FindAlternative
Back to QNAP TS-464

QNAP TS-464 vs Synology DS923+

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
QNAP TS-464
QNAP TS-464Four-bay desktop NAS with advanced connectivity and hardware transcoding
Synology DS923+
Synology DS923+A 4-bay NAS for home and small-business network storage.
Overview
Description

The QNAP TS-464 is a four-bay desktop NAS designed for home and small business users. It features dual 2.5GbE ports for high-speed networking, a PCIe expansion slot for adding additional functionality, and hardware transcoding for efficient video processing. With its compact design and quiet operation, the TS-464 is an ideal solution for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich NAS.

The Synology DS923+ is a 4-bay network-attached storage device designed for home labs and small businesses that need reliable, expandable file storage with built-in backup, media serving, and virtualization capabilities. Running Synology's DiskStation Manager (DSM) operating system, it offers a polished web-based interface for managing storage pools, running Docker containers, hosting Plex-style media libraries, and automating backups from multiple computers on the network. Dual M.2 NVMe slots allow SSD caching to speed up frequently accessed files, and an expansion unit can add five more bays for growing storage needs without replacing the whole system.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)

Around $600 for the diskless enclosure.

Category
NAS Devices
NAS Devices
Best for
Home users and small business owners
Home labs and small businesses
Specifications
General
msrp
$599
Specifications
weight
3.5 kg
warranty
2 years
dimensions
177 x 225 x 142 mm
open source
No
No
connectivity
Dual 2.5GbE, USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 2.0
power source
AC Powered
platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android
deployment
Physical device
api available
Yes
support options
Documentation, Community, Support Tickets
key integrations
Docker, Plex, cloud backup services
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-speed networking with dual 2.5GbE ports
  • Flexible storage options with 4-bay design
  • Efficient video processing with hardware transcoding
  • Compact and quiet design suitable for home or small office use
  • Polished, easy-to-use DSM software
  • Reliable and expandable storage
  • Strong Docker/virtualization support
  • Good community and documentation
Cons
  • Limited scalability with only 4 bays
  • No built-in Wi-Fi or 10GbE support
  • Requires technical expertise for setup and configuration
  • Premium pricing versus building your own NAS
  • Drives sold separately add to cost
  • CPU can bottleneck heavy transcoding
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
7
User rating
Not enough data
3.8 (4)

What reviewers say

QNAP TS-464 Reviews

No reviews yet.

Synology DS923+ Reviews

3.8 (4)
Verified User

Good, not great

Mixed feelings about Synology DS923+ after using it for a while. On the plus side, strong docker/virtualization support. That said, premium pricing versus building your own nas, which held us back from rating it higher.

Verified User

Does exactly what we need

We've been using Synology DS923+ for a few months now and it's genuinely made a difference. Good community and documentation. One minor gripe: cpu can bottleneck heavy transcoding, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend.

Verified User

Solid choice

I picked up Synology DS923+ a while back and haven't looked back. Strong Docker/virtualization support. No major complaints so far. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to QNAP TS-464

View all →

No alternatives listed yet. Browse similar tools →

Alternatives to Synology DS923+

View all →
Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine
Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine

An all-in-one router, firewall, and network controller for prosumers.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both are solid 4‑bay NASes for home or small‑business use, but QNAP TS‑464 wins on built‑in high‑speed networking and hardware transcoding, while Synology DS923+ offers a more polished OS and stronger Docker support.

Key differences

  • QNAP includes dual 2.5 GbE ports for faster wired networking out of the box; Synology relies on standard 1 GbE.
  • Synology’s DSM software is praised for ease of use and Docker/virtualization integration; QNAP uses QTS, which is less highlighted for containers.
  • QNAP provides hardware video transcoding for 4K playback; Synology’s CPU may bottleneck heavy transcoding tasks.
  • Synology offers dual M.2 NVMe slots for SSD caching, a feature not listed for QNAP.
  • QNAP has a PCIe slot for future 10 GbE or Wi‑Fi upgrades; Synology lacks an expansion slot.
DimensionWinner

Performance

QNAP TS‑464 includes hardware transcoding for 4K video, giving it an edge over Synology’s CPU‑limited transcoding.

QNAP TS-464

Build quality

Both are compact, quiet 4‑bay desktop units with similar dimensions and weight.

Tie

Connectivity

QNAP provides dual 2.5 GbE ports and a PCIe slot for future 10 GbE/Wi‑Fi, whereas Synology only has 1 GbE.

QNAP TS-464

Power & efficiency

Power source is AC for both; no efficiency data provided to differentiate.

Tie

Compatibility

Synology’s DSM supports Docker containers and broad platform clients (Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android).

Synology DS923+

Price & value

Both retail around $600 for the diskless enclosure; no price advantage noted.

Tie

Warranty & support

QNAP lists a 2‑year warranty; Synology’s warranty length is not specified.

QNAP TS-464

Choose QNAP TS-464 if…

Home or SMB users needing fast wired networking and 4K video transcoding out‑of‑the‑box.

Choose Synology DS923+ if…

Users who prioritize an intuitive OS, Docker/virtualization, and SSD caching capabilities.

Common questions

Can I add 10 GbE networking later?

Yes, QNAP TS‑464 has a PCIe slot for a 10 GbE card; Synology DS923+ does not offer an expansion slot.

Which unit handles 4K media streaming better?

QNAP TS‑464 includes dedicated hardware transcoding for efficient 4K playback; Synology may struggle with heavy transcoding.

Do I need to buy drives separately for both?

Both are sold as diskless enclosures; drives must be purchased separately for each model.