt containers must be shared as whole files.
Scalability
CryFS stores data as encrypted blocks, allowing incremental sync; BestCrypt containers are monolithic files.
Support
BestCrypt offers email support and a free trial; CryFS relies on community GitHub maintenance.
Security & privacy
CryFS uses authenticated encryption (AES‑256‑GCM or XChaCha20‑Poly1305) and hides metadata; BestCrypt’s encryption details not specified.
Migration / lock‑in
CryFS data is standard encrypted blocks readable via open source tools; BestCrypt containers are proprietary.
Choose BestCrypt Container Encryption if…
Professionals or businesses willing to pay for a supported, cross‑platform container solution with GUI and Android access.
Choose CryFS if…
Tech‑savvy individuals or developers needing free, metadata‑hiding encryption for any cloud provider.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use CryFS or BestCrypt?
CryFS is free and open source; BestCrypt requires a paid license (price not published).
Can I use these tools on Windows?
CryFS historically lags on Windows support; BestCrypt supports Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android.
Do either of these hide file names and sizes from the cloud provider?
CryFS encrypts and hides filenames, sizes, and directory structure; BestCrypt encrypts file contents but does not specify metadata hiding.

