FindAlternative
Back to Pillars of Eternity

Pillars of Eternity vs SaGa Frontier 2

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Pillars of Eternity
Pillars of EternityRecapture the deep sense of exploration and classic RPG adventure in a new fantasy realm.
SaGa Frontier 2
SaGa Frontier 2Shape history or be history in a sprawling fantasy RPG.
Overview
Description

Prepare to be enchanted by a world where the choices you make and the paths you choose shape your destiny. Recapture the deep sense of exploration, the joy of a pulsating adventure, and the thrill of leading your own band of companions across a new fantasy realm and into the depths of monster-infested dungeons in search of lost treasures and ancient mysteries. So gather your party, venture forth, and embrace adventure as you delve into a realm of wonder, nostalgia, and the excitement of classic RPGs with Obsidian's Pillars of Eternity. Experience tactical real-time-with-pause combat and a rich, reactive story penned by veteran role-playing game creators.

SaGa Frontier 2 lets you control decisive moments across decades of royal conflict, guiding characters like exiled Prince Gustave XIII and treasure hunter William Knights through a living, evolving saga. Their intertwined stories feature birth, growth, and death, with choices that reshape the kingdom and its crown. Experience hand‑painted watercolor visuals, strategic duel, team, and battle modes, and a deep combat system that blends realistic sword maneuvers with powerful magic, allowing hundreds of combo attacks.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
CRPG
CRPG
Best for
Fans of classic isometric RPGs and deep fantasy stories
Fans of deep narrative RPGs
Specifications
General
msrp
$29.99−50%
$59.99
release date
2015-03-26
1999-04-01
Specifications
developer
Obsidian Entertainment
Square Product Development Division 2
publisher
Obsidian Entertainment, Paradox Interactive
Square Electronic Arts, Square Enix, Square
age rating
ESRB M, PEGI 16
ESRB T
multiplayer
Single player
Single player
critic score
81/100
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Deep, reactive narrative with memorable companions
  • Tactical and rewarding real-time-with-pause combat system
  • Rich atmospheric world reminiscent of classic isometric RPGs
  • Extensive character customization and build variety
  • Rich, branching storyline
  • Stunning hand‑painted visuals
  • Deep combat system with combos
  • High replay value
Cons
  • Heavy amounts of reading and exposition may deter casual players
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers to classic tactical CRPGs
  • Inventory and micro-management can occasionally feel cumbersome
  • Limited to single‑player
  • Complex UI may overwhelm newcomers
  • Older graphics compared to modern titles
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Pillars of Eternity

View all →
EverQuest
EverQuest

Embark on an epic fantasy adventure in a living, breathing world.

Compare
Obsidian
Obsidian

Explore surreal sci‑fi puzzles in a mind‑bending adventure

Compare
The Wheel of Time
The Wheel of Time

Embark on a timeless fantasy quest across realms and battles

Compare
Age of Wonders
Age of Wonders

Turn-based fantasy strategy meets deep role‑playing adventure

Compare

Alternatives to SaGa Frontier 2

View all →
Gothic II
Gothic II

Epic medieval RPG adventure with dragons and faction choices

Compare
Dark Cloud 2
Dark Cloud 2

Forge your destiny in a world rebuilt from the ashes.

Compare
Pillars of Eternity
Pillars of Eternity

Recapture the deep sense of exploration and classic RPG adventure in a new fantasy realm.

Compare
Fable
Fable

Shape your destiny in a living, moral fantasy world.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Pillars of Eternity offers modern graphics, a lower price, and classic tactical combat, while SaGa Frontier 2 provides a sandbox‑style, branching narrative with higher replay value but at a higher cost and older visuals.

Key differences

  • •Price: $29.99 (A) vs $59.99 (B).
  • •Graphics era: 2015 modern engine (A) vs 1999 hand‑painted style (B).
  • •Replayability: SaGa’s Multi‑Scenario system and multiple endings (B) vs Pillars’ single‑path narrative with choices (A).
  • •Combat depth: Pillars uses real‑time‑with‑pause tactical fights (A); SaGa offers combo‑based strategic modes and duel/team battles (B).
  • •Content volume: Pillars includes base management and extensive character customization (A); SaGa focuses on generational story tracking (B).
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Pillars costs $29.99, half the price of SaGa’s $59.99, offering better price‑to‑content ratio.

Pillars of Eternity

Graphics & performance

Released in 2015 with modern graphics; SaGa’s 1999 hand‑painted visuals are dated.

Pillars of Eternity

Content & replayability

SaGa’s Multi‑Scenario system and multiple endings give higher replay potential than Pillars’ single‑path story.

SaGa Frontier 2

Gameplay & fun factor

Both offer deep tactical combat—Pillars with real‑time‑pause, SaGa with combo‑based strategic modes.

Tie

Difficulty & accessibility

Both have steep learning curves: Pillars heavy reading, SaGa complex UI; neither is clearly easier.

Tie

Multiplayer / co‑op

Both are single‑player only.

Tie

Platform availability

Pillars is a modern PC/console release; SaGa was originally a 1999 console title with limited modern ports.

Pillars of Eternity

Choose Pillars of Eternity if…

Buyers who want modern graphics, lower price, and classic tactical CRPG experience.

Choose SaGa Frontier 2 if…

Buyers who prioritize sandbox storytelling, high replay value, and don’t mind older graphics.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

Pillars of Eternity costs $29.99, while SaGa Frontier 2 costs $59.99.

Which title has more modern graphics?

Pillars of Eternity (2015) uses a modern engine; SaGa Frontier 2 (1999) features older hand‑painted visuals.

Which game offers more replayability?

SaGa Frontier 2’s Multi‑Scenario system and multiple endings give higher replay value than Pillars’ single‑path narrative.