StatusCake vs uptime-kuma
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
StatusCake is a website and infrastructure monitoring platform offering uptime monitoring, page speed tracking, SSL certificate expiration alerts, domain expiry and DNS monitoring, and server health monitoring. Paid plans check sites as frequently as every 30 seconds from more than 30 global monitoring locations.
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted uptime and status page that allows you to monitor your websites and applications. It provides a simple and easy-to-use interface to create and manage your status pages.
- Free tier includes 10 monitors, useful for small projects
- Checks as frequent as 30 seconds on the Business plan
- Covers uptime, SSL, domain, and page speed monitoring in one platform
- Long track record, serving over 220,000 customers since 2012
- Self-hosted solution for maximum control and security
- Customizable status pages with your own branding
- Real-time monitoring and alert system
- Support for multiple languages
- Free tier's 5-minute check interval is slower than paid competitors' free tiers in some cases
- Specific paid plan prices are not listed publicly and require visiting the pricing page
- Advanced team and reporting features are reserved for higher-priced tiers
- Limited scalability
- Steep learning curve for customization
- Limited support for advanced features
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to StatusCake
View all →
Alternatives to uptime-kuma
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataUptime‑Kuma is a free, self‑hosted tool offering full control but limited scalability, while StatusCake provides a cloud SaaS with broader monitoring types and enterprise support at a freemium cost.
Key differences
- •Deployment model: self‑hosted (A) vs cloud SaaS (B).
- •Monitoring scope: only uptime (A) vs uptime, SSL, domain, page‑speed (B).
- •Pricing structure: completely free (A) vs free tier with limits and paid plans (B).
- •Scalability & maintenance: limited by your own infrastructure (A) vs managed, globally distributed checks (B).
- •Support channels: community GitHub/Forum (A) vs email and dedicated enterprise support (B).
Pricing & value
A is fully free and open‑source; B offers a free tier but most features require paid plans.
Ease of use / learning curve
B is a hosted SaaS with ready‑made UI; A requires self‑hosting and custom configuration.
Features & depth
B includes uptime, SSL, domain expiry, and page‑speed monitoring; A focuses on uptime only.
Integrations & ecosystem
A lists specific integrations (Discord, Telegram, GitHub) and is extensible via plugins; B mentions generic alert integrations only.
Collaboration
B provides public/private status pages and team alert routing; A’s collaboration features are limited to community support.
Scalability
B runs on a cloud platform with 30+ global check locations; A’s scalability depends on your own hosting resources.
Support
B offers email support and dedicated enterprise support; A relies on GitHub issues and community forum.
Security & privacy
A is self‑hosted, giving full control over data; B stores monitoring data in the vendor’s cloud.
Migration / lock‑in
A’s open‑source code can be moved or modified freely; B’s SaaS creates vendor lock‑in.
Choose StatusCake if…
Organizations that want a managed, multi‑type monitoring service with team collaboration and enterprise support.
Choose uptime-kuma if…
Teams that need full data control, have hosting expertise, and only require basic uptime monitoring.
Common questions
Can I use StatusCake without paying for a plan?
Yes, a free tier exists but limits you to 10 monitors and a 5‑minute check interval.
Do I need to maintain any servers to run Uptime‑Kuma?
Yes, it must be self‑hosted; you are responsible for deployment, updates, and scaling.
Which tool offers SSL certificate expiration alerts?
StatusCake includes SSL monitoring; Uptime‑Kuma does not list SSL alerts in its features.