FindAlternative
Back to Testim

Testim vs Tricentis Testim

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Testim
TestimAI-powered test automation for web, mobile, and Salesforce, now part of Tricentis.
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis TestimAI-powered test automation with smart locators for stable web and Salesforce testing.
Overview
Description

Testim is an AI-powered test automation platform, owned by Tricentis, that helps teams create and maintain automated tests for web applications, mobile apps, and Salesforce environments. It lets users describe testing needs in natural language and uses AI to build tests, then relies on smart, ML-based locators that keep tests working even as the underlying application changes.

Tricentis Testim is an AI-powered test automation product, now part of the Tricentis portfolio, that helps QA teams author and maintain tests for web and Salesforce applications with minimal upkeep. It uses smart, AI-based locators and visual validation to keep tests stable as an application's UI changes, and supports agentic AI test creation from natural-language descriptions.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Category
Testing & QA
Testing & QA
Best for
QA engineers and teams automating web, mobile, and Salesforce testing
QA teams automating web and Salesforce application testing
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
key integrations
Jenkins, CircleCI, GitHub, Jira
Salesforce, Jenkins, Jira, GitHub, Azure DevOps
support options
—
Email, Support Portal, Documentation
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • AI-assisted test creation reduces manual scripting effort
  • Self-healing locators cut down on flaky test maintenance
  • Dedicated product line specifically for Salesforce testing
  • Integrates with common CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and GitHub
  • Smart locators meaningfully reduce maintenance from minor UI changes
  • Dedicated Salesforce testing support is a differentiator versus generic tools
  • Backed by Tricentis, an established enterprise test automation vendor
  • Agentic natural-language test creation lowers the barrier to writing new tests
Cons
  • Detailed pricing isn't published; most tiers require contacting sales
  • Separate product lines (Web, Mobile, Salesforce) add complexity to evaluate
  • AI-generated tests still need review for critical business flows
  • Pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting Tricentis
  • Now bundled into a larger vendor portfolio, which can complicate standalone purchasing
  • Best suited to teams already testing primarily on the web or Salesforce, not deep mobile-native testing
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Testim

View all →
Testsigma
Testsigma

AI-powered test automation for web, mobile, API, and Salesforce applications

Compare
TestComplete
TestComplete

Automated UI testing across desktop, web, and mobile applications

Compare
ACCELQ
ACCELQ

AI-powered codeless test automation platform for web, API, mobile, and desktop.

Compare
mabl
mabl

AI-native agentic testing platform for web, mobile, API, and performance testing.

Compare

Alternatives to Tricentis Testim

View all →
Testim
Testim

AI-powered test automation for web, mobile, and Salesforce, now part of Tricentis.

Compare
TestComplete
TestComplete

Automated UI testing across desktop, web, and mobile applications

Compare
Testsigma
Testsigma

AI-powered test automation for web, mobile, API, and Salesforce applications

Compare
mabl
mabl

AI-native agentic testing platform for web, mobile, API, and performance testing.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both tools offer AI‑driven test automation with smart locators and Salesforce support, but Testim (A) emphasizes broader mobile testing while Tricentis Testim (B) adds visual validation and a wider CI/CD ecosystem.

Key differences

  • •Mobile testing: A includes cloud‑based real/virtual iOS/Android devices; B notes limited mobile focus.
  • •Visual validation: B provides built‑in visual regression checks; A does not mention this.
  • •Integration breadth: B lists Azure DevOps and broader CI/CD tools; A lists Jenkins, CircleCI, GitHub only.
  • •Support options: B specifies email, support portal, documentation; A gives no support detail.
  • •Product positioning: B is marketed as part of the larger Tricentis portfolio, potentially affecting purchasing complexity.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both require contacting sales; no public pricing, so value cannot be directly compared.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

A highlights low‑code authoring and AI‑generated tests from natural language, directly targeting QA engineers.

Testim

Features & depth

B adds visual validation, API testing capability, and broader CI/CD integration, extending test coverage.

Tricentis Testim

Integrations & ecosystem

B lists Azure DevOps and more CI/CD tools; A lists fewer integrations.

Tricentis Testim

Collaboration

Both provide API access and integrate with Jira/GitHub, but no specific collaboration features are detailed.

Tie

Scalability

A mentions cloud‑based mobile device farms, indicating capacity for large‑scale mobile test execution.

Testim

Support

B explicitly offers email, support portal, and documentation; A does not specify support options.

Tricentis Testim

Choose Testim if…

Teams needing extensive mobile testing on real/virtual devices and a low‑code AI test creator.

Choose Tricentis Testim if…

Organizations focused on web/Salesforce with visual regression needs and broader CI/CD integration.

Common questions

Is there any publicly available pricing?

Both products list pricing as “Contact for Pricing”; no public price information is provided.

Which tool supports mobile testing out of the box?

Testim (Product A) includes cloud‑based real and virtual iOS/Android device testing; B notes limited mobile support.

Do either of the tools offer visual regression testing?

Only Tricentis Testim (Product B) mentions built‑in visual validation for layout and rendering checks.