FindAlternative
Back to Radxa Rock 3A

Radxa Rock 3A vs Rock Pi 4

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3AA high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing
Overview
Description

The Radxa Rock 3A is a versatile single-board computer designed for developers, IoT enthusiasts, and makers seeking robust computing power in a compact form factor. Equipped with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A55 processor and up to 8GB of LPDDR4 RAM, it delivers reliable performance for edge computing, media streaming, and home automation projects. Featuring comprehensive connectivity options including M.2 NVMe SSD support, Gigabit Ethernet, and multiple USB ports, the board bridges the gap between desktop-class utility and embedded hardware flexibility. It supports various Linux distributions and Android, making it an adaptable platform for prototyping and custom industrial deployments.

The Rock Pi 4 is a compact single-board computer featuring a hexa‑core Rockchip RK3399 processor, up to 4 GB LPDDR4 RAM, and dual‑channel M.2 NVMe support. It offers a rich I/O set including dual HDMI 4K, USB‑C 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet, and Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth for versatile connectivity. Designed for developers, makers, and edge‑AI projects, the board runs Linux, Android, and various open‑source OSes, providing a flexible platform for everything from media servers to AI inference workloads.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
ARM Single-Board Computers
ARM Single-Board Computers
Best for
Developers, IoT engineers, and hardware hobbyists
Developers and AI hobbyists
Specifications
General
msrp
$35 - $75 depending on RAM configuration−65%
$99
Specifications
weight
45g
55 g+22%
warranty
1 year
1 year
dimensions
85 x 56 mm
85 x 56 x 14 mm
open source
No
Yes
connectivity
Gigabit Ethernet, optional Wi-Fi/Bluetooth via M.2 E Key
Wi‑Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB‑C 3.0, USB‑A 3.0, HDMI 2.0
power source
USB Powered
USB Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-speed NVMe SSD support via M.2 slot
  • Reliable quad-core ARM performance
  • Dual display capabilities up to 4K
  • Extensive operating system support
  • High‑performance RK3399 CPU
  • M.2 NVMe slot for fast storage
  • Dual 4K HDMI outputs
  • Strong community and open‑source support
Cons
  • Requires separate purchase of power supply and storage
  • Limited community documentation compared to older Raspberry Pi models
  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth require an optional module
  • Wi‑Fi limited to 802.11ac (no Wi‑Fi 6)
  • Limited official Android builds
  • Power consumption higher than low‑end SBCs
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Radxa Rock 3A

View all →
Khadas VIM4
Khadas VIM4

Compact AI‑ready SBC with octa‑core CPU, 8 GB RAM and HDMI‑in/out

Compare
ODROID-C4
ODROID-C4

A high-performance quad-core single board computer built for power efficiency.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4

Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing

Compare
Orange Pi 5 Plus
Orange Pi 5 Plus

Powerful RK3588 SBC with dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet and M.2 storage

Compare

Alternatives to Rock Pi 4

View all →
Orange Pi 5 Plus
Orange Pi 5 Plus

Powerful RK3588 SBC with dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet and M.2 storage

Compare
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3A

A high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.

Compare
Raspberry Pi 5
Raspberry Pi 5

A compact, affordable single-board computer for makers and developers.

Compare
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B

A powerful credit-card-sized computer designed for makers, educators, and hobbyists.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Rock Pi 4 offers higher CPU performance and built‑in Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth at a higher price, while Radxa Rock 3A is cheaper but needs extra modules for wireless and storage.

Key differences

  • •CPU: RK3399 hexa‑core vs RK3568 quad‑core Cortex‑A55
  • •Integrated Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth on Rock Pi 4 vs optional via M.2 on Rock 3A
  • •M.2 slot: NVMe ready on both, but Rock Pi 4 includes it standard; Rock 3A requires separate SSD purchase
  • •Price: fixed $99 for Rock Pi 4 vs $35‑$75 depending on RAM for Rock 3A
  • •Open‑source driver support: Yes for Rock Pi 4, No for Rock 3A
DimensionWinner

Performance

Rock Pi 4’s hexa‑core RK3399 up to 2 GHz outperforms Rock 3A’s quad‑core Cortex‑A55.

Rock Pi 4

Build quality

Both have similar dimensions (85 × 56 mm) and lightweight designs; no quality differences specified.

Tie

Connectivity

Rock Pi 4 includes built‑in Wi‑Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0; Rock 3A needs optional modules.

Rock Pi 4

Power & efficiency

Rock 3A’s lower‑end processor and lower MSRP suggest lower power draw than Rock Pi 4.

Radxa Rock 3A

Compatibility

Rock 3A supports multiple OSes (Debian, Ubuntu, Android) explicitly; Rock Pi 4 mentions Linux and Android but fewer OS names.

Radxa Rock 3A

Price & value

Rock 3A ranges $35‑$75 versus Rock Pi 4’s fixed $99, offering better upfront value.

Radxa Rock 3A

Warranty & support

Both provide 1‑year warranty; community support stronger for Rock Pi 4 per pros.

Tie

Choose Radxa Rock 3A if…

Projects on a tight budget that can add separate Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth and SSD modules.

Choose Rock Pi 4 if…

Developers needing strong CPU power and built‑in Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth for AI or edge tasks.

Common questions

Which board is cheaper out of the box?

Radxa Rock 3A, priced $35‑$75 depending on RAM, versus Rock Pi 4’s fixed $99.

Do both boards have built‑in Wi‑Fi?

Rock Pi 4 includes Wi‑Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0; Rock 3A requires an optional M.2 E‑key Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth module.

Can I use an NVMe SSD without extra purchases?

Rock Pi 4’s M.2 slot supports NVMe SSDs directly; Rock 3A’s M.2 slot also supports NVMe but you must buy the SSD separately.