FindAlternative
Back to BeagleBone Black

BeagleBone Black vs Radxa Rock 3A

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
BeagleBone Black
BeagleBone BlackA powerful, community-supported open-source development board for makers and engineers.
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3AA high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.
Overview
Description

The BeagleBone Black is a low-cost, community-supported development platform featuring an AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor. It runs full-featured Linux distributions and offers extensive expansion capabilities through dual 46-pin headers. Designed for hobbyists, educators, and embedded developers, the board integrates 512MB of DDR3 RAM and 4GB of on-board eMMC flash storage preloaded with Debian. Its unique Programmable Real-Time Unit (PRU) subsystems allow for deterministic, low-latency real-time I/O operations.

The Radxa Rock 3A is a versatile single-board computer designed for developers, IoT enthusiasts, and makers seeking robust computing power in a compact form factor. Equipped with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor and up to 8GB of LPDDR4 RAM, it delivers reliable performance for edge computing, media streaming, and home automation projects. Featuring comprehensive connectivity options including M.2 NVMe SSD support, Gigabit Ethernet, and multiple USB ports, the board bridges the gap between desktop-class utility and embedded hardware flexibility. It supports various Linux distributions and Android, making it an adaptable platform for prototyping and custom industrial deployments.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
ARM Single-Board Computers
ARM Single-Board Computers
Best for
Embedded developers and hardware hobbyists
Developers, IoT engineers, and hardware hobbyists
Specifications
General
msrp
$65
$35 - $75 depending on RAM configuration46%
Specifications
weight
40g
45g+13%
warranty
1 year
1 year
dimensions
8.6 x 5.4 cm
85 x 56 mm+888%
open source
Yes
No
connectivity
10/100 Ethernet, USB 2.0 Host, USB Client
Gigabit Ethernet, optional Wi-Fi/Bluetooth via M.2 E Key
power source
USB Powered
USB Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Full open-source hardware design with accessible schematics
  • Dual PRU coprocessors allow for real-time operations
  • Pre-flashed Debian Linux on built-in eMMC storage
  • Vibrant community and extensive documentation available
  • High-speed NVMe SSD support via M.2 slot
  • Reliable quad-core ARM performance
  • Dual display capabilities up to 4K
  • Extensive operating system support
Cons
  • Lacks built-in wireless connectivity like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Only 512MB of RAM limits heavy multi-threaded applications
  • Can be more difficult for absolute beginners compared to Arduino
  • Requires separate purchase of power supply and storage
  • Limited community documentation compared to older Raspberry Pi models
  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth require an optional module
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to BeagleBone Black

View all →
Banana Pi
Banana Pi

Versatile open-source single-board computers for IoT, routing, and STEM.

Compare
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3A

A high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4

Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing

Compare
Teensy 4.1
Teensy 4.1

A high-performance ARM Cortex-M7 development board designed for demanding embedded applications.

Compare

Alternatives to Radxa Rock 3A

View all →
Banana Pi
Banana Pi

Versatile open-source single-board computers for IoT, routing, and STEM.

Compare
BeagleBone Black
BeagleBone Black

A powerful, community-supported open-source development board for makers and engineers.

Compare
Google Coral Dev Board
Google Coral Dev Board

A single-board computer with a removable system-on-module for edge AI applications.

Compare
LattePanda
LattePanda

A pocket-sized x86 single-board computer running Windows and Linux with an integrated Arduino co-processor.

Compare