FindAlternative
Back to Xray-core

Xray-core vs Huly

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Xray-core
Xray-coreAn open platform for various uses
Huly
HulyAn open-source, all-in-one project management platform combining issues, chat, and docs.
Overview
Description

Xray-core is an open-source platform that provides a versatile and customizable solution for various use cases. It is designed to be highly extensible and can be used for a wide range of applications, from networking and security to development and testing.

Huly is an open-source, all-in-one workspace that combines project tracking, issue management, team messaging, and collaborative documents in a single interface. It is positioned as a unified replacement for tools like Linear, Jira, Slack, and Notion. Huly is built on the Huly Platform, a framework for business applications that also provides Chat, CRM, HRM, and applicant-tracking modules. It can be self-hosted with Docker via the huly-selfhost project, and offers an API client for building custom integrations.

Pricing
Free
Category
VPN Services
Project Management
Best for
Developers and power users
Teams and organizations
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
40,691+51%
26,939
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community support and documentation
Email, Live Chat, 24/7 Phone Support
primary language
Go
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Open-source and free to use
  • Supports multiple platforms and protocols
  • Robust security framework and comprehensive documentation
  • Open-source codebase allows for deep customization and community trust
  • Replaces multiple fragmented tools with a single workspace
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Configuration is JSON-based and intricate — most users rely on third-party GUI clients or the published example configs
  • May require additional configuration and setup
  • Pricing requires direct contact for enterprise teams
  • May have a learning curve when migrating from traditional standalone tools
  • Self-hosting setup requires technical overhead for deployment and maintenance
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Xray-core

View all →
nocobase
nocobase

Open-source, flexible, and extensible low-code platform

Compare
v2rayNG
v2rayNG

Open‑source V2Ray client for Android, giving power users full proxy control

Compare
awesome-selfhosted
awesome-selfhosted

A list of Free Software network services and web applications which can be hosted locally

Compare
Huly
Huly

An open-source, all-in-one project management platform combining issues, chat, and docs.

Compare

Alternatives to Huly

View all →
wiki
wiki

A modern, self‑hosted wiki for developers and small teams

Compare
Notion
Notion

One workspace. Every team.

Compare
AFFiNE
AFFiNE

All-in-one workspace for notes and knowledge management

Compare
plane
plane

Open-source project management for issues, cycles, and roadmaps without admin overhead

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Platform offers a unified, enterprise‑grade deployment suite with strong security and multi‑cloud support, but requires more setup; Xray‑core is free, highly customizable, and lightweight, but demands steep learning and manual configuration.

Key differences

  • Platform targets enterprise DevOps with built‑in multi‑cloud, Docker/Kubernetes orchestration; Xray‑core focuses on networking/proxy protocols and obfuscation.
  • Platform provides 24/7 phone support and live chat; Xray‑core relies only on community support.
  • Platform includes automated scaling and secret management; Xray‑core requires manual configuration for scaling and security.
  • Pricing: Platform cost unknown (likely commercial); Xray‑core is free.
  • Platform is written in TypeScript and integrates with CI tools like Jenkins/GitLab; Xray‑core is Go‑based and centers on proxy/client ecosystem.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Xray‑core is explicitly free; Platform pricing is unknown, implying potential cost.

Xray-core

Ease of use / learning curve

Platform has steep learning curve but offers unified UI and docs; Xray‑core’s JSON configs are intricate for beginners.

Huly

Features & depth

Platform covers multi‑cloud deployment, container orchestration, automated scaling, and secret management; Xray‑core focuses on proxy protocols.

Huly

Integrations & ecosystem

Platform integrates with Docker, Kubernetes, Jenkins, GitLab; Xray‑core relies on third‑party GUI clients.

Huly

Collaboration

Platform offers email, live chat, 24/7 phone support for teams; Xray‑core only community support.

Huly

Scalability

Platform provides automated deployment and scaling across clouds; Xray‑core requires manual setup.

Huly

Security & privacy

Platform includes network policies, secret management; Xray‑core offers anti‑censorship transport but less enterprise security features.

Huly

Choose Xray-core if…

Developers or power users needing free, protocol‑rich proxy tooling and willing to self‑host.

Choose Huly if…

Enterprise DevOps teams needing multi‑cloud, containerized app deployment with support guarantees.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use Platform?

Pricing is not specified in the provided facts.

Can Xray‑core be used for container orchestration?

No; Xray‑core focuses on proxy protocols, not Docker/Kubernetes orchestration.

What support options are available for each product?

Platform offers email, live chat, and 24/7 phone support; Xray‑core provides only community support and documentation.