FindAlternative
Back to Private Internet Access

Private Internet Access vs VyprVPN

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Private Internet Access
Private Internet AccessNo-logs VPN with open-source apps, unlimited connections, and strong torrenting support.
VyprVPN
VyprVPNIndependently audited no-log VPN with a proprietary DNS service.
Overview
Description

Private Internet Access (PIA) is a VPN service with servers in 90 countries, including all 50 US states, built around a no-logs policy that has been independently audited by Deloitte. It supports unlimited simultaneous device connections per subscription, fully open-source apps, and features like multi-hop connections, split tunneling, and a MACE ad/tracker/malware blocker, with strong support for torrenting and P2P traffic.

VyprVPN is a VPN service that has been operating for more than 15 years, encrypting internet traffic and masking IP addresses to protect user privacy. It positions itself as one of the first independently audited, no-log VPN providers in the industry, and runs its own proprietary VyprDNS infrastructure rather than relying on third-party DNS. The service includes obfuscated servers designed to bypass network restrictions and censorship, along with apps covering desktop, mobile, and streaming devices. VyprVPN offers roughly 70 countries of server coverage and recently released version 5 of its applications with updated performance and interface improvements.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
VPN Services
VPN Services
Best for
Privacy-conscious users and torrenters wanting an audited no-logs VPN with unlimited devices
Privacy-conscious individuals and streaming users wanting an audited no-log VPN
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
No
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Live Chat, 24/7
Support portal, 30-day money-back guarantee+25%
key integrations
Browser extensions (Chrome, Firefox)
Apple TV, Fire TV, Android TV, browser extensions
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Independently audited no-logs policy (Deloitte)
  • Fully open-source apps for transparency
  • Unlimited simultaneous device connections per account
  • Strong, explicit torrenting/P2P support
  • Independently audited no-log policy
  • Owns its own DNS infrastructure end-to-end
  • Long track record of over 15 years in operation
  • Apps for TVs and streaming devices
Cons
  • Based in the US, a Five Eyes intelligence-sharing country, which concerns some privacy purists
  • Best pricing requires a long-term 3-year commitment
  • Speeds on some distant servers can lag top-tier competitors per independent reviews
  • Smaller server network than larger competitors
  • Specific pricing not shown on the main homepage
  • Fewer advanced privacy features like multi-hop routing
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Private Internet Access

View all →
Windscribe
Windscribe

VPN with a generous free tier and built-in ad, tracker, and malware blocking.

Compare
IVPN
IVPN

No-logs VPN from a 15-year operator that publishes transparency reports and annual security audits.

Compare
VyprVPN
VyprVPN

Independently audited no-log VPN with a proprietary DNS service.

Compare
hide.me
hide.me

No-log VPN with a genuine free tier and apps for desktop, mobile, and browsers.

Compare

Alternatives to VyprVPN

View all →
IVPN
IVPN

No-logs VPN from a 15-year operator that publishes transparency reports and annual security audits.

Compare
Proton VPN
Proton VPN

Privacy-focused VPN from the makers of Proton Mail.

Compare
NordVPN
NordVPN

A fast, secure VPN with a large global server network.

Compare
Mullvad VPN
Mullvad VPN

Secure, private, and anonymous internet browsing without personal info

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

VyprVPN offers audited no‑log privacy with its own DNS and TV app support, while Private Internet Access provides more features, unlimited devices, and open‑source apps but is US‑based.

Key differences

  • •VyprVPN runs its own proprietary DNS service; PIA relies on standard DNS.
  • •PIA offers multi‑hop routing, MACE ad‑blocking, and unlimited simultaneous connections; VyprVPN does not.
  • •VyprVPN includes native apps for Apple TV, Fire TV, and Android TV; PIA only offers browser extensions.
  • •PIA’s apps are open‑source; VyprVPN’s apps are closed‑source.
  • •PIA provides 24/7 email and live‑chat support; VyprVPN offers a support portal and a 30‑day money‑back guarantee.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are paid subscriptions; specific pricing details are not provided for either.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

VyprVPN offers dedicated TV apps and a straightforward desktop/mobile suite, whereas PIA’s feature set is broader and may require more configuration.

VyprVPN

Features & depth

PIA includes multi‑hop VPN, MACE ad‑blocking, unlimited device connections, and explicit torrent support; VyprVPN lacks these.

Private Internet Access

Integrations & ecosystem

VyprVPN integrates with Apple TV, Fire TV, Android TV and browser extensions; PIA only lists browser extensions.

VyprVPN

Support

PIA offers 24/7 email and live‑chat; VyprVPN provides a support portal and a 30‑day money‑back guarantee.

Private Internet Access

Security & privacy

Both have independently audited no‑log policies; VyprVPN owns its DNS, PIA provides open‑source client code.

Tie

Choose Private Internet Access if…

Power users needing unlimited devices, torrenting, multi‑hop and open‑source transparency.

Choose VyprVPN if…

Privacy‑focused streamers who want DNS control and TV device apps.

Common questions

Which VPN has its own DNS service?

VyprVPN runs a proprietary VyprDNS service, keeping DNS queries within its own infrastructure.

Can I use the VPN on multiple devices simultaneously?

Private Internet Access allows unlimited simultaneous connections; VyprVPN does not specify a limit.

Is there open‑source client software?

Private Internet Access offers fully open‑source apps; VyprVPN’s apps are closed‑source.