FindAlternative
Back to Pesapal

Pesapal vs Square

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Pesapal
PesapalEast African payment gateway unifying M-Pesa, card, and NFC payments for merchants.
Square
SquarePayment processing and point-of-sale system for businesses
Overview
Description

Pesapal is a payment processing platform regulated by the Central Bank of Kenya, operating across Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Malawi. It gives merchants unified point-of-sale hardware and online tools to accept M-Pesa, cards, and NFC payments like Google Pay. Pesapal has been operating since 2009 and holds PCI DSS and PCI PTS security certifications, with integrations into hospitality systems such as Oracle Micros and Microsoft AMX for retail and restaurant merchants.

Square is a payment processing and point-of-sale system designed for businesses of all sizes. It provides a range of tools and services to help businesses manage their payments, sales, and customer relationships. With Square, businesses can accept payments, track sales, and manage their inventory and customer data all in one place.

Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Freemium
Category
Payment Processing
Payment Processing
Best for
Retailers, hospitality businesses, and e-commerce merchants in East Africa
Small to Medium-Sized Businesses
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Demo requests, merchant support
Email, Phone, Live Chat
key integrations
M-Pesa, Oracle Micros, Microsoft AMX, Google Pay
Shopify, QuickBooks, Xero
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Long operating history since 2009 builds trust in the region
  • Combines mobile money and card acceptance in one device
  • Regulated by the Central Bank of Kenya
  • Covers multiple East African markets, not just Kenya
  • Easy to use and set up
  • Accepts a wide range of payment types
  • Robust inventory management features
  • Integrates with third-party apps and services
Cons
  • Merchant pricing is not published and requires a demo request
  • Strongest fit for businesses already operating in East Africa
  • POS hardware integration adds setup complexity for very small sellers
  • Fees can add up for large businesses
  • Limited customization options for online stores
  • Customer support can be slow to respond
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Pesapal

View all →
Yoco
Yoco

Card payments and business management tools for South African small businesses.

Compare
Square
Square

Payment processing and point-of-sale system for businesses

Compare
Clip
Clip

Payment terminals and card readers that help small businesses in Mexico accept and manage payments.

Compare

Alternatives to Square

View all →
Culqi
Culqi

Peruvian payment platform for accepting cards, Yape, and digital wallets online and in person.

Compare
QuickBooks
QuickBooks

Small-business accounting and bookkeeping.

Compare
pizzaql
pizzaql

Modern OSS Order Management System for Pizza Restaurants

Compare
Stripe
Stripe

Financial infrastructure and payment processing platform for businesses of all sizes.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Square offers a globally‑focused, easy‑to‑use POS and payment suite with transparent freemium pricing, while Pesapal targets East African merchants with unified mobile‑money and card acceptance but no public pricing.

Key differences

  • •Geographic focus: Square is worldwide; Pesapal is limited to East and Southern Africa.
  • •Pricing transparency: Square’s freemium model is disclosed; Pesapal requires a demo for pricing.
  • •Payment methods: Square supports typical card, online, and in‑person payments; Pesapal uniquely integrates M‑Pay and NFC mobile‑money.
  • •Integration ecosystem: Square lists Shopify, QuickBooks, Xero; Pesapal lists M‑Pay, Oracle Micros, Microsoft AMX, Google Pay.
  • •Support channels: Square offers email, phone, live chat; Pesapal lists demo requests and merchant support only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Square provides a freemium tier with known fees; Pesapal’s pricing is undisclosed and requires a demo.

Square

Ease of use / learning curve

Square is described as easy to set up and use; Pesapal mentions hardware integration adds setup complexity.

Square

Features & depth

Both offer core payment processing and POS; Square adds inventory, e‑commerce, and loyalty; Pesapal adds M‑Pay and NFC.

Tie

Integrations & ecosystem

Square lists multiple popular SaaS integrations (Shopify, QuickBooks, Xero); Pesapal’s integrations are fewer and region‑specific.

Square

Support

Square provides email, phone, and live chat; Pesapal only mentions demo requests and merchant support.

Square

Security & privacy

Both are cloud SaaS and regulated (Pesapal by Central Bank of Kenya; Square’s compliance not specified).

Tie

Scalability

Square serves small to medium businesses globally and notes fees may rise for large firms; Pesapal is region‑limited.

Square

Choose Pesapal if…

East African merchants who must accept M‑Pay and NFC payments and operate under local regulations.

Choose Square if…

Businesses worldwide needing a ready‑to‑go POS with transparent pricing and broad SaaS integrations.

Common questions

What are the costs to start using each platform?

Square offers a freemium tier with disclosed transaction fees; Pesapal does not publish pricing and requires a demo request.

Can I sell outside East Africa with these tools?

Square works globally; Pesapal is limited to seven East and Southern African countries.

Do both solutions support mobile‑money payments?

Only Pesapal integrates M‑Pay mobile money; Square supports standard card and online payments but not regional mobile‑money.